|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cavani1EE7
Murphys-Law
605
   |
Posted - 2014.12.16 14:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:Roman837 wrote:Let me guess. We stomped you and your team? Hard honesty time. I'm sure you are good CEO and leader roman, I've talked to you before and maybe one day we will get to be on the same PC team you seemed like a pretty cool guy but your forum meta game just needs some serious work. you just make it so hard for people to like you when you say things like this.
Saying what you want to say regardless of people will dislike you or talk **** > Caring about reputation over a videogame forum period.
They say Assaults are balanced between each other. They are Minmatar and Amarr Assaults.
|
Cavani1EE7
Murphys-Law
605
|
Posted - 2014.12.16 14:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:Cavani1EE7 wrote:Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:Roman837 wrote:Let me guess. We stomped you and your team? Hard honesty time. I'm sure you are good CEO and leader roman, I've talked to you before and maybe one day we will get to be on the same PC team you seemed like a pretty cool guy but your forum meta game just needs some serious work. you just make it so hard for people to like you when you say things like this. Saying what you want to say regardless of people will dislike you or talk **** > Caring about reputation over a videogame forum period. isn't this the reason roman claimed for making murphy's Law those. Because ERA had a bad reputation?
No, that was a minor reason.
I'm not writing the whole story.
They say Assaults are balanced between each other. They are Minmatar and Amarr Assaults.
|
Cavani1EE7
Murphys-Law
605
|
Posted - 2014.12.16 16:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
CUSE WarLord wrote:Roman837 wrote:The "community" has been focusing it's "war" efforts on us for months. And yet we stand. Why? Because as much **** talk as people talk about us. They cannot deny...we bring fights and content.
Wave after wave. We're still here. We're not going anywhere. i remember when a lot of your members wanted to give up and hop ship and i told them to stay loyal to murphys.
Like, when?
They say Assaults are balanced between each other. They are Minmatar and Amarr Assaults.
|
Cavani1EE7
Murphys-Law
606
|
Posted - 2014.12.16 20:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Dust User wrote:Cavani1EE7 wrote:CUSE WarLord wrote:Roman837 wrote:The "community" has been focusing it's "war" efforts on us for months. And yet we stand. Why? Because as much **** talk as people talk about us. They cannot deny...we bring fights and content.
Wave after wave. We're still here. We're not going anywhere. i remember when a lot of your members wanted to give up and hop ship and i told them to stay loyal to murphys. Like, when? If you only knew how many of your guys tried to join KEQ.
Whoever these presumed guys are, they can go suck a **** and leave the corp. I have zero regards to crybabies who talk about leaving a corp for some matches lost.
They say Assaults are balanced between each other. They are Minmatar and Amarr Assaults.
|
Cavani1EE7
Murphys-Law
606
|
Posted - 2014.12.16 20:48:00 -
[5] - Quote
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:If there was a serious war and the community seriously wanted you off the map you would have 11 pc's to show for tonight. And tomorrow night and the night after that. That is a war, 3 skirmish pc a night is just having fun playing PC. You bring good fights that why you get attacked is because you bring good fights. People in PC want good fights not district grinding.
I don't want you off the map, many people I know don't want you off the map. Same goes with FA they are needed for the health of PC.
If you are ever down to your last couple of districts and someone is trying to take them. I'll even fight with you to keep your districts.
Meh, I agree with you on everything but the point "3 skirmish pc a night is just having fun playing PC". This point would be valid if people wouldn't actually be trying much hard to beat us and flip our districts.
They say Assaults are balanced between each other. They are Minmatar and Amarr Assaults.
|
Cavani1EE7
Murphys-Law
606
|
Posted - 2014.12.16 21:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Cavani1EE7 wrote:Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:If there was a serious war and the community seriously wanted you off the map you would have 11 pc's to show for tonight. And tomorrow night and the night after that. That is a war, 3 skirmish pc a night is just having fun playing PC. You bring good fights that why you get attacked is because you bring good fights. People in PC want good fights not district grinding.
I don't want you off the map, many people I know don't want you off the map. Same goes with FA they are needed for the health of PC.
If you are ever down to your last couple of districts and someone is trying to take them. I'll even fight with you to keep your districts. Meh, I agree with you on everything but the point "3 skirmish pc a night is just having fun playing PC". This point would be valid if people wouldn't actually be trying much hard to beat us and flip our districts. No, point still stands. Just because you fags want to play this like care bear with no threat of losing districts doesn't mean the rest of us enjoy PC being ******* disney land. You aren't being removed - and the fights are as friendly as PC should be. Until you get a serious threat of removal you should consider it us having fun with you.
Keep calm, I don't give a yuck about losing districts, it's a part of PC flipping and losing, (meaningless)districts come and go.
I was just pointing it out. For example to what I said, stacking timers cannot be called "having fun fights".
It's just a tactic to have an advantage over the one you are trying so hard to overwhelm.
"Balance" is a mythical word
|
Cavani1EE7
Murphys-Law
606
|
Posted - 2014.12.16 21:52:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ghost Kaisar wrote:CUSE WarLord wrote:Cavani1EE7 wrote:Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:If there was a serious war and the community seriously wanted you off the map you would have 11 pc's to show for tonight. And tomorrow night and the night after that. That is a war, 3 skirmish pc a night is just having fun playing PC. You bring good fights that why you get attacked is because you bring good fights. People in PC want good fights not district grinding.
I don't want you off the map, many people I know don't want you off the map. Same goes with FA they are needed for the health of PC.
If you are ever down to your last couple of districts and someone is trying to take them. I'll even fight with you to keep your districts. Meh, I agree with you on everything but the point "3 skirmish pc a night is just having fun playing PC". This point would be valid if people wouldn't actually be trying much hard to beat us and flip our districts. to me attacking someone and winning then not trying to take the district is very insulting. its like we just beat you but we will be nice and let you keep your district is a slap in the face. in my experience friendly PCs just end up pissing both sides off. Winning and not taking districts is the ultimate insult. You're literally turning one of their districts into farming land.
Yes but you are the one farming them 
"Balance" is a mythical word
|
Cavani1EE7
Murphys-Law
607
|
Posted - 2014.12.16 22:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
Dust User wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:Dust User wrote:Who's been attacking besides ToP? We haven't been attacking. Then what's all this fuss aboot stacking timers? 
That was an example smartass, but it has happened about a week ago vs lolCP
"Balance" is a mythical word
|
|
|
| |
|