| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mex-0
T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K
General Tso's Alliance
331
   |
Posted - 2015.01.27 18:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
The first match I played today, was against squads of molon labe and nyain san. We lost objective A in record time, and out of the 5 people, literally 5 people on our team, not a single one of us went positive. Not even 1/5.
CCP, fix this ****, this is what drives new players away.
Gû¼+¦GòÉGòÉn¦ñ
|
abdullah muzaffar
G0DS AM0NG MEN
General Tso's Alliance
414
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 18:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Not enough incentive to keep wasting isk, which is why people cant fight against stomps, unless theyre pc rich.
Increasing base isk and sp payouts would be a star, especially for skirm and dom. |
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
3008
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 18:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
We had some odd matches late night last night....6v9, 10v16....and I was on the losing end of a few of them.
Guess Scotty is paying us back this morning.
Sorry you got stomped. That's never fun. |
Leovarian L Lavitz
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
1367
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 18:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
Been having pretty good matches today
Omni-Soldier
Few are my equal in these specialties, none compare in all of them
|
Soldner VonKuechle
SAM-MIK
General Tso's Alliance
1420
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 18:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
THERE IS LITERALLY NO MATCHMAkING YOU DUCKS!
we have match "balancing "
Where after 32 players are assigned to a battle, the ai tries top balance teams via squad numbers.
I repeat: NO TRUE MATCHMAKING EXISTS.*
*unless something happened in 1.9 1.10 that i am unaware of.
I've seen more bad ideas on these forums than the US Congress over the last decade.
|
Leovarian L Lavitz
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
1372
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 18:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
I mean, I've been having some pretty good match balancing today. I can't wait for the 4-man squads I firmly believe it will lead to better balanced matches in pubs.
Omni-Soldier
Few are my equal in these specialties, none compare in all of them
|
Mobius Wyvern
Sky-FIRE
5722
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 19:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mex-0 wrote:The first match I played today, was against squads of molon labe and nyain san. We lost objective A in record time, and out of the 5 people, literally 5 people on our team, not a single one of us went positive. Not even 1/5.
CCP, fix this ****, this is what drives new players away.
Remember guys, Warlords 1.0 is coming on February 3rd with NO improvements to either matchmaking or performance.
Get your wallets ready!
I support Keshava for Gallente Specialist HAV
R.I.P. Kesha
|
Soldner VonKuechle
SAM-MIK
General Tso's Alliance
1421
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 19:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Mex-0 wrote:The first match I played today, was against squads of molon labe and nyain san. We lost objective A in record time, and out of the 5 people, literally 5 people on our team, not a single one of us went positive. Not even 1/5.
CCP, fix this ****, this is what drives new players away. Remember guys, Warlords 1.0 is coming on February 3rd with NO improvements to either matchmaking or performance. Get your wallets ready!
Yup, gonna keep buying cheap veteran packs and then sell all the extra BPOs when player trading comes in.
I make isk. Devs make money. Game continues to exist. Mobius continues to be butthurt.
All because matchmaking has never existed.
I've seen more bad ideas on these forums than the US Congress over the last decade.
|
Thumb Green
Raymond James Corp
2023
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 19:51:00 -
[9] - Quote
Soldner VonKuechle wrote:THERE IS LITERALLY NO MATCHMAkING YOU DUCKS!
we have match "balancing "
Where after 32 players are assigned to a battle, the ai tries top balance teams via squad numbers.
I repeat: NO TRUE MATCHMAKING EXISTS.*
*unless something happened in 1.9 1.10 that i am unaware of.
Scotty is the matchmaking. It's obviously the shittyest matchmaker ever made but it is a matchmaker none the less. The "balancing" is the MU crap they introduced not too long ago which is also just as ******.
[RYJC]
|
Copharus Arkana
Seykal Expeditionary Group
Minmatar Republic
33
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 19:52:00 -
[10] - Quote
I know, right? Matchmaking is totally working. I always win because the other team are always whinny bitches who can't figure out how to deal with their own problems and instead complain all over the forums. |
|
|
DDx77
The Exemplars
RISE of LEGION
98
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 20:01:00 -
[11] - Quote
what might help is to have an easy way to communicate with other players not in your squad and that do not have mics
Whether that's a system similar to what mgs online had or simple command keys when you press r3 or l3
Proto gear is an advantage but let's be honest most of these squads could win just as much with adv gear
I think its mostly their superior communication and teamwork that allows them to stomp |
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
7442
|
Posted - 2015.01.27 20:24:00 -
[12] - Quote
Thumb Green wrote:Soldner VonKuechle wrote:THERE IS LITERALLY NO MATCHMAkING YOU DUCKS!
we have match "balancing "
Where after 32 players are assigned to a battle, the ai tries top balance teams via squad numbers.
I repeat: NO TRUE MATCHMAKING EXISTS.*
*unless something happened in 1.9 1.10 that i am unaware of. Scotty is the matchmaking. It's obviously the shittyest matchmaker ever made but it is a matchmaker none the less. The "balancing" is the MU crap they introduced not too long ago which is also just as ******.
What I don't get is why I had less problems before Mu than after.
I never got all the complaints about Scotty (aside from when he put you in at the end of the match, which is being fixed in Warlords 1.0 YAY!). Most of the matches were at least competitive, and the ones that weren't didn't let you think you could even try and fight back and were over with quickly. Now they all feel torturous.
Thunderbolt. verb and noun.
"James thunderbolted in his pants."
"I lit a bag of thunderbolt on fire on CCP's doorway"
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |