DUST Search - Invincible Gunnlogi Q.Q

All Channels

General Discussions

Invincible Gunnlogi Q.Q

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Blow-Me Please Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State 14	Posted - 2015.01.15 15:57:00 - [31] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Blow-Me Please wrote: Thats not broken,,,thats you thinking you are invincible because you are in triple repped maddie. Dont sit in the open dumazz. Good for that swarmer. Your train of thought is broken. Why should it take 2-3, or more forms of AV to kill a tank? IT shouldn't. if you are dumb enough to hang around while getting azz pounded then you had it coming. That is all I have been messing with lately,,,min commando with swarms and Bk42. They are fun. Ha! The double standards are strong in this one. HAVs lost their infantry fighting capabilities to supposedly focus on vehicle engagement, whereas infantry sacrifice nothing in order to fight vehicles, as proven by the broken Min Commando. Deals ludicrous amounts of AV damage for a skill-less weapon, the swarm launcher, and can always switch back to a combat rifle that also benefits from the same suit bonuses as the swarm launcher. What infantry wants, infantry gets. And you are wrong. Infantry doesn't sacrifice anything to fight vehicles? Thats a load of sh!t and you know it. A swarmer sacrifices his light weapon spot, to only be able to defend himself with a sidearm unless he is a commando. Then he sacrifices any of the mods for precision or profile dampening becuz commandos are pretty bare. Everybody is sacrificing something. Because your tank requires a whole lot of skill? Thats cute. Rolling around in a 5000 HP metal can with hardener capabilities and afterburner/nitrous. Vehicles roles are to support infantry secure the objective. Not infantry support vehicles.
Blow-Me Please Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State 14	Posted - 2015.01.15 16:00:00 - [32] - Quote xavier zor wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: Harpyja wrote: Blow-Me Please wrote: Thats not broken,,,thats you thinking you are invincible because you are in triple repped maddie. Dont sit in the open dumazz. Good for that swarmer. Your train of thought is broken. Why should it take 2-3, or more forms of AV to kill a tank? IT shouldn't. if you are dumb enough to hang around while getting azz pounded then you had it coming. That is all I have been messing with lately,,,min commando with swarms and Bk42. They are fun. Ha! The double standards are strong in this one. HAVs lost their infantry fighting capabilities to supposedly focus on vehicle engagement, whereas infantry sacrifice nothing in order to fight vehicles, as proven by the broken Min Commando. Deals ludicrous amounts of AV damage for a skill-less weapon, the swarm launcher, and can always switch back to a combat rifle that also benefits from the same suit bonuses as the swarm launcher. What infantry wants, infantry gets. Minmmods only gets 5% more damage than a suit with 3 damage mods, they also don't have a grenade slot, so let's not say its OP. Shield tanks just activate hardener and drive off. drive off tht is the part that i hate about swarms. 1 infantry player with 1 AV weapon should not make a tank drive off LOL I love your sense of entitlement. You must be an American. Self entitled pr!cks we are. Tanks are not win buttons. You did not conquer or beat dust becuz you are sitting in the tank. You can have a cookie for a consolation prize.
Ultervilet Sunberns Kameira Lodge Amarr Empire 13	Posted - 2015.01.15 16:16:00 - [33] - Quote Middas Betancore wrote: I like proxy mines But they're too hard to use and generally unreliable...
Spkr4theDead Red Star. 2742	Posted - 2015.01.15 17:34:00 - [34] - Quote FLAY LOCKED wrote: Me = Wyrkomi Swarms + proficiency 5 + 2 complex damage mods Blueberry #1: KLA 90 PLC Blueberry #2: some proto cal assault with what I believe to be proto swarms V.S. Gunnlogi that just sat there, barely took any damage, and laughed in our faces as our fellow blueberries dropped. We spent the entire match trying to blow his tank up, but the darn thing was nigh invincible. I'm sad... and tankers are complaining that AV is overpowered? Why don't they fit their tanks like that Gunnlogi user. I'm sure their complaints would stop. Absolutely impossible. Please, go away. I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
Vulpes Dolosus Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 2817	Posted - 2015.01.15 17:44:00 - [35] - Quote Pics / Vid or it didn't happen. I'm pretty sure what happened was either incompetence on the part of you and the blueberries or hitting/ running on the part of the Gunnlogi pilot. Shield tanks are meant for burst tanking, so if he charged in with hardeners running and left when they were down, that's just how it goes. The counter is to chase it down or corner it. Dust is there! I was real! Dear diary, Rattati senpai noticed me today~
Patrick57 Incorruptibles 9657	Posted - 2015.01.15 18:07:00 - [36] - Quote Joel II X wrote: xavier zor wrote: Yeah, invincible for the duration of his hardeners, before he has to retreat into he redline and wait for them to re-activate. If he goes out without his hardeners able to be used, the moment another tank hits him, he is dead and the moment swarms/forgers hit him he has to run. AV is overpowered hardeners are being used to stop infantry fire instead of vehicle fire, that is how OP AV is Hate it when tankers retreat to their redline. What a bunch of wusses. I hate it when they just sit right next to or in their redline. get out of there and fight me 1 v 1 :( i fucking hate waffles
Stupid Blueberry Pure Evil. Capital Punishment. 930	Posted - 2015.01.15 18:11:00 - [37] - Quote Nonoriri ko wrote: xavier zor wrote: It should take more than 1 person to kill my tank. No. If it took more than one person to kill you that is called unbalanced. 1 person should be able to kill any other 1 person, no matter what. Being amazing, being in a vehicle, being a redliner, being anything, everything should have a counter to be balanced. When it takes 2 or more people to kill 1 person, thats when things need to get nerfed. yeah tanks have counters, they're called other tanks, ads, swarms, forge, PLC, remote explosives, AV grenades, flux grenades, nova knives, etc. Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Haajakin Kalen.
Stupid Blueberry Pure Evil. Capital Punishment. 930	Posted - 2015.01.15 18:13:00 - [38] - Quote Blow-Me Please wrote: Harpyja wrote: Blow-Me Please wrote: Thats not broken,,,thats you thinking you are invincible because you are in triple repped maddie. Dont sit in the open dumazz. Good for that swarmer. Your train of thought is broken. Why should it take 2-3, or more forms of AV to kill a tank? IT shouldn't. if you are dumb enough to hang around while getting azz pounded then you had it coming. That is all I have been messing with lately,,,min commando with swarms and Bk42. They are fun. Ha! The double standards are strong in this one. HAVs lost their infantry fighting capabilities to supposedly focus on vehicle engagement, whereas infantry sacrifice nothing in order to fight vehicles, as proven by the broken Min Commando. Deals ludicrous amounts of AV damage for a skill-less weapon, the swarm launcher, and can always switch back to a combat rifle that also benefits from the same suit bonuses as the swarm launcher. What infantry wants, infantry gets. And you are wrong. Infantry doesn't sacrifice anything to fight vehicles? Thats a load of sh!t and you know it. A swarmer sacrifices his light weapon spot, to only be able to defend himself with a sidearm unless he is a commando. Then he sacrifices any of the mods for precision or profile dampening becuz commandos are pretty bare. Everybody is sacrificing something. Because your tank requires a whole lot of skill? Thats cute. Rolling around in a 5000 HP metal can with hardener capabilities and afterburner/nitrous. Vehicles roles are to support infantry secure the objective. Not infantry support vehicles. lolno Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Haajakin Kalen.
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 5515	Posted - 2015.01.15 18:22:00 - [39] - Quote MINA Longstrike wrote: Joel II X wrote: xavier zor wrote: Yeah, invincible for the duration of his hardeners, before he has to retreat into he redline and wait for them to re-activate. If he goes out without his hardeners able to be used, the moment another tank hits him, he is dead and the moment swarms/forgers hit him he has to run. AV is overpowered hardeners are being used to stop infantry fire instead of vehicle fire, that is how OP AV is Hate it when tankers retreat to their redline. What a bunch of wusses. What are they supposed to do? sit still and let you kill them? Well, no, but why retreat to the redline? It takes only a few seconds to get there while in a tank, but infantry die to tanks in less than 3 seconds with no chance to run away to any redline if in an open area. Infantry don't have hardeners, nor do they have the speed. Now, dont get me wrong. I'm not suggesting to nerf tanks or mega-buff infantry, I'm just saying that that is a broken tactic (I'd say it's the equivalent of a redline sniper). I only stated the opinion of my dislike of the use of such tactics and called tankers out on it.
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 5515	Posted - 2015.01.15 18:29:00 - [40] - Quote Stupid Blueberry wrote: Blow-Me Please wrote: Harpyja wrote: Blow-Me Please wrote: Thats not broken,,,thats you thinking you are invincible because you are in triple repped maddie. Dont sit in the open dumazz. Good for that swarmer. Your train of thought is broken. Why should it take 2-3, or more forms of AV to kill a tank? IT shouldn't. if you are dumb enough to hang around while getting azz pounded then you had it coming. That is all I have been messing with lately,,,min commando with swarms and Bk42. They are fun. Ha! The double standards are strong in this one. HAVs lost their infantry fighting capabilities to supposedly focus on vehicle engagement, whereas infantry sacrifice nothing in order to fight vehicles, as proven by the broken Min Commando. Deals ludicrous amounts of AV damage for a skill-less weapon, the swarm launcher, and can always switch back to a combat rifle that also benefits from the same suit bonuses as the swarm launcher. What infantry wants, infantry gets. And you are wrong. Infantry doesn't sacrifice anything to fight vehicles? Thats a load of sh!t and you know it. A swarmer sacrifices his light weapon spot, to only be able to defend himself with a sidearm unless he is a commando. Then he sacrifices any of the mods for precision or profile dampening becuz commandos are pretty bare. Everybody is sacrificing something. Because your tank requires a whole lot of skill? Thats cute. Rolling around in a 5000 HP metal can with hardener capabilities and afterburner/nitrous. Vehicles roles are to support infantry secure the objective. Not infantry support vehicles. lolno Actually, he's right and wrong at the same time. Vehicles are supposed to support infantry by giving extra fire power to hold off enemies, while the infantry ate supposed to take care of anti-vehicle that's to make sure the vehicles do their job. An infantry's job is to take care of turrets, enemy-AV, and clean off an area to make room for the tank to pass by. As it is right now, tanks DO suppress enemies, but the turrets don't pose much of a threat unless the tank is just sitting there not taking damage. As for enemy-AV, that's up to the red team to manage, so there may be either 0 doing it, or as many as 16. Not much harmony in my eyes.

Lazer Fo Cused Shining Flame Amarr Empire 474	Posted - 2015.01.15 18:29:00 - [41] - Quote Joel II X wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: Joel II X wrote: xavier zor wrote: Yeah, invincible for the duration of his hardeners, before he has to retreat into he redline and wait for them to re-activate. If he goes out without his hardeners able to be used, the moment another tank hits him, he is dead and the moment swarms/forgers hit him he has to run. AV is overpowered hardeners are being used to stop infantry fire instead of vehicle fire, that is how OP AV is Hate it when tankers retreat to their redline. What a bunch of wusses. What are they supposed to do? sit still and let you kill them? Well, no, but why retreat to the redline? It takes only a few seconds to get there while in a tank, but infantry die to tanks in less than 3 seconds with no chance to run away to any redline if in an open area. Infantry don't have hardeners, nor do they have the speed. Now, dont get me wrong. I'm not suggesting to nerf tanks or mega-buff infantry, I'm just saying that that is a broken tactic (I'd say it's the equivalent of a redline sniper). I only stated the opinion of my dislike of the use of such tactics and called tankers out on it. 1. Because they have no other option 2. They need to wait 30seconds or more for the modules to come back 3. A vehicle is alot more expensive than your barbie onesie 4. While everything is off it is super weak 5. AV infantry can be hiding anywhere 6. SL missiles will follow you back 400m 7. This has to be bait
Patrick57 Incorruptibles 9658	Posted - 2015.01.15 19:01:00 - [42] - Quote Nonoriri ko wrote: xavier zor wrote: It should take more than 1 person to kill my tank. No. If it took more than one person to kill you that is called unbalanced. 1 person should be able to kill any other 1 person, no matter what. Being amazing, being in a vehicle, being a redliner, being anything, everything should have a counter to be balanced. When it takes 2 or more people to kill 1 person, thats when things need to get nerfed. and here's our problem! infantry: "1 swarmer/forger = 1 tank. I should be able to kill them myself!" tankers: "it should take a whole squad to kill me!" I understand that not all infantry or tankers are like that^ But where do you balance it? Should tankers get bonuses to have other players in their tank (making it more team oriented to make up for having multiple infantry trying to destroy it)? Should tanks cost 1 mil isk each? What is the inbetween that would appease both infantry and tankers? i fucking hate waffles
P14GU3 Savage Bullet 1142	Posted - 2015.01.15 19:02:00 - [43] - Quote H0riz0n Unlimit wrote: FLAY LOCKED wrote: Me = Wyrkomi Swarms + proficiency 5 + 2 complex damage mods Blueberry #1: KLA 90 PLC Blueberry #2: some proto cal assault with what I believe to be proto swarms V.S. Gunnlogi that just sat there, barely took any damage, and laughed in our faces as our fellow blueberries dropped. We spent the entire match trying to blow his tank up, but the darn thing was nigh invincible. I'm sad... and tankers are complaining that AV is overpowered? Why don't they fit their tanks like that Gunnlogi user. I'm sure their complaints would stop. Yeah, he is Op for 25 second, you are Op for an entire game, it seems legit... This is exactly the way CCP has designed vehicles. They have stated that they EXPECT tanks to destroy near everything for 20-30 seconds and then retreat while their mods cool down/repair. If this is not how you are fitting your tank, expect to die. Fit heavy buffer/hardner tanks and retreat when you have to. Gone are the days of being a near unstoppable force for the entire match. 'Sault AK.0 - Logi AK.0 - Logi GK.0 - Scout GK.0 - 'Mando MK.0 - Masshole in every sense of the word.
Raiden246 Murphys-Law General Tso's Alliance 1	Posted - 2015.01.15 21:22:00 - [44] - Quote SgtMajSquish MLBJ wrote: FLAY LOCKED wrote: Me = Wyrkomi Swarms + proficiency 5 + 2 complex damage mods Blueberry #1: KLA 90 PLC Blueberry #2: some proto cal assault with what I believe to be proto swarms V.S. Gunnlogi that just sat there, barely took any damage, and laughed in our faces as our fellow blueberries dropped. We spent the entire match trying to blow his tank up, but the darn thing was nigh invincible. I'm sad... and tankers are complaining that AV is overpowered? Why don't they fit their tanks like that Gunnlogi user. I'm sure their complaints would stop. Its not the tankers that are complaining. Its the ADS pilots Lol at how people always whine about random nonsense. The tank will be borderline invincible with complex shield hardeners; wait for those to go down and it's cake to destroy it. As for tankers, is there anything that's ever survived the proto-missile barrage? They have all the tools needed as well, no point in whining. If anything, complaints should be coming from the ADS users. Hard plastic armor and static electricity shields V.S. proto AV? it's a flat out waste of ISK.
KILL3R H3LLH0UND Titans of Phoenix VP Gaming Alliance 183	Posted - 2015.01.15 21:31:00 - [45] - Quote Nonoriri ko wrote: xavier zor wrote: It should take more than 1 person to kill my tank. No. If it took more than one person to kill you that is called unbalanced. 1 person should be able to kill any other 1 person, no matter what. Being amazing, being in a vehicle, being a redliner, being anything, everything should have a counter to be balanced. When it takes 2 or more people to kill 1 person, thats when things need to get nerfed. Alright, fine. lets go by your logic. Make a PRO fitted tank cost as much as a pro dropsuit, and make my xt python cost as much as a pro dropsuit. A suit under 200k should not be able to solo my half a million vehicle. It's people like you who make this game aso broken. Ex-Master Scout Trainer, been falling in love with my Minja again. I <3 my Gû¼+¦GòÉGòÉn¦ñ
Shamarskii Simon The Hundred Acre Hood RISE of LEGION 39	Posted - 2015.01.15 21:37:00 - [46] - Quote If they call hardeners op and nerf them again... Lol i would be surprised. That fit (i use it on my myron sometimes) is severely gimped when hardeners fall... However.. It's a swarm proof rock during uptime. It's not invincible, it's just the modules in great usage.
Raiden246 Murphys-Law General Tso's Alliance 2	Posted - 2015.01.15 21:41:00 - [47] - Quote KILL3R H3LLH0UND wrote: Nonoriri ko wrote: xavier zor wrote: It should take more than 1 person to kill my tank. No. If it took more than one person to kill you that is called unbalanced. 1 person should be able to kill any other 1 person, no matter what. Being amazing, being in a vehicle, being a redliner, being anything, everything should have a counter to be balanced. When it takes 2 or more people to kill 1 person, thats when things need to get nerfed. Alright, fine. lets go by your logic. Make a PRO fitted tank cost as much as a pro dropsuit, and make my xt python cost as much as a pro dropsuit. A suit under 200k should not be able to solo my half a million vehicle. It's people like you who make this game aso broken. You don't seem to realise how purely idiotic your train of thought is. Just because something is highly expensive, does not mean that it should automatically perform better than something with a lower cost. If you don't like how much you're spending, change your fittings. Making a 500,000+ ISK dropship fitting won't make it any more resistant to being pulverized by Wrykomi swarms, and if you don't like that, who the hell cares? Go bltch and moan to CCP and see if they listen. Both sides need to stop combating at any rate. The logic that tanks need to have multiple people attacking them simultaneously to be destroyed, is idiotic. So much so is the idea that tanks need to be nerfed, when realistically that only puts them dangerously closer to being as weak as dropships.
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 16600	Posted - 2015.01.15 21:56:00 - [48] - Quote Raiden246 wrote: You don't seem to realise how purely idiotic your train of thought is. Just because something is highly expensive, does not mean that it should automatically perform better than something with a lower cost. If you don't like how much you're spending, change your fittings. Making a 500,000+ ISK dropship fitting won't make it any more resistant to being pulverized by Wrykomi swarms, and if you don't like that, who the hell cares? Go bltch and moan to CCP and see if they listen. Both sides need to stop combating at any rate. The logic that tanks need to have multiple people attacking them simultaneously to be destroyed, is idiotic. So much so is the idea that tanks need to be nerfed, when realistically that only puts them dangerously closer to being as weak as dropships. Actually a very interesting discussion to be had from that suggestion. "The logic that tanks need to have multiple people attacking them simultaneously to be destroyed, is idiotic" A lot of other games balance tanks around the operation by two people. One pilot and main gunner with an anti tank gun, and one secondary gunner. Tanks in those games are see as incredible threats and are usually taken out rapidly. One single person can do it themselves yes, but oddly enough in those communities I rarely hear crying about having to work with another player to knock out a tank. They just get on with it and do it. I'd love to push tanks in Dust away from anti infantry main guns and into the realms of Main Battle Cannon. *"He spoke, and we made it so all worlds were one, all peoples were one, all faiths, creeds, and nationalities were one.
Vitantur Nothus Nos Nothi 1759	Posted - 2015.01.15 22:09:00 - [49] - Quote Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: Again ppl, not liking something is not a valid point toward balance. When it comes to pilots, "balance" is an overly broad term. Some found 1.7 to be "balanced", strange as that may seem.


Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page