|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
379
   |
Posted - 2015.01.04 09:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
I mean really why are they even here if infrantry don't want to be killed even suppressed by them.
They want tanks to be AV? You guys already have arguably op av. Theres nothing good for us here but to be killed by each other or the AVers.
Now if we were to be used to suppress infrantry and of course tanks will still be av but missiles could damage them a bit weakening them so infrantry could come in and finish them off same for blasters just better at it. Give rail tanks splash but greatly reduce the damage on infrantry for suppression.
Now don't mistake this for slaying I want the infrantry to be suppressed in a place like a Shepard and sheep.
Also I ould like this to come with surpression points (yes kind of like battlefield)
Caldari Loyalist
I speak for the rabbits
Dictator of the Caldari State.
|
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
379
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 09:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Lolworthy thread is lolworthy.
Then what is our role?
Caldari Loyalist
I speak for the rabbits
Dictator of the Caldari State.
|
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
379
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 09:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
Draden Brohiem wrote:You're wasting your time?! Here come the trolls.....
Yea I expect the trolls to roll in :-/
Caldari Loyalist
I speak for the rabbits
Dictator of the Caldari State.
|
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
379
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 09:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
I have 2 proto turrets missile and blaster and I have gunnlogi and maddie.
What do you speak of?
Caldari Loyalist
I speak for the rabbits
Dictator of the Caldari State.
|
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
379
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 09:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
Acturus Galaxy wrote:Not sure what the problem is, my soma with mlt and basic stuff can get 11 kill and 14 vehicle kill assists from the small turrets. It only cost me 90k. If rail would get splash everyone would use rails and snipe all other installations, infantry and vehicles from far away.
Using my soma I mostly fear rail tanks that only need two hits sniping from the red line or missile tanks destroying me in one sec.
Two small blasters are great at infantry suppresion. All I have is 900k sp in vehicles.
Yea the comment about rail turrets is very true I was questioning myself while putting down the splash with minimal damage to infrantry.
Caldari Loyalist
I speak for the rabbits
Dictator of the Caldari State.
|
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
379
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 10:25:00 -
[6] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:So tankers want to go back how it was a cupule of builds ago ?
That was when almost a hole team could fire on a tank and he just sat there out reping everything.
Yeah right
From the bottom of my hart
Go **** your self
Yea I never said anything about ehp or reping so please silence your ignorant thoughts.
Caldari Loyalist
I speak for the rabbits
Dictator of the Caldari State.
|
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
380
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 10:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:So tankers want to go back how it was a cupule of builds ago ?
That was when almost a hole team could fire on a tank and he just sat there out reping everything.
Yeah right
From the bottom of my hart
Go **** your self
And also we do deserve to be have a presence on the battle field you guys should require team work to destroy a 400k + vehicle just as you guys want us to use team work. Because if one swarmer can destroy us but the community believes we shouldn't be able to touch you then clearly there's some wrong.
Caldari Loyalist
I speak for the rabbits
Dictator of the Caldari State.
|
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
380
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 11:02:00 -
[8] - Quote
 True Adamance wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:So tankers want to go back how it was a cupule of builds ago ?
That was when almost a hole team could fire on a tank and he just sat there out reping everything.
Yeah right
From the bottom of my hart
Go **** your self That was a build ago and that was horrible. Tanks are boring as hell because of that. Maybe back to 1.6...... yeah..... tanks were nice back then.
having Veteran dreams there.
Caldari Loyalist
I speak for the rabbits
Dictator of the Caldari State.
|
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
384
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 18:04:00 -
[9] - Quote
Why thank you.
Caldari Loyalist
I speak for the rabbits
Dictator of the Caldari State.
|
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
384
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 18:17:00 -
[10] - Quote
Piraten Hovnoret wrote:JARREL THOMAS wrote:Piraten Hovnoret wrote:So tankers want to go back how it was a cupule of builds ago ?
That was when almost a hole team could fire on a tank and he just sat there out reping everything.
Yeah right
From the bottom of my hart
Go **** your self And also we do deserve to be have a presence on the battle field you guys should require team work to destroy a 400k + vehicle just as you guys want us to use team work. Because if one swarmer can destroy us but the community believes we shouldn't be able to touch you then clearly there's some wrong. My average suit cost 220k isk bud. ( with 300-600hp ) a militia suit can f-u-c-k me up any day and that is as it should be. You just want easy/God mode. So your scrubby tank that cost 400+k is not expensive. Also typical that tankers belive spaming tanks is something that should be a basic right in the game. If anything militia tanks should be more expensive. Typical tankers, scrubby as always. Ps there are some of you that have my respect, you kick as always in your tanks regardless of build and cost.
There is a large difference between an infrantry and a tank your suit cost 220k after these tanks get out that point will be invalid with tanks costing 2.6 mill at times is that still balanced?
You guys needing teamwork to kill us isn't even a matter of isk now that I think about it. It's just common sense not everything needs one person to destroy it.
Caldari Loyalist
If infrantry that don't own vehicles can't balance their own mechanics balance vehicles?
|
|
|
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
385
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 19:06:00 -
[11] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:JARREL THOMAS wrote:I mean really why are they even here if infrantry don't want to be killed even suppressed by them.
They want tanks to be AV? You guys already have arguably op av. Theres nothing good for us here but to be killed by each other or the AVers.
Now if we were to be used to suppress infrantry and of course tanks will still be av but missiles could damage them a bit weakening them so infrantry could come in and finish them off same for blasters just better at it. Give rail tanks splash but greatly reduce the damage on infrantry for suppression.
Now don't mistake this for slaying I want the infrantry to be suppressed in a place like a Shepard and sheep.
Also I ould like this to come with surpression points (yes kind of like battlefield) Arguably? No, there's no argument about it. AV is absolutely OP.
Yea I was attempting to avoid that argument to get straight to the point.
Caldari Loyalist
If infrantry that don't own vehicles can't balance their own mechanics balance vehicles?
|
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
386
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 19:50:00 -
[12] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:JARREL THOMAS wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:JARREL THOMAS wrote:I mean really why are they even here if infrantry don't want to be killed even suppressed by them.
They want tanks to be AV? You guys already have arguably op av. Theres nothing good for us here but to be killed by each other or the AVers.
Now if we were to be used to suppress infrantry and of course tanks will still be av but missiles could damage them a bit weakening them so infrantry could come in and finish them off same for blasters just better at it. Give rail tanks splash but greatly reduce the damage on infrantry for suppression.
Now don't mistake this for slaying I want the infrantry to be suppressed in a place like a Shepard and sheep.
Also I ould like this to come with surpression points (yes kind of like battlefield) Arguably? No, there's no argument about it. AV is absolutely OP. Yea I was attempting to avoid that argument to get straight to the point. There's no reason to avoid that point.
There's a definite truth there
Caldari Loyalist
Why should infrantry that don't own vehicles can't balance their own mechanics, balance vehicles?
|
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
387
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 20:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
Operative 1174 Uuali wrote:True Adamance wrote:Lolworthy thread is lolworthy. OP is indeed stating what tanks were actually designed for GÇô trench warfare, i.e., to clear out infantry and prevent a stalemate situation.
Yes to that effect I guess.
Caldari Loyalist
Why should infrantry that don't own vehicles can't balance their own mechanics, balance vehicles?
|
JARREL THOMAS
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
397
|
Posted - 2015.01.18 18:04:00 -
[14] - Quote
Alaika Arbosa wrote:LUGMOS wrote:Alaika Arbosa wrote:If all you want to do is "suppress" infantry, why not make all turrets do 2 damage with 1 splash (for those who want splash added)?
By suppress, you mean murder by the CRU load, admit it.
If you get vehicles that can "suppress" infantry like that, then we should get AV that can OHK every vehicle (on the map all at once).
I am all for coming to a sensible balance, IDK how true that is for you though.... Look up suppress and reevaluate your post. Kthx bai. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=suppressThere you go. I stand by my argument, any interpretation of suppress which is to be taken as "murder by the CRU load" is unacceptable just as I assume an AV weapon that OHKs all vehicle on the map at once is unacceptable to vehicle operators. Stop like farming from the extremist vehicle operators and start working more with the moderates.
You do realize that the second definition had restrain right?
Caldari Loyalist
Why should infrantry that don't own vehicles, that can't balance their own mechanics, balance vehicles
|
|
|
| |
|