| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
KING CHECKMATE
Opus Arcana
Covert Intervention
6858
   |
Posted - 2015.01.05 21:28:00 -
[31] - Quote
LUGMOS wrote:One thing I don't get...
Infantry doesn't have to necessarily sacrifice survivability (HP mods) if they fit a sidearm and grenade.
.
A Sidearm and a grenade wont save you from infantry vs Infantry if you are playing vs skilled players. Regardless of how skilled you are.
So equipping a Swarm launcher in your Light slot already decreases your chances of surviving a firefight by at least 50%.
If you dont believe me, Go against ANY gk-mk-ak-gk.0 Assault with a SIDEARM and a GRENADE only and taste the rainbow.
Playing as : Calscout + Amarr Assault
|
Sir Dukey
Murphys-Law
General Tso's Alliance
1470
|
Posted - 2015.01.05 21:30:00 -
[32] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=186852&find=unread
Acquire Currency, Disregard Female Canis lupus familiaris
|
TEBOW BAGGINS
GREATNESS ACHIEVED THRU TROLLING
1510
|
Posted - 2015.01.05 21:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
no need to make SL sidearm just buff the flaylock dmg vs vehicle.. we don't need any lock on for that if you can't hit vehicle with FL then you need to practice hitting the side of a barn more. or make a flaylock variant for vehicle damage.. any more lock on weapons need to not be added. for whatever reason it was decided to buff the skilless SL when they could've given it to PLC or flaylock, they did buff the PLC but it wasn't enough so they everbuffed the SL next.. when they should have buffed the PLC dmg vs vehicle even more instead of SL.. or given more AV the power to the flaylock.. they chose to give it to the scrubiest weapon.
AKA Zirzo Valcyn
AFKing since 2012
|
MINA Longstrike
Kirjuun Heiian
1844
|
Posted - 2015.01.05 22:43:00 -
[34] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:More clinically insane drooling from someone with an irrational fear and hatred for vehicles.
Quick question SPKR. What other FPS games have you played , while using exclusively vehicles?
I have to say that this is an incredibly loaded question, as no other FPS game that I'm aware of even allows vehicles to be a 'primary role', in fact they balance things around vehicles being temporary powerups and give infantry the ability to slaughter vehicles with ease otherwise vehicles would make them incredibly mad and frustrated.
I personally feel that LAV's should be the 'infantry support / anti-infantry vehicle' with Logistics LAV's offering incredibly powerful temporary support bonuses to nearby infantry and standard lav's with turrets being a thing of nightmares. This puts MAV's in the position of slightly more generalized roles with different 'squad assisting' roles, and then it puts tanks in the position of being the 'vehicle remover'.
This is something that you can even see in games like dawn of war 2 multiplayer (which is an RTS), where the light vehicles are the ones that are actually fairly lethal to infantry and provide huge support bonuses, but when the actual tanks come out their role is largely oriented around clearing the field of other vehicles.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
Hynox Xitio
Molon Labe.
General Tso's Alliance
1900
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 00:01:00 -
[35] - Quote
Remove all vehicles.
The horror! The horror!
( -íº -£-û -íº)
|
KING CHECKMATE
Opus Arcana
Covert Intervention
6866
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 00:16:00 -
[36] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:
I have to say that this is an incredibly loaded question, as no other FPS game that I'm aware of even allows vehicles to be a 'primary role',
BS. My BEst friend (Who i play most FPS with) Played exclusively Vehicles in BF3.
Choppas, Jets , APC's and Tanks alike,
Playing as : Calscout + Amarr Assault
|
TIGER SHARK1501
Savage Bullet
92
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:48:00 -
[37] - Quote
Hynox Xitio wrote:Remove all vehicles.
No |
Bethhy
Ancient Exiles.
2939
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:51:00 -
[38] - Quote
Bethhy wrote:Personally Before any nerf or buff further of any vehicles or AV..
We should be asking for Racial parity with VEhicles....
We should ask for Minmatar and Amarrian vehicles....
Minmatar tanks With Giant HMG gattling guns on it... Artillery long range weapons...
Amarr with just Pulse laser turrets and Beam laser turrets....
Logistic vehicles reworked and added... Actual Proto and Advanced Tanks added and prices readjusted...
Even starting with Minmatar and Amarrian LAV's.... The Minmatar LAV is so sweet.... Balancing LAV's and bringing them more into use...
Lets start at LAV's...
Tanks and jumping straight to tank vs infantry... Needs to wait... We need to have all the pieces of the game then we can balance... Or we are just wasting time and effort for nothing.
Vehicles need to be finished... This is what we need to be petitioning for. |
DeadlyAztec11
Ostrakon Agency
6873
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:59:00 -
[39] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Buwaro Draemon wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:
Or Give them Dumb Fire.
*flashbacks back to Replication build* No please. If you think Scouts running around and tossing RE's all over the place, would you want to see them jumping all over the place shooting dumb swarms at you? Especially with the changes to MyoStims that would allow the user of MyoStims jump higher? Yeah, no. *shivers* I play scout.And yes. I would LOVE this. I've always been a Pro Noob tuber....
Why does everyone pretend like we couldn't just have a distance before arming? How hard would it be to prevent missiles from exploding before running thirty meters?
Put your flags up in the sky.
And wave them side to side.
Show the world where you're from.
Show the world we are one.
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
16432
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 03:04:00 -
[40] - Quote
Bethhy wrote:Bethhy wrote:Personally Before any nerf or buff further of any vehicles or AV..
We should be asking for Racial parity with VEhicles....
We should ask for Minmatar and Amarrian vehicles....
Minmatar tanks With Giant HMG gattling guns on it... Artillery long range weapons...
Amarr with just Pulse laser turrets and Beam laser turrets....
Logistic vehicles reworked and added... Actual Proto and Advanced Tanks added and prices readjusted...
Even starting with Minmatar and Amarrian LAV's.... The Minmatar LAV is so sweet.... Balancing LAV's and bringing them more into use...
Lets start at LAV's...
Tanks and jumping straight to tank vs infantry... Needs to wait... We need to have all the pieces of the game then we can balance... Or we are just wasting time and effort for nothing. Vehicles need to be finished... This is what we need to be petitioning for.
You should never ask for rapid firing Main Guns on HAV. Not only are they highly inappropriate but take little to no effort to use (and I'm not normally one to talk about in game "skillz" but ******* hell all the dust turret fire so rapidly).
*"He spoke, and we made it so all worlds were one, all peoples were one, all faiths, creeds, and nationalities were one.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |