| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
137
   |
Posted - 2014.12.30 01:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
So this is an anti vehicle weapon. I feel that it resembles a rocket launcher/ bazooka/rpg the most. It's an av weapon, but effective on infantry too. So, I fell like the plasma cannon should have a blast radius increase. It should have just under the mass drivers radius. The damage it causes is ok to not make it better than the mass driver. Just a small radius increase. Who agrees?
48th Special Operations Force.
"As a team or alone, I dominate the battlefield."
|
Banjo Robertson
Random Gunz
RISE of LEGION
387
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 03:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
I don't know about increasing blast radius, but I would like full splash damage to be applied to targets within the radius rather than damage diminishing the further from radius you are. |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
4249
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 04:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
Meh....
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast
www.biomassed.net
|
Kain Spero
Goonfeet
4099
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 06:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
No need to make it better against infantry. I'd rather it get similar direct damage to a breach forge.
Owner of Spero Escrow Services
Follow @KainSpero for Dust and Legion news
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
6068
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 08:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
The DPS is about on par with the IAFG right now. For breach alpha there needs to be a shot slowdown via reloading time.
EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
16345
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 09:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
Lightning35 Delta514 wrote:So this is an anti vehicle weapon. I feel that it resembles a rocket launcher/ bazooka/rpg the most. It's an av weapon, but effective on infantry too. So, I fell like the plasma cannon should have a blast radius increase. It should have just under the mass drivers radius. The damage it causes is ok to not make it better than the mass driver. Just a small radius increase. Who agrees?
Depends on how lethal you think the plasma splash would be.
It already has 3.5m which is fair.
*"He spoke, and we made it so all worlds were one, all peoples were one, all faiths, creeds, and nationalities were one.
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
6069
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 10:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
3.5m blast is currently the largest piece of splash damage in play.
EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
|
Banjo Robertson
Random Gunz
RISE of LEGION
388
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 13:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:3.5m blast is currently the largest piece of splash damage in play.
6 meter blast on mass driver? |
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
137
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 14:09:00 -
[9] - Quote
Banjo Robertson wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:3.5m blast is currently the largest piece of splash damage in play. 6 meter blast on mass driver?
I don't see it bad if it keeps its current splash damage. It would just make it a better area denial weapon. Then the plasma coups go 4m
48th Special Operations Force.
"As a team or alone, I dominate the battlefield."
|
Fizzer XCIV
Heaven's Lost Property
Negative-Feedback
1870
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 14:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
No.
Stop making the Placon Easy mode!
It used to be an awesome weapon that only a select handful of people used. That only a few people had the skills to use. Now anyone can pick them up and kill with it in CQC or long range.
At this rate it will have 4 rounds per reload and a 12m splash by July!
The role of Caldari suits is to whine on the forums.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |