|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
emm kay
Direct Action Resources
260
|
Posted - 2015.02.15 22:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
simple and easy way to fix every thing in one swipe, and it really is simple enough. you just have to do this one thing. that's it. no strings. here it is: Do NOT let squads into Public matches.
. hold off the "wat u say m8" stuff for a second. I'm going to explain how this will fix everything in one go:
Matchmaking-) without squads, scotty is allowed to make much better desecisions, he can put the usual squadders against eachother. this will provide even teams, games, and even a nice battle flow if scotty does this properly.
Protostomping-) All protostomping is forced to move to FW. New players will have a place to develop during pub matches, and experienced players can sap LPs
playerbase-) With more players being able to learn independently, we will see a bigger influx of players.
FW-) it will get the economy flowing. Once again, players will be competetive where they are supposed to be.
Why This may not be a great Idea: at first, most people will complain, This is inevitable
Why CCP won't listen to me: Because the people who squade are the biggest spenders on aurum. it's simple as that. CCP knows that Dust is under the mercy of those who play it, and even though legion is moving in ( I heard the alpha is floating around), Rattati doesn't want to loose those who pay his team's wages. I get that. but at this rate, What rattati is doing is like exposing more wick in an oil lamp. the lamp burns brighter, for a small time. I don't want that to happen. Do you?
There is a reason you never see me in battle.
it's because I see you first.
|
emm kay
Direct Action Resources
262
|
Posted - 2015.02.16 00:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Derpty Derp wrote:It would certainly have a chance at evening up the teams... But you forget some of the people who hate protato stompage and people playing games with their friends. They would throw quite the hissy fit if they couldn't guarantee being on the same team.
Then again if you add in something that tries to put players from the same corp/contacts list together, but only if possible without throwing balance off. It could work.
yes, Voting should be allowed. I think at 1ISK per vote sounds reasonable. Each vote sets off the power of one team ( the one you vote for) to be more powerful. In turn, the opposing team gets that ISK added to THEIR pot.
There is a reason you never see me in battle.
it's because I see you first.
|
emm kay
Direct Action Resources
262
|
Posted - 2015.02.16 01:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
Commander Noctus wrote:You're going to get torn apart for this. Every time that someone has suggested "Remove squads!" those same people come in and yell "Wtf, no git gud, make ur own squad scrb" and get their way.
It would be better altogether if there was just a separate mode that didn't allow squads rather than removing them outright. Re-Read.
There is a reason you never see me in battle.
it's because I see you first.
|
emm kay
Direct Action Resources
263
|
Posted - 2015.02.16 02:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Commander Noctus wrote:emm kay wrote:Commander Noctus wrote:You're going to get torn apart for this. Every time that someone has suggested "Remove squads!" those same people come in and yell "Wtf, no git gud, make ur own squad scrb" and get their way.
It would be better altogether if there was just a separate mode that didn't allow squads rather than removing them outright. Re-Read. Am I not understanding something? Or did my last comment come off wrong? I understand you don't want to remove squads from everything, just pubs, which is probably something I should've clarified in my post... ding ding. honestly I don't mind ein flatened by an LAV multiple times if i'm running apex. let's be honest anything short of infinite suits will be something you will have to get somewhat anxious forl.
There is a reason you never see me in battle.
it's because I see you first.
|
emm kay
Direct Action Resources
265
|
Posted - 2015.02.21 00:00:00 -
[5] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:So what you're saying, is you want to remove the ability to play with your friends in basically every game mode except PC and Facwar? I'm saying that you're going to have to go WITHOUT sqauds in dom, ambush, and skirm.,,,
There is a reason you never see me in battle.
it's because I see you first.
|
emm kay
Direct Action Resources
266
|
Posted - 2015.02.21 14:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:Until ISK rewards are added to FW or removed from FW LP store costs this scheme is a no-fly.
Because unless you're in PC you have to sip on the Pubmatch teat. Demanding that people not be allowed to team up in order to generate more isk faster or restrict them from playing with friends is self-serving and dickish in the extreme.
Squadding is hardly restricted to the "corp elite" and bluntly the cries to have squads removed is mewling.
yeah, what's up with that? why dont we get ISK from fw. it's a valid complaint, and I doubt it will be heard, but it is a problem.
There is a reason you never see me in battle.
it's because I see you first.
|
emm kay
Direct Action Resources
266
|
Posted - 2015.02.21 23:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
just collected my daily reward and joined a game. 2 squads Q-syncing. this is a problem ccp. hear me.
There is a reason you never see me in battle.
it's because I see you first.
|
emm kay
Direct Action Resources
266
|
Posted - 2015.02.22 00:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Kuruld Sengar wrote:I love this idea. A am a squadder and a proto runner and all that which means I beneft from the squads, but in the long run I will get more enjoyment out of this idea. We still have factional right? If anything, factional would be more active, and pubs would be more newbie friendly. Not sure if it will happen though, everyone seems to hate change. Especially if they are making bank on the current system. haha, it was your corp i was against in said game. no hard feelings. Sadly, no matter how popular this idea becomes, ccp won't give in. they get paid by the same people who don't want change.
There is a reason you never see me in battle.
it's because I see you first.
|
emm kay
Direct Action Resources
270
|
Posted - 2015.03.01 14:23:00 -
[9] - Quote
got back from a robotics tournament.
joined a few games
first game: pubstomped second game: pubstomped. third game: against newbies. felt bad an' left.
There is a reason you never see me in battle.
it's because I see you first.
|
emm kay
Direct Action Resources
270
|
Posted - 2015.03.01 15:00:00 -
[10] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:Yeah no.
Just because YOU want to run solo doesn't mean anyone else necessarily does, nor should they be forced to play the way YOU want them to.
This is in addition to the No ISk in facwar point from earlier.
You want it gone because you don't like it. that's fine. but your opinion that you don't like it is irrelevant as a balance concern.
thank you drive through.
Not only is the mechanic broken for EVERYONE who wants to run solo, this is real bad for newbies too. No newbie wants to get absolutetly steam rolled because of one group of people against their team.
There is a reason you never see me in battle.
it's because I see you first.
|
|
emm kay
Direct Action Resources
274
|
Posted - 2015.03.02 22:04:00 -
[11] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:Lightning35 Delta514 wrote:How about reducing squads to 4? It's a good idea yes but I think CCP would better reduce the sizes. I could actually buy into reduction of squad size for pubs, but removing them entirely is simply a stupid idea. I mean honestly, how many objective based FPS games out there don't let you group up with others? Solider front, AVA, CS GO (they let you do it, but don't encourage it) Solider front 2 Every COD game EVER ( I think, I haven't played them myself.) PS2 is the only game I see that teamwork is actually a nessecary role, and CCP is trying to do that with dust in a game in which it should not. This is not legion. This is dust.
I'm not trying to eliminate every squad ever. not in my OP i said in PUB MATCHES. PUB. MATCHES. if you want to squad, FW should be the place.
There is a reason you never see me in battle.
it's because I see you first.
|
|
|
|