DUST Search - Why are ADS's acting as if they are Gunships?

Godin Thekiller wrote:

Juno Tristan wrote:

Godin Thekiller wrote:

Juno Tristan wrote:

Why not rename the ADS to gunship, get rid of the extra seats then everyone can stop pissing and moaning about it's intended role.

Dropping off passengers is for the normal DS, the ADS doesn't have enough tank.

A tanks counter to an ADS if directly above should be the use of small turrets, which should be given higher elevation

That's not a counter if the pilot can't do it, that's another person helping the Pilot. You want me to require teamwork to shoot back, than require teamwork to shoot.

Oh, I get it. If you're going to QQ this really should be in GD along with the people complaining "that darn sniper rifle dun shot me and ma gun don't fire so far"

That isn't QQ,that is balance. If something should require teamwork to counter something that doesn't, that isn't balanced. If something has to use teamwork to fight something that has to use teamwork to counter it, that is balanced. Prove me wrong.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Juno Tristan Obscure Reference 323	Posted - 2015.02.04 02:49:00 - [1] - Quote Why not rename the ADS to gunship, get rid of the extra seats then everyone can stop pissing and moaning about it's intended role. Dropping off passengers is for the normal DS, the ADS doesn't have enough tank. A tanks counter to an ADS if directly above should be the use of small turrets, which should be given higher elevation ADS Ramming Revenge! Should Have Stayed Inside (the Tank)
Juno Tristan Obscure Reference 323	Posted - 2015.02.04 03:06:00 - [2] - Quote Godin Thekiller wrote: Juno Tristan wrote: Why not rename the ADS to gunship, get rid of the extra seats then everyone can stop pissing and moaning about it's intended role. Dropping off passengers is for the normal DS, the ADS doesn't have enough tank. A tanks counter to an ADS if directly above should be the use of small turrets, which should be given higher elevation That's not a counter if the pilot can't do it, that's another person helping the Pilot. You want me to require teamwork to shoot back, than require teamwork to shoot. Oh, I get it. If you're going to QQ this really should be in GD along with the people complaining "that darn sniper rifle dun shot me and ma gun don't fire so far" ADS Ramming Revenge! Should Have Stayed Inside (the Tank)
Juno Tristan Obscure Reference 323	Posted - 2015.02.04 03:18:00 - [3] - Quote Godin Thekiller wrote: Juno Tristan wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Juno Tristan wrote: Why not rename the ADS to gunship, get rid of the extra seats then everyone can stop pissing and moaning about it's intended role. Dropping off passengers is for the normal DS, the ADS doesn't have enough tank. A tanks counter to an ADS if directly above should be the use of small turrets, which should be given higher elevation That's not a counter if the pilot can't do it, that's another person helping the Pilot. You want me to require teamwork to shoot back, than require teamwork to shoot. Oh, I get it. If you're going to QQ this really should be in GD along with the people complaining "that darn sniper rifle dun shot me and ma gun don't fire so far" That isn't QQ,that is balance. If something should require teamwork to counter something that doesn't, that isn't balanced. If something has to use teamwork to fight something that has to use teamwork to counter it, that is balanced. Prove me wrong. Because the ADS has ambushed you, it's snuck up behind you with a shotgun and is having it's way with you In the same way that if it was across the map or engaging something else you could railgun it oblivion Edit apply your reasoning to tanks and you have my point ADS Ramming Revenge! Should Have Stayed Inside (the Tank)