DUST Search - To: YScrubbs

All Channels

General Discussions

To: YScrubbs

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1889	Posted - 2014.12.30 21:10:00 - [1] - Quote TL;DR: While the Scrambler Rifle can deal more DPS to shields than a Combat Rifle can to armor, it is much more likely that the CR deals more anyway because RoF and burst vs semiauto. I've seen you whining about how much damage a Triple Damage modded Prof. 5 Viziam can do to shields, which can be 1139.4 DPS. Keep in mind that that level of DPS is very difficult to achieve, and it would be more reasonable to expect 650-750 DPS instead. Which is still a lot, but that is to be expected from a weapon that is dealing 135% damage to shields. But then you go on to complain about how there are no weapons that damage armor that fast. You say "if there were weapons that damage armor that fast, they would be nerfed immediatey", or something along that line. When there are in fact 2 of them, and they damage armor even faster than that. The HMG and the Combat Rifle, can both easily deal more than The HMG by its very nature deals a lot of damage, and with proficiency it has much higher DPS than a ScR user can ever hope to consistently deal. And that's a full auto weapon, so you are getting full DPS at all times. A Boundless Combat Rifle with 3 Damage Mods and Proficiency 5 can deal 945.4 DPS to armor. Again, it is very unlikely that you will deal that much DPS consistently, but it is much easier to deal close to that much with the CR than it is with the ScR. I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to deal ~900 Consistent Armor DPS with such a weapon setup. That's a lot of DPS. But again, to be expected, and working as intended. The role of Caldari suits is to whine on the forums.
KING CHECKMATE Opus Arcana Covert Intervention 6645	Posted - 2014.12.30 21:13:00 - [2] - Quote Fizzer XCIV wrote: The HMG by its very nature deals a lot of damage, and with proficiency it has much higher DPS than a ScR user can ever hope to consistently deal. And that's a full auto weapon, so you are getting full DPS at all times. You forgot is a full auto weapon which doesn't even require of you to aim, has 450 bullets and even if its considered a CQ projectile based weapon, somehow it still gets you at 45mts range... Playing as : Calmando, Calscout & Calassault.
Heimdallr69 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 4083	Posted - 2014.12.30 21:18:00 - [3] - Quote Fizzer XCIV wrote: TL;DR: While the Scrambler Rifle can deal more DPS to shields than a Combat Rifle can to armor, it is much more likely that the CR deals more anyway. I've seen you whining about how much damage a Triple Damage modded Prof. 5 Viziam can do to shields, which can be 1139.4 DPS. Keep in mind that that level of DPS is very difficult to achieve, and it would be more reasonable to expect 650-750 DPS instead. Which is still a lot, but that is to be expected from a weapon that is dealing 135% damage to shields. But then you go on to complain about how there are no weapons that damage armor that fast. You say "if there were weapons that damage armor that fast, they would be nerfed immediatey", or something along that line. When there are in fact 2 of them, and they damage armor even faster than that. The HMG and the Combat Rifle, can both easily deal more than The HMG by its very nature deals a lot of damage, and with proficiency it has much higher DPS than a ScR user can ever hope to consistently deal. And that's a full auto weapon, so you are getting full DPS at all times. A Boundless Combat Rifle with 3 Damage Mods and Proficiency 5 can deal 945.4 DPS to armor. Again, it is very unlikely that you will deal that much DPS consistently, but it is much easier to deal close to that much with the CR than it is with the ScR. I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to deal ~900 Consistent Armor DPS with such a weapon setup. That's a lot of DPS. But again, to be expected, and working as intended. Disagree, scouts have killed me while I'm moving and before my RR can even shoot. I run 509 armor on my gal, that's 80% and still rapes people. It's all about the user. If you have some dumbass miss his charge then only land 2 hits after then he should skill something else. Point is the scr in someones somewhat decent hands can destroy all suits Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
Jack McReady DUST University Ivy League 1683	Posted - 2014.12.30 21:19:00 - [4] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: The HMG by its very nature deals a lot of damage, and with proficiency it has much higher DPS than a ScR user can ever hope to consistently deal. And that's a full auto weapon, so you are getting full DPS at all times. You forgot is a full auto weapon which doesn't even require of you to aim, has 450 bullets and even if its considered a CQ projectile based weapon, somehow it still gets you at 45mts range... this and regarding CR, well if you have problems with it then fit shield extenders or just use a shield tanked suit instead of camping on a spot with an armor tanked suit...
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1890	Posted - 2014.12.30 21:25:00 - [5] - Quote Heimdallr69 wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: TL;DR: While the Scrambler Rifle can deal more DPS to shields than a Combat Rifle can to armor, it is much more likely that the CR deals more anyway. I've seen you whining about how much damage a Triple Damage modded Prof. 5 Viziam can do to shields, which can be 1139.4 DPS. Keep in mind that that level of DPS is very difficult to achieve, and it would be more reasonable to expect 650-750 DPS instead. Which is still a lot, but that is to be expected from a weapon that is dealing 135% damage to shields. But then you go on to complain about how there are no weapons that damage armor that fast. You say "if there were weapons that damage armor that fast, they would be nerfed immediatey", or something along that line. When there are in fact 2 of them, and they damage armor even faster than that. The HMG and the Combat Rifle, can both easily deal more than The HMG by its very nature deals a lot of damage, and with proficiency it has much higher DPS than a ScR user can ever hope to consistently deal. And that's a full auto weapon, so you are getting full DPS at all times. A Boundless Combat Rifle with 3 Damage Mods and Proficiency 5 can deal 945.4 DPS to armor. Again, it is very unlikely that you will deal that much DPS consistently, but it is much easier to deal close to that much with the CR than it is with the ScR. I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to deal ~900 Consistent Armor DPS with such a weapon setup. That's a lot of DPS. But again, to be expected, and working as intended. Disagree, scouts have killed me while I'm moving and before my RR can even shoot. I run 509 armor on my gal, that's 80% and still rapes people. It's all about the user. If you have some dumbass miss his charge then only land 2 hits after then he should skill something else. Point is the scr in someones somewhat decent hands can destroy all suits I never said it won't. Im just pointing out the hipocricy of calling it OP and unfair when there are 2 similar weapons the do the same thing in the other direction. The role of Caldari suits is to whine on the forums.
Cavani1EE7 Murphys-Law 744	Posted - 2014.12.30 21:26:00 - [6] - Quote Fizzer XCIV wrote: TL;DR: While the Scrambler Rifle can deal more DPS to shields than a Combat Rifle can to armor, it is much more likely that the CR deals more anyway because RoF and burst vs semiauto. I've seen you whining about how much damage a Triple Damage modded Prof. 5 Viziam can do to shields, which can be 1139.4 DPS. Keep in mind that that level of DPS is very difficult to achieve, and it would be more reasonable to expect 650-750 DPS instead. Which is still a lot, but that is to be expected from a weapon that is dealing 135% damage to shields. But then you go on to complain about how there are no weapons that damage armor that fast. You say "if there were weapons that damage armor that fast, they would be nerfed immediatey", or something along that line. When there are in fact 2 of them, and they damage armor even faster than that. The HMG and the Combat Rifle, can both easily deal more than The HMG by its very nature deals a lot of damage, and with proficiency it has much higher DPS than a ScR user can ever hope to consistently deal. And that's a full auto weapon, so you are getting full DPS at all times. A Boundless Combat Rifle with 3 Damage Mods and Proficiency 5 can deal 945.4 DPS to armor. Again, it is very unlikely that you will deal that much DPS consistently, but it is much easier to deal close to that much with the CR than it is with the ScR. I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to deal ~900 Consistent Armor DPS with such a weapon setup. That's a lot of DPS. But again, to be expected, and working as intended. I would dare to say an ScR is scarier than a HMG at its optimal range for a shield tanker. Plus anytime I get killed by a ScR it shows up it dealt me 1100-1500 damage. Anyways you suck, while dubbs doesn't, therefore your statements are invalid. 10100111001 Shield tanking is hard mode /period. 10100111001
gustavo acosta Capital Acquisitions LLC 651	Posted - 2014.12.30 21:32:00 - [7] - Quote Cavani1EE7 wrote: I would dare to say an ScR is scarier than a HMG at its optimal range for a shield tanker. Plus anytime I get killed by a ScR it shows up it dealt me 1100-1500 damage. HMG isn't scary at all when you're a shield user trust me I've tanked through so much hmg damage in my min scout. Running/Movement=Shield suits' strongest weapons. GimmeDatSuhWeet isk
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1890	Posted - 2014.12.30 21:33:00 - [8] - Quote Cavani1EE7 wrote: I would dare to say an ScR is scarier than a HMG at its optimal range for a shield tanker. Plus anytime I get killed by a ScR it shows up it dealt me 1100-1500 damage. Anyways you suck, while dubbs doesn't, therefore your statements are invalid. You do realize how the "Damage Dealt" stat works right? And how it is basically meaningless... It keeps track of ALL the damage that player has dealt to you throughout that entire life. I've had 3000+ Damage Dealt to me by someone using an ACR. Doesn't mean much. The role of Caldari suits is to whine on the forums.
Forlorn Destrier Havok Dynasty 3102	Posted - 2014.12.30 21:49:00 - [9] - Quote Fizzer XCIV wrote: TL;DR: While the Scrambler Rifle can deal more DPS to shields than a Combat Rifle can to armor, it is much more likely that the CR deals more anyway because RoF and burst vs semiauto. I've seen you whining about how much damage a Triple Damage modded Prof. 5 Viziam can do to shields, which can be 1139.4 DPS. Keep in mind that that level of DPS is very difficult to achieve, and it would be more reasonable to expect 650-750 DPS instead. Which is still a lot, but that is to be expected from a weapon that is dealing 135% damage to shields. But then you go on to complain about how there are no weapons that damage armor that fast. You say "if there were weapons that damage armor that fast, they would be nerfed immediatey", or something along that line. When there are in fact 2 of them, and they damage armor even faster than that. The HMG and the Combat Rifle, can both easily deal more than The HMG by its very nature deals a lot of damage, and with proficiency it has much higher DPS than a ScR user can ever hope to consistently deal. And that's a full auto weapon, so you are getting full DPS at all times. A Boundless Combat Rifle with 3 Damage Mods and Proficiency 5 can deal 945.4 DPS to armor. Again, it is very unlikely that you will deal that much DPS consistently, but it is much easier to deal close to that much with the CR than it is with the ScR. I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to deal ~900 Consistent Armor DPS with such a weapon setup. That's a lot of DPS. But again, to be expected, and working as intended. YDubbs is a pretty respected member of the community that puts some thought into what he says. I wouldn't call him a whiner. I've known him for years - you I've never heard of. That said, I gave your post the due attention it deserved, which is to say I'm glad you posted this. I needed to wipe. I am the Forgotten Warhorse, the Lord of Lightning
Fizzer XCIV Heaven's Lost Property Negative-Feedback 1892	Posted - 2014.12.30 21:53:00 - [10] - Quote Forlorn Destrier wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: TL;DR: While the Scrambler Rifle can deal more DPS to shields than a Combat Rifle can to armor, it is much more likely that the CR deals more anyway because RoF and burst vs semiauto. I've seen you whining about how much damage a Triple Damage modded Prof. 5 Viziam can do to shields, which can be 1139.4 DPS. Keep in mind that that level of DPS is very difficult to achieve, and it would be more reasonable to expect 650-750 DPS instead. Which is still a lot, but that is to be expected from a weapon that is dealing 135% damage to shields. But then you go on to complain about how there are no weapons that damage armor that fast. You say "if there were weapons that damage armor that fast, they would be nerfed immediatey", or something along that line. When there are in fact 2 of them, and they damage armor even faster than that. The HMG and the Combat Rifle, can both easily deal more than The HMG by its very nature deals a lot of damage, and with proficiency it has much higher DPS than a ScR user can ever hope to consistently deal. And that's a full auto weapon, so you are getting full DPS at all times. A Boundless Combat Rifle with 3 Damage Mods and Proficiency 5 can deal 945.4 DPS to armor. Again, it is very unlikely that you will deal that much DPS consistently, but it is much easier to deal close to that much with the CR than it is with the ScR. I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to deal ~900 Consistent Armor DPS with such a weapon setup. That's a lot of DPS. But again, to be expected, and working as intended. YDubbs is a pretty respected member of the community that puts some thought into what he says. I wouldn't call him a whiner. I've known him for years - you I've never heard of. That said, I gave your post the due attention it deserved, which is to say I'm glad you posted this. I needed to wipe. I don't respect him. Why should I? He's just another player, he's decent, but not one that commands respect. All he's posted for the last week, like 2-3 threads a day, is about how absolutely **** he thinks shields are. That is whining. He is whining. He is using flawed arguments(so he obviously isn't putting much thought into them), so I'm calling them out. The role of Caldari suits is to whine on the forums.

CrotchGrab 360 Yon Hyaku Nijuu Moyase 1801	Posted - 2014.12.30 22:12:00 - [11] - Quote I love frying shields with the SCR! Stop QQ'ing and leave the weapon alone, it takes skill, the user should be rewarded with insane damage output. Not that I don't overheat like a scrub every now and then...none of my videos so far have been with Amarr Assault Dropsuits Level 5. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPYg1IK-SxY 51-4 with SCR, Blauhelme ragequit! It's not MLT stomping this time! DUST VIDEOS
All Gucci T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K 11	Posted - 2014.12.30 23:26:00 - [12] - Quote Cavani1EE7 wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: TL;DR: While the Scrambler Rifle can deal more DPS to shields than a Combat Rifle can to armor, it is much more likely that the CR deals more anyway because RoF and burst vs semiauto. I've seen you whining about how much damage a Triple Damage modded Prof. 5 Viziam can do to shields, which can be 1139.4 DPS. Keep in mind that that level of DPS is very difficult to achieve, and it would be more reasonable to expect 650-750 DPS instead. Which is still a lot, but that is to be expected from a weapon that is dealing 135% damage to shields. But then you go on to complain about how there are no weapons that damage armor that fast. You say "if there were weapons that damage armor that fast, they would be nerfed immediatey", or something along that line. When there are in fact 2 of them, and they damage armor even faster than that. The HMG and the Combat Rifle, can both easily deal more than The HMG by its very nature deals a lot of damage, and with proficiency it has much higher DPS than a ScR user can ever hope to consistently deal. And that's a full auto weapon, so you are getting full DPS at all times. A Boundless Combat Rifle with 3 Damage Mods and Proficiency 5 can deal 945.4 DPS to armor. Again, it is very unlikely that you will deal that much DPS consistently, but it is much easier to deal close to that much with the CR than it is with the ScR. I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to deal ~900 Consistent Armor DPS with such a weapon setup. That's a lot of DPS. But again, to be expected, and working as intended. I would dare to say an ScR is scarier than a HMG at its optimal range for a shield tanker. Plus anytime I get killed by a ScR it shows up it dealt me 1100-1500 damage. Anyways you suck, while dubbs doesn't, therefore your statements are invalid. you would dare say? lol something so obvious doesn't need to be said.... I've yet to see you in the field...qsync 1v1 me? Emperor Gucci
KING CHECKMATE Opus Arcana Covert Intervention 6656	Posted - 2014.12.30 23:27:00 - [13] - Quote Jack McReady wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: The HMG by its very nature deals a lot of damage, and with proficiency it has much higher DPS than a ScR user can ever hope to consistently deal. And that's a full auto weapon, so you are getting full DPS at all times. You forgot is a full auto weapon which doesn't even require of you to aim, has 450 bullets and even if its considered a CQ projectile based weapon, somehow it still gets you at 45mts range... this and regarding CR, well if you have problems with it then fit shield extenders or just use a shield tanked suit instead of camping on a spot with an armor tanked suit... I......im running Cal suits.... Playing as : Calmando, Calscout & Calassault.
Atiim Titans of Phoenix 14738	Posted - 2014.12.30 23:30:00 - [14] - Quote CrotchGrab 360 wrote: it takes skill No, it honestly doesn't. The 1st Matari Commando -HAND
Greasepalms Ahrendee Mercenaries 702	Posted - 2014.12.30 23:40:00 - [15] - Quote Atiim wrote: CrotchGrab 360 wrote: it takes skill No, it honestly doesn't. It does, actually.
Atiim Titans of Phoenix 14738	Posted - 2014.12.30 23:47:00 - [16] - Quote Greasepalms wrote: Atiim wrote: CrotchGrab 360 wrote: it takes skill No, it honestly doesn't. It does, actually. Not when you have Aim Assist. The 1st Matari Commando -HAND
2Berries Ghosts of Dawn General Tso's Alliance 482	Posted - 2014.12.30 23:50:00 - [17] - Quote Greasepalms wrote: Atiim wrote: CrotchGrab 360 wrote: it takes skill No, it honestly doesn't. It does, actually. Skill, no. Patience & self discipline, only if you are running non-amarr suits. Have you considered a career in costumed aggression?
Dust User KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1356	Posted - 2014.12.30 23:52:00 - [18] - Quote Atiim wrote: Greasepalms wrote: Atiim wrote: CrotchGrab 360 wrote: it takes skill No, it honestly doesn't. It does, actually. Not when you have Aim Assist. Says the swarm guy.
Atiim Titans of Phoenix 14739	Posted - 2014.12.30 23:57:00 - [19] - Quote Dust User wrote: Says the swarm guy. Sure as heck beats roasting marshmallows and singing kumbaya on a tower with a FG. The 1st Matari Commando -HAND
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 3272	Posted - 2014.12.31 00:16:00 - [20] - Quote Greasepalms wrote: Atiim wrote: CrotchGrab 360 wrote: it takes skill No, it honestly doesn't. It does, actually. It takes about as much skill as hitting a brick tanked amarr sentinel with an HMG at 15 meters. "Minja" and "Masochist" are synonyms. FA's Shotgunning T-Dome Champ I piss Remote Explosives and shit Shotgun shells.

Nocturnal Soul Primordial Threat 4908	Posted - 2014.12.31 00:36:00 - [21] - Quote Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Greasepalms wrote: Atiim wrote: CrotchGrab 360 wrote: it takes skill No, it honestly doesn't. It does, actually. It takes about as much skill as hitting a brick tanked amarr sentinel with an HMG at 15 meters. You & I both know it takes a lot of nerve to do such a thing and expect to survive. (Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ. LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
Zindorak G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance 1463	Posted - 2014.12.31 00:41:00 - [22] - Quote Fizzer XCIV wrote: I never said it won't. Im just pointing out the hipocricy of calling it OP and unfair when there are 2 similar weapons the do the same thing in the other direction. Wise words Pokemon master and Tekken Lord Give me da iskiez Gk0 Scout yay :)
Zindorak G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance 1463	Posted - 2014.12.31 00:42:00 - [23] - Quote Greasepalms wrote: Atiim wrote: CrotchGrab 360 wrote: it takes skill No, it honestly doesn't. It does, actually. I takes as much skill as spraying and praying with the RR. Or using Swarm Launchers Pokemon master and Tekken Lord Give me da iskiez Gk0 Scout yay :)
Buwaro Draemon WarRavens Capital Punishment. 526	Posted - 2014.12.31 01:27:00 - [24] - Quote Zindorak wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: I never said it won't. Im just pointing out the hipocricy of calling it OP and unfair when there are 2 similar weapons the do the same thing in the other direction. Wise words There are far more weapons in the field that are anti-armor and that absolutely wreck armor and you don't see armor tankers complaining about it. But god forbid thay the weapon specialozed for destroying shields is powerful against shields. Ydubs is hypocrite and biass. Changes to Damage mods!
Cavani1EE7 Murphys-Law 748	Posted - 2014.12.31 01:30:00 - [25] - Quote Buwaro Draemon wrote: Zindorak wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: I never said it won't. Im just pointing out the hipocricy of calling it OP and unfair when there are 2 similar weapons the do the same thing in the other direction. Wise words There are far more weapons in the field that are anti-armor and that absolutely wreck armor and you don't see armor tankers complaining about it. But god forbid thay the weapon specialozed for destroying shields is powerful against shields. Ydubs is hypocrite and biass. Does the RR/ARR/CR/ACR have a 1s TTK on armor? If so, then you would all be screaming nerf this and nerf that, as if you wouldn't be already doing it. 10100111001 Shield tanking is hard mode /period. 10100111001
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 3273	Posted - 2014.12.31 01:31:00 - [26] - Quote Buwaro Draemon wrote: Zindorak wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: I never said it won't. Im just pointing out the hipocricy of calling it OP and unfair when there are 2 similar weapons the do the same thing in the other direction. Wise words There are far more weapons in the field that are anti-armor and that absolutely wreck armor and you don't see armor tankers complaining about it. But god forbid thay the weapon specialozed for destroying shields is powerful against shields. Ydubs is hypocrite and biass. Yet the anti armor weapons are less effective against armor than shield weapons are against shield, while the armor weapons also do less damage or about the same to shield as shield do to armor. In addition, armor is a naturally stronger tank, which can also stack damage mods. "Minja" and "Masochist" are synonyms. FA's Shotgunning T-Dome Champ I piss Remote Explosives and shit Shotgun shells.
Dust User KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 1358	Posted - 2014.12.31 01:57:00 - [27] - Quote Atiim wrote: Dust User wrote: Says the swarm guy. Sure as heck beats roasting marshmallows and singing kumbaya on a tower with a FG. Who sits on towers these days? What is this, Chromosome?
Michael Arck 6093	Posted - 2014.12.31 02:00:00 - [28] - Quote They will feverishly defend their SCRs to no end. Archistrategos / The 7th Prime / Selah *Where the fear has gone there will be nothing....only I will remain
Nocturnal Soul Primordial Threat 4909	Posted - 2014.12.31 02:04:00 - [29] - Quote Michael Arck wrote: They will feverishly defend their SCRs to no end. No sh*t, we only have three things to kill stuff with. (Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ. LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
Michael Arck 6093	Posted - 2014.12.31 02:06:00 - [30] - Quote Nocturnal Soul wrote: Michael Arck wrote: They will feverishly defend their SCRs to no end. No sht, we only have three things to kill stuff with. So? Archistrategos* / The 7th Prime / Selah *Where the fear has gone there will be nothing....only I will remain

Booby Tuesdays Ahrendee Mercenaries 1181	Posted - 2014.12.31 02:47:00 - [31] - Quote Who is YScrubbs? Half-Assed Forum Warrior / Half-Decent Commando / Damn Good Logi / Matari Loyalty 7
Nocturnal Soul Primordial Threat 4910	Posted - 2014.12.31 02:53:00 - [32] - Quote Michael Arck wrote: Nocturnal Soul wrote: Michael Arck wrote: They will feverishly defend their SCRs to no end. No sh*t, we only have three things to kill stuff with. So? What happens when a weapon gets nerf into the dirt? No one uses it, people spec out of it and it dies all together. Being that we only have one other light weapon that would completely fail you in cqc the Scr is literally the only Amarr weapon a generalist can use for most situations. (Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ. LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
Zindorak G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance 1466	Posted - 2014.12.31 02:57:00 - [33] - Quote Nocturnal Soul wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Nocturnal Soul wrote: Michael Arck wrote: They will feverishly defend their SCRs to no end. No sh*t, we only have three things to kill stuff with. So? What happens when a weapon gets nerf into the dirt? No one uses it, people spec out of it and it dies all together. Being that we only have one other light weapon that would completely fail you in cqc the Scr is literally the only Amarr weapon a generalist can use for most situations. Yea Pokemon master and Tekken Lord Give me da iskiez Gk0 Scout yay :)
Michael Arck 6093	Posted - 2014.12.31 03:05:00 - [34] - Quote Nocturnal Soul wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Nocturnal Soul wrote: Michael Arck wrote: They will feverishly defend their SCRs to no end. No sht, we only have three things to kill stuff with. So? What happens when a weapon gets nerf into the dirt? No one uses it, people spec out of it and it dies all together. Being that we only have one other light weapon that would completely fail you in cqc the Scr is literally the only Amarr weapon a generalist can use for most situations. I can't believe what I'm reading here. And this same mentality goes for the Rail Rifle, right? So it should be returned to its former glory, right? Archistrategos* / The 7th Prime / Selah *Where the fear has gone there will be nothing....only I will remain
Michael Arck 6093	Posted - 2014.12.31 03:06:00 - [35] - Quote Booby Tuesdays wrote: Who is YScrubbs? The former CEO of The Third Day Archistrategos / The 7th Prime / Selah *Where the fear has gone there will be nothing....only I will remain
Atiim Titans of Phoenix 14743	Posted - 2014.12.31 03:10:00 - [36] - Quote Michael Arck wrote: Booby Tuesdays wrote: Who is YScrubbs? The former CEO of The Third Day No the OP is referring to Ydubbs, who is the CEO of RND. The 1st Matari Commando -HAND
Nocturnal Soul Primordial Threat 4910	Posted - 2014.12.31 03:11:00 - [37] - Quote Michael Arck wrote: Nocturnal Soul wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Nocturnal Soul wrote: Michael Arck wrote: They will feverishly defend their SCRs to no end. No sh*t, we only have three things to kill stuff with. So? What happens when a weapon gets nerf into the dirt? No one uses it, people spec out of it and it dies all together. Being that we only have one other light weapon that would completely fail you in cqc the Scr is literally the only Amarr weapon a generalist can use for most situations. I can't believe what I'm reading here. And this same mentality goes for the Rail Rifle, right? So it should be returned to its former glory, right? I don't care for the RR so to ask me about it is a road set to no where. Anyway what I meant about the Scr is to leave it the hell alone it's fine where it's at. Since it implementation people have been saying it's OP or that it's borderline OP(which is fine). (Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ. LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
Kira Lannister Ancient Exiles. 2451	Posted - 2014.12.31 03:15:00 - [38] - Quote Only the unholy would hide behind a magical shield. Witchcraft I say! Our holy weapon was meant to break through such devices. "The Ancient Templars will guard fearlessly the people, the land and the heavens of the empire." Book of Exiles 1:3
Michael Arck 6095	Posted - 2014.12.31 03:15:00 - [39] - Quote Atiim wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Booby Tuesdays wrote: Who is YScrubbs? The former CEO of The Third Day No the OP is referring to Ydubbs, who is the CEO of RND. lol I know that Atiim, I was just joking around Archistrategos / The 7th Prime / Selah *Where the fear has gone there will be nothing....only I will remain
Michael Arck 6095	Posted - 2014.12.31 03:18:00 - [40] - Quote Nocturnal Soul wrote: I don't care for the RR so to ask me about it is a road set to no where. Anyway what I meant about the Scr is to leave it the hell alone it's fine where it's at. Since it implementation people have been saying it's OP or that it's borderline OP(which is fine). I know you don't care. My response to you was to reveal the craziness in you defending a weapon without reason besides the fact that you use it. And this how this game has been balanced, by some folks like you. It's a shame that non objective opinions has altered this game in so many ways. Archistrategos / The 7th Prime / Selah *Where the fear has gone there will be nothing....only I will remain

Booby Tuesdays Ahrendee Mercenaries 1181	Posted - 2014.12.31 03:19:00 - [41] - Quote Michael Arck wrote: Atiim wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Booby Tuesdays wrote: Who is YScrubbs? The former CEO of The Third Day No the OP is referring to Ydubbs, who is the CEO of RND. lol I know that Atiim, I was just joking around . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________ . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-GÇÿGÇ¥. . . . . . . . . .``~., . . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-GÇ¥. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .GÇ£-., . . . . .. . . . . . .. /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GÇ¥:, . . . . . . . .. . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\, . . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,} . . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.} . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:GÇ¥. . . ./ . . . . . . ../. . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./ . . . . . . . /__.(. . .GÇ£~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./ . . . . . . /(_. . GÇ¥~,_. . . ..GÇ£~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/ . . . .. .{.._.;_. . .GÇ¥=,_. . . .GÇ£-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~GÇ¥; /. .. .} . . .. . .((. . .~_. . . .GÇ¥=-._. . .GÇ£;,,./`. . /GÇ¥ . . . ./. .. ../ . . . .. . .\`~,. . ..GÇ£~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../ . . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-GÇ¥ . . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\ . . . . . . \`~.-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\|,./.....\,__ ,,_. . . . . }.>-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\|. . . . . . ..`=~-, . .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\ . . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>--==`` . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _\. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..`\ Half-Assed Forum Warrior / Half-Decent Commando / Damn Good Logi / Matari Loyalty 7
Nocturnal Soul Primordial Threat 4912	Posted - 2014.12.31 03:33:00 - [42] - Quote Michael Arck wrote: Nocturnal Soul wrote: I don't care for the RR so to ask me about it is a road set to no where. Anyway what I meant about the Scr is to leave it the hell alone it's fine where it's at. Since it implementation people have been saying it's OP or that it's borderline OP(which is fine). I know you don't care. My response to you was to reveal the craziness in you defending a weapon without reason besides the fact that you use it. And this how this game has been balanced, by some folks like you. It's a shame that non objective opinions has altered this game in so many ways. Yeah your right but what else do you expect from a guy who has all its sub skills maxed. (Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ. LASERS BTCH!!!!!!
All Gucci T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K 22	Posted - 2015.01.01 01:54:00 - [43] - Quote Michael Arck wrote: Nocturnal Soul wrote: I don't care for the RR so to ask me about it is a road set to no where. Anyway what I meant about the Scr is to leave it the hell alone it's fine where it's at. Since it implementation people have been saying it's OP or that it's borderline OP(which is fine). I know you don't care. My response to you was to reveal the craziness in you defending a weapon without reason besides the fact that you use it. And this how this game has been balanced, by some folks like you. It's a shame that non objective opinions has altered this game in so many ways. Is someone who doesn't use the weapon supposed to defend it? lol how would you find them credible if they have no experience in the matter? Emperor Gucci


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

GimmeDatSuhWeet isk

Pokemon master and Tekken Lord

Give me da iskiez

Gk0 Scout yay :)

Pokemon master and Tekken Lord

Give me da iskiez

Gk0 Scout yay :)

Pokemon master and Tekken Lord

Give me da iskiez

Gk0 Scout yay :)