|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
5007
   |
Posted - 2015.01.11 02:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
The AI in this game should target anything that isn't blue. If not there's no point in hacking them back in the first place.
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ.
LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
5009
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 03:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
Bahirae Serugiusu wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:The AI in this game should target anything that isn't blue. If not there's no point in hacking them back in the first place. But then tankers will start complaining that they might be killed for their inattention...AGAIN
Oh sh*t! You mean they'll actually have to rely on other people to hack installations or do it themselves! Impossible!
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ.
LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
5009
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 03:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
Juno Tristan wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:Bahirae Serugiusu wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:The AI in this game should target anything that isn't blue. If not there's no point in hacking them back in the first place. But then tankers will start complaining that they might be killed for their inattention...AGAIN Oh sh*t! You mean they'll actually have to rely on other people to hack installations or do it themselves! Impossible! I don't understand your train of thought Tankers destroy installations because infantry don't care enough to keep them blue and therefore are a threat if installations target infantry, maybe they would care enough to ensure they aren't turned as easily
Your statement is my train of thought
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ.
LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
5011
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 05:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:Bahirae Serugiusu wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:The AI in this game should target anything that isn't blue. If not there's no point in hacking them back in the first place. But then tankers will start complaining that they might be killed for their inattention...AGAIN Oh sh*t! You mean they'll actually have to rely on other people to hack installations or do it themselves! Impossible! Maybe is infantry were competent enough to capture them and understand their importance on the field with their own vehicles we wouldn't have to. But in this instance even 2 years down the road an infantry player cannot do the smart thing and capture a damned turret.
It all just comes down to communication. Which isn't such a big problem for me since all I play is FW, I understand the viewpoint of vehicles specialist, I just think it'll add a new level of "team play".
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ.
LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
5011
|
Posted - 2015.01.11 05:24:00 -
[5] - Quote
Sgt Kirk wrote:I wish Turrets could auto attack anything over a certain scan profile.
In addition to that id like Turrets to be player called assets.
I feel turrets need a overhaul in general, and it needs to be more of a threat and player based.
Agreed, there should be a new AI system called detection. There was another thread about mines where someone said people with low profile wouldn't set off infantry mines which I thought was cool.
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ.
LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
|
|
|
| |
|