CoD:AW still gets 6FPS on my computer from time to time and degrades as the match goes on; gets fine afterwards.

Has yet to be fixed.

Major lag loading the two transitional state maps available currently.

COD is also about 120$ for full game.

CoD:AW still gets down to 6FPS on my computer from time to time and degrades as the match goes on; gets fine afterwards.
Has yet to be fixed and so far no body knows why or understands how the issue exists.

Major lag loading the two transitional state maps available currently.

COD is also about 120$ for full game.

CoD Community sends death threats to the developer for nerfing a sniper rifle 0.1 less seconds in its reload.

Despite being one of the most popular games in the world.
During the times I usually play the largest thing slowing down the game is "Waiting for 2 more players. Games available 1 of 1"
All other game modes are completely empty. PC version

Also CoD servers are Peer to peer. if its lagging its because of nitty host; or nitty netcode

Any new guns or maps or game modes or vehicles or suits in dust 514 has so far been FREE.

If we are to include CoD costimetics you're looking to around 230+ USD.

Drink some warm milk and take a nap.

Better yet stop going on the forums, give the game a rest, go away and don't come back until you calm down. It's a video game, screaming at people on the forums and being red in the face is not going to solve anything, it is going to merely make you even more aggravated.

Anytime a video game pisses you off, write a letter to the company if you really need to and then just walk away and do something more fun/productive/relaxing. Your current behavior is ridiculous and self-harming, as well as potentially making any valid complaints be ignored due to aforementioned behavior.

It's not worth it.

I play FPSs on a PC
I play solo in Dust all the time (you dont HAVE to be in squad)
I've had some of my best matches solo (including against a squad of Nyain)

Your arbitrary point scale: - 10 points
Attitude to replies: - 964,254,723,562,234.07

I give this post a -48 out of 10

This game is easily going in the same direction as EA and most of EA games are straight scams , just the fact that they have the brand name to back up their efforts and most of there community are sheep from Need For Speed to Madden to The Sims , they rarely add new game changing content and everything cost real money and while it's not pay to win , it is pay to get ahead and anyone with eyes to see can see that and yes the Dev's need money to function but so does every other business and ethics shouldn't allow that to be a rallying cry to " shortchange " their consumers and give shoddy performance measures and blame that on " cost effectiveness " all the while making money by these same methods .

It just makes that business look shady and that's just not a way , in my mind ... to garner consumer confidence .

It just creates a " rat race " by those who have and put up the money to spend to get that extra mileage while the have not's are left in the dust .

Why have skill trees and standards to move to the next level , threw hard work and performance if these same measures , while on the outside ... looks like they give the game structure and balance , only gives way to those who have the pockets to push forward faster then those who " actually " have to work for it .

That's not balance and if this company is trying to fashion themselves after EA , then I'm getting out now , before I get too wrapped up .

You wanna bash BB for spending money but it's that same funding that allows CCP to give the content that they provide so while you can say " it's your fault " ... without people that do such then this game would be moving even slower then it is now and with more performance issues then currently so your right I guess , he's dammed if he does and dammed if he doesn't .

I'm out almost 300 and will not spend another dime until they get this game up to specks .

People that spend fund the game but that's not a reason to " half @$$ " the system that's created , because of that .

You spend money , you would like to feel like it's worth the funds and the effort in giving them .

It's a two way street .

Still game comparisons don't do that well for Dust 514.

Case in point when was the last FPS to feature a clash of clans mechanic in it?

Not a developer;

cant fix things directly

I can generate hundreds of documents

and amount to nothing.

See the problem is your "documents" are actually investigating core issues with the game instead of finding new ways for CCP to cashgrab.

If you find a way to fix this game that involves selling Aurum, I'm sure CCP would listen.

Big Burns...

1. You're an @sshole.

2. The CPM spend hundreds of hours of unpaid time to improve this game.

3. What have you done for this game? Nothing. All you have done is attempt to humiliate those that actually are doing tangible things to improve the game.

4. You obviously know nothing about software development.

5. You're an @sshole.

6. I've blocked your posts and I hope the CPM do the same.

I see a major problem with this. Since the economies of both games are likely to be player driven, you will not be able to arbitrarily set a conversion rate effectively without having to constantly monitor the condition of both markets and adjust the conversion rates every so often to compensate.

This is assuming that both economies are healthy enough and stable enough to be interconnected without causing any major damage to each other which means it will take a very long time to achieve. Why do you think CCP has its own paid economist?

I do better solo (more kills)

lol no, why talk about something you clearly don't understand pettle?

Once 32 players are queued up they go into a battle, mu then seperates them in 'fair' teams.

mu doesn't match make, it match balances.