DUST Search - [Petition] Remove Advanced and proto AV till we have equivelent

All Channels

General Discussions

[Petition] Remove Advanced and proto AV till we have equivelent

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Vitantur Nothus Nos Nothi 1671	Posted - 2015.01.13 01:20:00 - [31] - Quote True Adamance wrote: LUGMOS wrote: Vitantur Nothus wrote: Kindly first remove vehicles from Ambush. Despite their being reportedly underpowered, they're used at every opportunity (and to great effect) by stomp squads. A real head scratcher. Reason they're used by stomp squads is because they are effectively infantry herders (getting infantry pinned) making killing much easier for the infantry stompers. They are also decoys to get some AV out, making the AVers easy kills for the infantry stompers. And the longer you are on field and in the main areas of activity the more players you push into the AV role making infantry attacks progressively more and more effective. Might someone call this a "meaningful role"?
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 16537	Posted - 2015.01.13 01:35:00 - [32] - Quote Vitantur Nothus wrote: True Adamance wrote: LUGMOS wrote: Vitantur Nothus wrote: Kindly first remove vehicles from Ambush. Despite their being reportedly underpowered, they're used at every opportunity (and to great effect) by stomp squads. A real head scratcher. Reason they're used by stomp squads is because they are effectively infantry herders (getting infantry pinned) making killing much easier for the infantry stompers. They are also decoys to get some AV out, making the AVers easy kills for the infantry stompers. And the longer you are on field and in the main areas of activity the more players you push into the AV role making infantry attacks progressively more and more effective. Might someone call this a "meaningful role"? I'd consider this a by produce of simply being deployed. I don't have to fire a shot for this to happen. You could perhaps consider this a role but I honestly don't fancy a role that relies on passive participation. *"He spoke, and we made it so all worlds were one, all peoples were one, all faiths, creeds, and nationalities were one.
Union118 Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 280	Posted - 2015.01.13 03:59:00 - [33] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: No. Lol looks like we got a hater. Starter Fit Suits are OP :-)
Vesta Opalus T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K General Tso's Alliance 300	Posted - 2015.01.13 15:40:00 - [34] - Quote Yokal Bob wrote: Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: then remove proto and adv turrets in the name of fairness :) fine by me not what i was expecting lol, but really what issue are you having with AV? 1. min commando with proto swarms is OP 2. A forge gun is like a hand held turret, however it does far more damage than an actual turret which i find obsurd in my opinion #1 is debatable, #2 is outright false, large missile and large rails do far more damage for more quickly
Jack McReady DUST University Ivy League 1774	Posted - 2015.01.13 15:50:00 - [35] - Quote shield tanked vehicles work fine. hardener up and I have 30 seconds of "your AV is useless" when I dont overextend into fluxes / remotes because the only ranged anti shield option is the PLC which can be dodged even in HAV then I go back and return to repeat the carnage. it is simply the abundance of anti armor AV and the lack of the anti shield ones. Yokal Bob wrote: 1. min commando with proto swarms is OP damage difference between minmatar commando with 2 damage mods and any other suit that can fit 3 damage mods is... ... wait for it ... NEGLIGIBLE
WARxion ForDUST G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance 324	Posted - 2015.01.13 15:52:00 - [36] - Quote Yokal Bob wrote: LUGMOS wrote: Oh no... Here come the pitchforks. Why must it come to this? because a forgegun can take out more than half a tanks armour in one hit -_- not everyone likes shield tanking SHITFIT Yes, I'm that desperate...
Lazer Fo Cused Shining Flame Amarr Empire 432	Posted - 2015.01.13 16:06:00 - [37] - Quote 1. Fine by me
Riptalis Horizons' Edge 159	Posted - 2015.01.13 16:10:00 - [38] - Quote I could deal with this, but ground might keep whining. And still no ADV and proto vehicles... :( Python pilot Logistics mk.0 Assault mk.0
Soraya Xel Abandoned Privilege Top Men. 5343	Posted - 2015.01.13 16:41:00 - [39] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: No. CPM1 Elect. Thanks for all your support. [email protected] for ideas, thoughts, and feedback.
Lac Nokomis Palliative 34	Posted - 2015.01.13 16:49:00 - [40] - Quote How about we just leave this subject alone until the Rattati era team lays out their vehicle gameplay? This is just useless crying that won't be relevant once the vehicles are reintroduced. We could fix this, tighten the dispersion on that, buff the re-gen on this, nerf the speed on that. However we'd just be wasting our time. Please just save all of that conversation for when they re-introduce vehicles. Link to post from dev explaining they are still working on it. Also confirms community's inability to not be little children. Don't waste your time getting personal with these fights. It's not worth it and it's only lengthening our time with useless vehicles. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2562727#post2562727

Breakin Stuff Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 6383	Posted - 2015.01.13 17:20:00 - [41] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: No. because? i want a valid argument for your rejection. otherwise it should be considered as i stated in the interest of fairness Sagaris. this. I will see your sagaris and raise you one surya EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 18287	Posted - 2015.01.13 17:26:00 - [42] - Quote Breakin Stuff wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Yokal Bob wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: No. because? i want a valid argument for your rejection. otherwise it should be considered as i stated in the interest of fairness Sagaris. this. I will see your sagaris and raise you one surya I raise you one zitro. CPM 1 Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior \\= Prototype Forge Gun=// Unlocked
Thor Odinson42 Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 5735	Posted - 2015.01.13 17:52:00 - [43] - Quote I've said it a million times, AV and vehicles will NEVER get balanced when you have droves of solo players in pubs. PC is the only place that AV and vehicles could ever be properly balanced and only a tiny fraction of players participate in it. I'd be all for vehicles being removed from pubs until the playerbase is capable of dealing with it (not 80% of players being solo). Low payouts ensure that only the best are running decent gear.


Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.