|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
deezy dabest
IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP
1441
   |
Posted - 2014.12.25 06:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
Cal scout hit box not glitched enough to keep you from being slapped by the scr? |
deezy dabest
IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP
1536
|
Posted - 2014.12.25 08:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
Stupid Blueberry wrote:deezy dabest wrote:Cal scout hit box not glitched enough to keep you from being slapped by the scr? when will you retards learn that the hitbox is fine? it's called netcode.
Yes shooting things at close range and it not taking damage is perfectly fine.
Its called **** code is no excuse for **** code.
|
deezy dabest
IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP
1552
|
Posted - 2014.12.25 08:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
What scout listen too while dancing in front of heavies |
deezy dabest
IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP
1557
|
Posted - 2014.12.25 08:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
Stupid Blueberry wrote:Stop trying to derail the thread by yelling like a ****** please, it's not even about the cal scout. A thread starts out as a discussion of service rifles and gets derailed because some idiot yells "cal scout hitbox".
Kind of funny how everyone went along with it. Maybe because its true?
The thread was nothing but a typical "that thing kills me" thread anyway. How can it be derailed any more?
|
deezy dabest
IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP
1582
|
Posted - 2014.12.25 09:25:00 -
[5] - Quote
Stupid Blueberry wrote:The thread was for people's opinions on the weapons, if you happened to read the subject. And how is "that thing kills me" and different from "I can't kill this"?
If you actually read the title and the thread you would see that OP did not ask for other peoples opinions.
He made a statement and left it at that, I simply chose to discuss his statement and you chose to discuss mine.
Give up while you still have a shred of dignity, you are just making yourself look stupid in tons of threads and making me look like an ass for picking on the idiot in the room.
|
deezy dabest
IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP
1584
|
Posted - 2014.12.25 10:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
Stupid Blueberry wrote:deezy dabest wrote:Stupid Blueberry wrote:The thread was for people's opinions on the weapons, if you happened to read the subject. And how is "that thing kills me" and different from "I can't kill this"? If you actually read the title and the thread you would see that OP did not ask for other peoples opinions. He made a statement and left it at that, I simply chose to discuss his statement and you chose to discuss mine. Give up while you still have a shred of dignity, you are just making yourself look stupid in tons of threads and making me look like an ass for picking on the idiot in the room. Not really, you chose to insult him, so I chose to insult you. And the person who's looking stupid would just be a matter of perception, wouldn't it? Hard to tell you're stupid if you ARE stupid. p.s. 2 threads isn't "tons of threads".
What you call an insult is still discussion on his opinion.
As far as perception goes, you have accused me of spewing horse **** when you yourself can not and will not even attempt to back up your own statements, you have flip flopped on your statements, and now all you can do is scream "no I said" so the perception is clear.
You are correct 2 is not tons of threads, guess you got me there. |
deezy dabest
IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP
1584
|
Posted - 2014.12.25 10:31:00 -
[7] - Quote
Stupid Blueberry wrote:deezy dabest wrote:Stupid Blueberry wrote:deezy dabest wrote:Stupid Blueberry wrote:The thread was for people's opinions on the weapons, if you happened to read the subject. And how is "that thing kills me" and different from "I can't kill this"? If you actually read the title and the thread you would see that OP did not ask for other peoples opinions. He made a statement and left it at that, I simply chose to discuss his statement and you chose to discuss mine. Give up while you still have a shred of dignity, you are just making yourself look stupid in tons of threads and making me look like an ass for picking on the idiot in the room. Not really, you chose to insult him, so I chose to insult you. And the person who's looking stupid would just be a matter of perception, wouldn't it? Hard to tell you're stupid if you ARE stupid. p.s. 2 threads isn't "tons of threads". What you call an insult is still discussion on his opinion. As far as perception goes, you have accused me of spewing horse **** when you yourself can not and will not even attempt to back up your own statements, you have flip flopped on your statements, and now all you can do is scream "no I said" so the perception is clear. You are correct 2 is not tons of threads, guess you got me there. I did back them up, you "flip flopped them" and all you can do is say "flip flop" because you can't read. I never changed my statement, not once.
You did not and can not back up your statement. As I said before there is far more evidence disproving what you say than there is proving what you say. Obviously you are having trouble with basic logic so I can not say that I am surprised by your inability to comprehend whether something is broken or not.
|
deezy dabest
IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP
1584
|
Posted - 2014.12.25 10:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Stupid Blueberry wrote:My statement: Caldari hitbox is fine.
Your statement: No, hit detection is bad.
My statement: hitbox =/= hit detection
Your statement: flip flop, you can't back up your statement, you're dumb, let me make a thread about it.
Yet another "oh i said"
You have a good one man, my back hurts from stooping down to your level.
|
|
|
| |
|