|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
2029
   |
Posted - 2015.02.11 01:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Definitely not.
ScR and CR have some of the best hipfires in the game for their achievable RoFs
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
2032
|
Posted - 2015.02.11 02:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
Fizzer XCIV wrote:LUGMOS wrote:Definitely not.
ScR and CR have some of the best hipfires in the game for their achievable RoFs TacAR has slightly better hipfire than the ScR, but slightly worse ADS accuracy. Do you even know what you are talking about? Its rediculous how many people just spout anti-ScR sentiment without even doing any research on them.
Reticule doesn't mean squat. That's why I included the last bit.
Shooting the ScR at max RoF (which is higher than the TAC AR's) does not make the weapon kick very much, if at all, making it pretty easy to aim with. The TAC Ar, however, kicks much more than the ScR, making it harder to aim with and making you having to sacrifice RoF to aim. Same deal with the Combat rifle. No kick, higher RoF.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
2032
|
Posted - 2015.02.11 02:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Compared to the Scrambler Rifle it seems worse off when hipfiring. Though, it is pretty good when used on the Gallente Assault since it improves recoil and hipfire by 25%. If you add that to the 25% decrease to dispersion from sharpshooter then you have a pretty accurate weapon on your hands.
Of course. More SP intensive however. Not hating on the ScR specifically though. CR also has this.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
2034
|
Posted - 2015.02.11 02:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
Fizzer XCIV wrote:Getting the ScR to Fitting Optimization 4-5 to cut back the severe PG costs more SP than both Sharpshooter V and Gallassault 5 together.
O...K... but that isn't even the point here. I could say that the AR is more fitting intensive as it ALSO has that skill, plus sharpshooter... get on point man.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
2035
|
Posted - 2015.02.11 02:43:00 -
[5] - Quote
Fizzer XCIV wrote:LUGMOS wrote:Fizzer XCIV wrote:Getting the ScR to Fitting Optimization 4-5 to cut back the severe PG costs more SP than both Sharpshooter V and Gallassault 5 together. O...K... but that isn't even the point here. I could say that the AR is more fitting intensive as it ALSO has that skill, plus sharpshooter... get on point man. ARs without fitting optimization use less PG than a ScR with Optimization V. I just figure since we are using the argument of "we have to use SP to make up for their drawbacks, there for higher SP costs"...
Never said that was the case, but ok.
What do you say about my "reticule means squat" post?
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
|
|
| |
|