Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Juno Tristan
Obscure Reference
237
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 00:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
So why do they auto target Vehicles but not infantry? |
Forever ETC
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
936
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 01:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
The turret installations need to be reworked completely. Their AI is either useless or targets one vehicle only for the rest of the match.
No one does it better than PIE
Lasers4life
"Jesus!" yelled the blues "No, my name is Forever"
|
Atiim
Titans of Phoenix
14992
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 01:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
In my opinion they shouldn't auto-target anything unless provoked, meaning that you have to actually use it if you want to reap the benefits of it's existence.
The 1st Matari Commando
-HAND
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
5007
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 02:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
The AI in this game should target anything that isn't blue. If not there's no point in hacking them back in the first place.
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ.
LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
7122
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 02:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:The AI in this game should target anything that isn't blue. If not there's no point in hacking them back in the first place. Like they did with the red null cannons?
Stupid turrets...
Thunderbolt. verb and noun.
"James thunderbolted in his pants."
"I lit a bag of thunderbolt on fire on CCP's doorway"
|
Llast 326
An Arkhos
6509
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 02:09:00 -
[6] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:The AI in this game should target anything that isn't blue. If not there's no point in hacking them back in the first place. Like they did with the red null cannons? Stupid turrets... Ah the memories Four Turrets all targeting the Null Canon on the Bridge
MOAR Ladders
|
Bahirae Serugiusu
Vendetta Reactionary Force
460
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 02:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:The AI in this game should target anything that isn't blue. If not there's no point in hacking them back in the first place. But then tankers will start complaining that they might be killed for their inattention...AGAIN
The State will always survive.
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
5009
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 03:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
Bahirae Serugiusu wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:The AI in this game should target anything that isn't blue. If not there's no point in hacking them back in the first place. But then tankers will start complaining that they might be killed for their inattention...AGAIN Oh sh*t! You mean they'll actually have to rely on other people to hack installations or do it themselves! Impossible!
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ.
LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
|
Juno Tristan
Obscure Reference
239
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 03:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:Bahirae Serugiusu wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:The AI in this game should target anything that isn't blue. If not there's no point in hacking them back in the first place. But then tankers will start complaining that they might be killed for their inattention...AGAIN Oh sh*t! You mean they'll actually have to rely on other people to hack installations or do it themselves! Impossible!
I don't understand your train of thought
Tankers destroy installations because infantry don't care enough to keep them blue and therefore are a threat
if installations target infantry, maybe they would care enough to ensure they aren't turned as easily |
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
5009
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 03:38:00 -
[10] - Quote
Juno Tristan wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:Bahirae Serugiusu wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:The AI in this game should target anything that isn't blue. If not there's no point in hacking them back in the first place. But then tankers will start complaining that they might be killed for their inattention...AGAIN Oh sh*t! You mean they'll actually have to rely on other people to hack installations or do it themselves! Impossible! I don't understand your train of thought Tankers destroy installations because infantry don't care enough to keep them blue and therefore are a threat if installations target infantry, maybe they would care enough to ensure they aren't turned as easily Your statement is my train of thought
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ.
LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
|
|
Joel II X
Bacon with a bottle of Quafe
5417
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 03:39:00 -
[11] - Quote
Something, something, teamwork.
Something, something, QQ. |
Juno Tristan
Obscure Reference
239
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 04:05:00 -
[12] - Quote
Joel II X wrote:Something, something, teamwork.
Something, something, QQ.
I guess I'm just highlighting the rather terrible gameplay turrets create;
spawn in a rail tank destroy turrets recall bring in a blaster tank/ADS |
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
16494
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 04:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:Bahirae Serugiusu wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:The AI in this game should target anything that isn't blue. If not there's no point in hacking them back in the first place. But then tankers will start complaining that they might be killed for their inattention...AGAIN Oh sh*t! You mean they'll actually have to rely on other people to hack installations or do it themselves! Impossible!
Maybe is infantry were competent enough to capture them and understand their importance on the field with their own vehicles we wouldn't have to.
But in this instance even 2 years down the road an infantry player cannot do the smart thing and capture a damned turret.
*"He spoke, and we made it so all worlds were one, all peoples were one, all faiths, creeds, and nationalities were one.
|
Sgt Kirk
Fatal Absolution
9183
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 04:11:00 -
[14] - Quote
I wish Turrets could auto attack anything over a certain scan profile.
In addition to that id like Turrets to be player called assets.
I feel turrets need a overhaul in general, and it needs to be more of a threat and player based.
CCP holds the Caldari's hand so this doesn't happen again.
|
echo47
Sacrilege of Fatal Arms
274
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 04:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
Juno Tristan wrote:So why do they auto target Vehicles but not infantry?
To make the game easier, just the way the playerbase likes it.
I would rather look bad and win, than look good and lose.
|
Juno Tristan
Obscure Reference
240
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 04:34:00 -
[16] - Quote
Sgt Kirk wrote:I wish Turrets could auto attack anything over a certain scan profile.
In addition to that id like Turrets to be player called assets.
I feel turrets need a overhaul in general, and it needs to be more of a threat and player based.
For your consideration
|
Operative 1174 Uuali
Y.A.M.A.H
272
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 05:04:00 -
[17] - Quote
Joel II X wrote:Something, something, teamwork.
Something, something, QQ.
Blah, blah, blah something about casual, solo pubs vs. Tryhard organized premades. Blah, blah, blah.
No, the answer is to put that damn choice on the options menu to good use. You know, the one under Off Map Support? And add some Goddam* racial parity, including artillery to make this game officially finished.
I don't know about you non-EVE console players, but this game is never finished until we have all four races represented on everyhing including some muthaf*ckin' Khanid sh*t.
I'm better than laser focused; I'm hybrid focused.
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
5011
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 05:22:00 -
[18] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:Bahirae Serugiusu wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:The AI in this game should target anything that isn't blue. If not there's no point in hacking them back in the first place. But then tankers will start complaining that they might be killed for their inattention...AGAIN Oh sh*t! You mean they'll actually have to rely on other people to hack installations or do it themselves! Impossible! Maybe is infantry were competent enough to capture them and understand their importance on the field with their own vehicles we wouldn't have to. But in this instance even 2 years down the road an infantry player cannot do the smart thing and capture a damned turret. It all just comes down to communication. Which isn't such a big problem for me since all I play is FW, I understand the viewpoint of vehicles specialist, I just think it'll add a new level of "team play".
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ.
LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
5011
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 05:24:00 -
[19] - Quote
Sgt Kirk wrote:I wish Turrets could auto attack anything over a certain scan profile.
In addition to that id like Turrets to be player called assets.
I feel turrets need a overhaul in general, and it needs to be more of a threat and player based. Agreed, there should be a new AI system called detection. There was another thread about mines where someone said people with low profile wouldn't set off infantry mines which I thought was cool.
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ.
LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
|
RemingtonBeaver
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1706
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 05:33:00 -
[20] - Quote
What I would do:
Blue turrets target all red.
Red turrets target all blue.
Neutral turrets target everything.
I think turrets should be made impossible to ignore.
Turrets do not target scouts.
This way scouts have to clear a path for vehicles and infantry.
This pushes scouts into a more scout like role.
Increase the amount of turrets by just moving turrets out of the redline and concentrate them more centrally on the map.
Turrets cannot be manned. The hacker of the turret gets kills added, but at assist points.
Go Here
and vote! 1 like is 1 vote!
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |