|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Georgia Xavier
Redblade Clan
3
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 22:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
I have an idea I thought of. That 'magazine' we use for the scrambler rifle is some kind of battery right ? so lets say we make a charged shot,this amplifies our attack by 3.5x so why not use up 4 or 5 'pulses' each charged shot? this will allow us to burn through our ammo pool if we don't pay enough attention. Now don't get me wrong, I love using the scrambler rifle even if its impractical in some situations. I almost always use amarr weapons only. Just that I thought I'd share an idea. Moreover it should makes more sense as a powerful shot should use up more power. |
Georgia Xavier
Redblade Clan
3
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 22:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mex-0 wrote:I thought the ScR was fixed...?
Well yeah but then you still see people like Lhughes still bitching so i thought I should present an opinion |
Georgia Xavier
Redblade Clan
3
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 22:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
LOOKMOM NOHANDS wrote:Its pretty funny that the ScR catches so much heat when the CR is just as OP if not more OP.
Just give both guns a 5% reduction to base damage and call it a day.
They're both fine in my opinion,just that people try to find faults in the Scr so I tried to look at it they're way and mention a possible plug for their opinion holes |
Georgia Xavier
Redblade Clan
3
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 22:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
- |
Georgia Xavier
Redblade Clan
3
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 22:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
LUGMOS wrote:LOOKMOM NOHANDS wrote:Its pretty funny that the ScR catches so much heat when the CR is just as OP if not more OP.
Just give both guns a 5% reduction to base damage and call it a day. I've been saying that their hipfires are too good for their RoFs, but everyone just focuses on the Scrambler part and flips their lid.
that's actually a decent idea, the spread. I suppose The Scr needs a bit more spread. CQC weapons shouldn't have a very large spread but pales in comparison over longer ranges in terms of accuracy and efficiency when it comes to Scr or RR |
Georgia Xavier
Redblade Clan
3
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 22:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Georgia Xavier wrote:Mex-0 wrote:I thought the ScR was fixed...? Well yeah but then you still see people like Lhughes still bitching so i thought I should present an opinion This... is not a reason to nerf something.
I suppose you're right, my bad then |
Georgia Xavier
Redblade Clan
3
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 23:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
maluble wrote:LOOKMOM NOHANDS wrote:Its pretty funny that the ScR catches so much heat when the CR is just as OP if not more OP.
Just give both guns a 5% reduction to base damage and call it a day. Really? I have never been one shotted (over 500 damaged n one shot) by a CR. the charge shot is op plain and simple, and i dnt wana hear well it over heats. What does that matter when you can one shot most suits. I have to use an entire mag from my cr to take down tanked suits and my cr stats are maxed out.
To be fair, there is no way I can take out an pro amarr sentinel with my pro Scr assuming I can go through one whole mag without overheating. Charging the shot only works on scouts and mediums. |
Georgia Xavier
Redblade Clan
3
|
Posted - 2015.02.12 23:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
LOOKMOM NOHANDS wrote:A basic ScR does 65 HP of damage not charged.
With a complex damage mod, profile, and Pro V it does 328.62 to shield at full charge.
With a complex damage mod, and Pro V it would do 279.93
That difference is pretty extreme thanks to combining the charge up bonus to 20% extra damage to shields. In theory this bonus is offset by the -20% to armor but that drawback is quickly negated by 1-2 damage mods making it seem crazy OP against shields with little drawback on armor aside from the fact that the damage is reduced enough that you may over heat before you can get through the naturally higher armor numbers.
Dont scream nerf ScR or CR or anything else. Scream nerf damage profiles that are quickly offset leaving no drawback.
You took the time the calculate damage so you have my thumbs up. not many post arguments with something to back it up and I agree with you actually |
|
|
|