If you think removing passive ISK ruined PC then I have a bridge to sell you. Unless you are saying you are a coward that intentionally avoided fighting in order to reap rewards without effort equal to those rewards.

A lot of the ideas and proposals actually came from players just like yourself, but if you want to call yourself a source of bad ideas that's fine.

Wait since when was Titans of Penis in Tso's.

Well I guess you guys are better than Cap Acq when it comes to the whole not being 14 thing.

The tough part is guiding them after giving them the district.

I've actually considered just joining some of these smaller corps and helping them from the inside. It's literally the only way to make sure things are done in a way that doesn't just end up frustrating them with the end result.

Lol giving away districts thats a horrible thing to do to corps new to pc unless they can take and districts on their own your just setting them up for an Ass Kicking.Getting districts aint hard infact i started PC in a small corp called "The Third Day" we with some help from more experienced PC players took over a whole planet and kept it ourselves till the Real World caused us to stop playing Dust.

In a sense I agree with you. If this game still had the necessary structure, that would be fine and well.

I just don't see this community as being big enough any more. The gap between top players and new players only grows wider with each passing day, so while you may have been able to work up with the third day (they were cool btw, didn't someone start reviving them recently?) recruiting players and training them, consider that these new players were playing in a time when the top SP players had what 20-40M SP?
now we've got players with more than double that, the pool of fresh talent is beyond miniscule, and lastly there's not enough corps in a lower bracket of competition anymore.
You used to be able to fight moderately difficult battles increasing until you felt ready to fight the top dogs. That isn't there any more, so without people helping new corps get on the map to train vs eachother, their only option is to get a district and what, attack entire alliance teams by themselves?
None of the options in front of us are truly ideal, I think, for PC at its finest, but given the tools we have to work with I'd say a combined community effort to get and train new corps on the map is the best course of action to keep some fun going in a game we would all love to say is doing better than it is.

When did I say any single thing about making any decisions for any other corps? I said I think to get better PCs as a whole, putting more people in it only makes sense.

You've been out of the loop for a very long time tex, you're reputation as a player is an average at best player who is 'that guy' for CA. Every corp has to have one, Roman had 8213, a lot of people would say we have SoTa. We've put 13 corps on the map in less than a couple weeks, which is something many corps just couldn't seem to figure out how to do despite how much they loved to say they were helping. My character is not in question, and you're certainly in no position to be questioning it.

I can go back over all the arguments that were made when you were certain that us changing names made us' failures' and even though were capable of putting a beat-down on the battlefield, it didn't matter because we would be over in 30 days anyways but 30 days has long come and gone, and were still here, doing a lot more to try and solve the same ''only the same corps in PC'' problem that you've been unable to do anything but complain about.

Now how about fixing that attitude problem like I asked you before?

Is that why he gets told to pipe down by his leadership? You want something done in CA, you talk to Shep, anything else is secondary.
If Tex's opinion made a difference, CA would be at war with me right now. When Tex stops trolling, it's cause Shep told him to stop trolling.
The official '8213' of CA