Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Azrael Aranis
Ready to Play
21
|
Posted - 2015.02.07 18:28:00 -
[61] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Still game comparisons don't do that well for Dust 514.
Case in point when was the last FPS to feature a clash of clans mechanic in it?
Why would anyone want to have a clash of clans mechanic in a FPS game though?
Case in point when was the last racing game to feature a candy crush mechanic in it? The last icehockey game with a flappy bird mechanic? The last flight simulator with a hearthstone mechanic?
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
10976
|
Posted - 2015.02.07 18:30:00 -
[62] - Quote
Big Burns wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Raiden246 wrote:Things CCP needs to introduce:
1. Player driven interconnected economy between Eve Online and Dust 514 1. A. Increase in the number value of Dust ISK to match Eve ISK values. I see a major problem with this. Since the economies of both games are likely to be player driven, you will not be able to arbitrarily set a conversion rate effectively without having to constantly monitor the condition of both markets and adjust the conversion rates every so often to compensate. This is assuming that both economies are healthy enough and stable enough to be interconnected without causing any major damage to each other which means it will take a very long time to achieve. Why do you think CCP has its own paid economist? I don't think anything concerning the Dust economy will help as of right now. The introduction of APEX suits and passive warbarge isk is going to cause inflation. ISK everywhere and so the value of isk drops drastically.
If done right, the Dust economy can grow with or without the APEX suits and passive isk. You just have to set it up right and that is what will take the most time. I originally predicted this will take about 3 years to properly setup. I said that 1 year ago. 2 more to go.
On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
|
LHughes
State of Purgatory General Tso's Alliance
323
|
Posted - 2015.02.07 18:31:00 -
[63] - Quote
Big Burns wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:CoD:AW still gets down to 6FPS on my computer from time to time and degrades as the match goes on; gets fine afterwards. Has yet to be fixed and so far no body knows why or understands how the issue exists.
Major lag loading the two transitional state maps available currently.
COD is also about 120$ for full game.
CoD Community sends death threats to the developer for nerfing a sniper rifle 0.1 less seconds in its reload.
Despite being one of the most popular games in the world. During the times I usually play the largest thing slowing down the game is "Waiting for 2 more players. Games available 1 of 1" All other game modes are completely empty. PC version
Also CoD servers are Peer to peer. if its lagging its because of nitty host; or nitty netcode That's your problem right there. Who plays any FPS games on computer? Get good and play on playstation or XBROKE. And your complaining about waiting for 2 people?! I'd rather wait for two people and play a fair match, then spend 30 minutes looking for half a squad in Dust. And you HAVE TO BE IN A SQUAD to enjoy this game. No solo guy ever says: "WOW, I just had the best match against Nyain San in ambush. I got 12 kills and lost no suits, and we won. GTFO!
I do better solo (more kills)
That moment when you walk in on Rattati in the shower but he hasn't undressed yet
He's such a tease xx
|
Kalante Schiffer
Ancient Exiles.
950
|
Posted - 2015.02.07 19:08:00 -
[64] - Quote
John ShepardIII wrote:CCP should take off aim assist I liked it better back then I actually did better. And increase TTK, but if CCP does do that then they have to nerf mass drivers and flay locks because they'll be OP again Only if yall are willing to pay aurum for aim assist to turn on and off ccp might listen since they are taking the route of monetizing simple mechanics that should be no way shape or form should have to pay for in order to have it. Honestly i do not even bother to play dust for more than two games. All this content that is locked for months perhaps even over a year added to the warbarge was such a turn off to me. I am not gonna spend money on a game that i dont even know where it will be on a year and that is the problem here.
needs 10k components for level 3 components facility.
(only has 900 componets) day 3
Framerate>everything else
|
Big Burns
Dem Durrty Boyz General Tso's Alliance
545
|
Posted - 2015.02.07 19:16:00 -
[65] - Quote
LHughes wrote:Big Burns wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:CoD:AW still gets down to 6FPS on my computer from time to time and degrades as the match goes on; gets fine afterwards. Has yet to be fixed and so far no body knows why or understands how the issue exists.
Major lag loading the two transitional state maps available currently.
COD is also about 120$ for full game.
CoD Community sends death threats to the developer for nerfing a sniper rifle 0.1 less seconds in its reload.
Despite being one of the most popular games in the world. During the times I usually play the largest thing slowing down the game is "Waiting for 2 more players. Games available 1 of 1" All other game modes are completely empty. PC version
Also CoD servers are Peer to peer. if its lagging its because of nitty host; or nitty netcode That's your problem right there. Who plays any FPS games on computer? Get good and play on playstation or XBROKE. And your complaining about waiting for 2 people?! I'd rather wait for two people and play a fair match, then spend 30 minutes looking for half a squad in Dust. And you HAVE TO BE IN A SQUAD to enjoy this game. No solo guy ever says: "WOW, I just had the best match against Nyain San in ambush. I got 12 kills and lost no suits, and we won. GTFO! I do better solo (more kills)
Yea, because if you go in solo, you get easier matches than squading up. Match-making is messed up. If you join a squad full of new guys with only 20mil SP and 1mil WP, then the quality of the players in that match are lower than yours.
I'm a try-hard, because half my team sits in the MCC.
|
LHughes
State of Purgatory General Tso's Alliance
324
|
Posted - 2015.02.08 13:07:00 -
[66] - Quote
Big Burns wrote:LHughes wrote:Big Burns wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:CoD:AW still gets down to 6FPS on my computer from time to time and degrades as the match goes on; gets fine afterwards. Has yet to be fixed and so far no body knows why or understands how the issue exists.
Major lag loading the two transitional state maps available currently.
COD is also about 120$ for full game.
CoD Community sends death threats to the developer for nerfing a sniper rifle 0.1 less seconds in its reload.
Despite being one of the most popular games in the world. During the times I usually play the largest thing slowing down the game is "Waiting for 2 more players. Games available 1 of 1" All other game modes are completely empty. PC version
Also CoD servers are Peer to peer. if its lagging its because of nitty host; or nitty netcode That's your problem right there. Who plays any FPS games on computer? Get good and play on playstation or XBROKE. And your complaining about waiting for 2 people?! I'd rather wait for two people and play a fair match, then spend 30 minutes looking for half a squad in Dust. And you HAVE TO BE IN A SQUAD to enjoy this game. No solo guy ever says: "WOW, I just had the best match against Nyain San in ambush. I got 12 kills and lost no suits, and we won. GTFO! I do better solo (more kills) Yea, because if you go in solo, you get easier matches than squading up. Match-making is messed up. If you join a squad full of new guys with only 20mil SP and 1mil WP, then the quality of the players in that match are lower than yours.
lol no, why talk about something you clearly don't understand pettle?
Once 32 players are queued up they go into a battle, mu then seperates them in 'fair' teams.
mu doesn't match make, it match balances.
That moment when you walk in on Rattati in the shower but he hasn't undressed yet
He's such a tease xx
|
LHughes
State of Purgatory General Tso's Alliance
325
|
Posted - 2015.02.08 13:09:00 -
[67] - Quote
match making doesn't exist (playerbase to small) once 32 players are searching for battle it will put you in a game regardless of mu.
I ALWAYS end up playing full squads, it's just I'm pro and know how to not die.
That moment when you walk in on Rattati in the shower but he hasn't undressed yet
He's such a tease xx
|
Shamarskii Simon
The Hundred Acre Hood RISE of LEGION
109
|
Posted - 2015.02.08 13:38:00 -
[68] - Quote
I haven't read it all but i just wanted to say this to the OP.
CoD uses peer-to-peer... Proved by the ability to boot people (if host) and migrating hosts.
Entering the void and becoming wind with my repbus.
|
Big Burns
Dem Durrty Boyz General Tso's Alliance
554
|
Posted - 2015.02.08 19:58:00 -
[69] - Quote
LHughes wrote:Big Burns wrote:LHughes wrote:Big Burns wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:CoD:AW still gets down to 6FPS on my computer from time to time and degrades as the match goes on; gets fine afterwards. Has yet to be fixed and so far no body knows why or understands how the issue exists.
Major lag loading the two transitional state maps available currently.
COD is also about 120$ for full game.
CoD Community sends death threats to the developer for nerfing a sniper rifle 0.1 less seconds in its reload.
Despite being one of the most popular games in the world. During the times I usually play the largest thing slowing down the game is "Waiting for 2 more players. Games available 1 of 1" All other game modes are completely empty. PC version
Also CoD servers are Peer to peer. if its lagging its because of nitty host; or nitty netcode That's your problem right there. Who plays any FPS games on computer? Get good and play on playstation or XBROKE. And your complaining about waiting for 2 people?! I'd rather wait for two people and play a fair match, then spend 30 minutes looking for half a squad in Dust. And you HAVE TO BE IN A SQUAD to enjoy this game. No solo guy ever says: "WOW, I just had the best match against Nyain San in ambush. I got 12 kills and lost no suits, and we won. GTFO! I do better solo (more kills) Yea, because if you go in solo, you get easier matches than squading up. Match-making is messed up. If you join a squad full of new guys with only 20mil SP and 1mil WP, then the quality of the players in that match are lower than yours. lol no, why talk about something you clearly don't understand pettle? Once 32 players are queued up they go into a battle, mu then seperates them in 'fair' teams. mu doesn't match make, it match balances.
I suppose your right. I guess I'm MLG now bro, cause just yesterday I was running in a squad of newbies and had back to back matches where I had more than 30 kills and no deaths.
I'm a try-hard, because half my team sits in the MCC.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |