DUST Search - 24v24 that was in the uprising patch notes if i remember rightly

All Channels

General Discussions

24v24 that was in the uprising patch notes if i remember rightly

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
TechMechMeds KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 6357	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:04:00 - [1] - Quote Is it going to be implemented and are we anywhere near it?. Is it really possible with the ps3s limitations?. I am GJRs Renfield.
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 5488	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:06:00 - [2] - Quote Yeah 24v24 was not in the patchnotes. At least, not in the 1.10 notes. My advice to you, playa...
TechMechMeds KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 6357	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:09:00 - [3] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Yeah 24v24 was not in the patchnotes. At least, not in the 1.10 notes. That has nothing to do with what i am asking but thanks. I am GJRs Renfield.
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 3917	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:12:00 - [4] - Quote Considering how they struggle with performance at 16v16 right now, my guess is that anything more will not happen on PS3. "That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
TechMechMeds KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 6359	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:13:00 - [5] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: Considering how they struggle with performance at 16v16 right now, my guess is that anything more will not happen on PS3. Dat 256mb vram though. I am GJRs Renfield.
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 3920	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:19:00 - [6] - Quote TechMechMeds wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Considering how they struggle with performance at 16v16 right now, my guess is that anything more will not happen on PS3. Dat 256mb vram though. facepalm I always look at that stat, and then look at "We want this console to last 10 years!" and wonder who the bigger dumbass was. Really though we should push to get something moving to PS4 and actually expand out the game modes. "That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
KING CHECKMATE Opus Arcana Covert Intervention 6252	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:20:00 - [7] - Quote TechMechMeds wrote: Is it going to be implemented and are we anywhere near it?. Is it really possible with the ps3s limitations?. If MAG could run 128 vs 128, a dozen years ago, CCP will eventually too... Amarr Logi, Scout, Assault , Sentinel and soon Commando. Check MY loyalty Empress o7
TechMechMeds KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 6360	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:21:00 - [8] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Considering how they struggle with performance at 16v16 right now, my guess is that anything more will not happen on PS3. Dat 256mb vram though. facepalm I always look at that stat, and then look at "We want this console to last 10 years!" and wonder who the bigger dumbass was. Really though we should push to get something moving to PS4 and actually expand out the game modes. Yeah defo. I am GJRs Renfield.
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 3920	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:22:00 - [9] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Is it going to be implemented and are we anywhere near it?. Is it really possible with the ps3s limitations?. If MAG could run 128 vs 128, a dozen years ago, CCP will eventually too... You also assume that CCP have produced the basecode efficiently as MAG did....and well....it's CCP soo... "That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Arkena Wyrnspire Fatal Absolution 20021	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:22:00 - [10] - Quote It was never in patch notes. It was falsely advertised on the store advert, though. The Federation is not a defined region of space, of planets, of mountains, rivers, or woods. It is a vision.
TechMechMeds KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 6360	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:23:00 - [11] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Is it going to be implemented and are we anywhere near it?. Is it really possible with the ps3s limitations?. If MAG could run 128 vs 128, a dozen years ago, CCP will eventually too... You're smarter than that. Mag didn't have the amoint of data transfer going on or even half the sht going on that dust does. It wasn't even connected to another game where data has to update constantly etc. Mag was cool because the ps3 cpu isn't that bad for how crap it is so it could handle it but the data transfer that occurs with dust is pretty huge, much more than mag. I am GJRs Renfield.
Heimdallr69 Nyain San General Tso's Alliance 3871	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:25:00 - [12] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Considering how they struggle with performance at 16v16 right now, my guess is that anything more will not happen on PS3. Dat 256mb vram though. facepalm I always look at that stat, and then look at "We want this console to last 10 years!" and wonder who the bigger dumbass was. Really though we should push to get something moving to PS4 and actually expand out the game modes. They like PC not ps4 Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
TechMechMeds KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 6360	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:25:00 - [13] - Quote Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: It was never in patch notes. It was falsely advertised on the store advert, though. Nah, i was in a playstation group of about 30 people and we all crapped our pants with excitement when we saw it in the patch notes and were waiting for the installation. We then got in game and were let down. If its not in the patch notes now then its been edited. Waiting to load up into a 24v24 match is not something you'd forget about being let down by trust me. I am GJRs Renfield.
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 3920	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:26:00 - [14] - Quote Heimdallr69 wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Considering how they struggle with performance at 16v16 right now, my guess is that anything more will not happen on PS3. Dat 256mb vram though. facepalm I always look at that stat, and then look at "We want this console to last 10 years!" and wonder who the bigger dumbass was. Really though we should push to get something moving to PS4 and actually expand out the game modes. They like PC not ps4 What? Because Legion? Rattati doesn't give a ** about Legion. "That little st Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
TechMechMeds KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 6360	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:29:00 - [15] - Quote I'm pretty sure that CCP Shanghai and Reykijavik operate seperately but in the same universe otherwise dusts initial fund raiser would have been a scam as CCP gets enough money from Eve. I am GJRs Renfield.
G Felix Titans of Phoenix 333	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:30:00 - [16] - Quote Increasing the players per match will increase latency and lag and increase wait times while queuing for a match even further. I would put this on the Legion wish list with MTAC's and trees. Dust can be frustrating. (Gò»°Gûí°)Gò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+)
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 3921	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:31:00 - [17] - Quote TechMechMeds wrote: I'm pretty sure that CCP Shanghai and Reykijavik operate seperately but in the same universe otherwise dusts initial fund raiser would have been a scam as CCP gets enough money from Eve. Let's put it this way. If the company comes to feel that a PS4 port would be profitable, it is far more likely to happen. It will appear profitable if people ask for it and actively play the game. "That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
TechMechMeds KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 6360	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:31:00 - [18] - Quote G Felix wrote: Increasing the players per match will increase latency and lag and increase wait times while queuing for a match even further. I would put this on the Legion wish list with MTAC's and trees. Well i wasn't even petitioning for it, i was asking if we are near it or if it's even possible. Your guess is as good as mine. I am GJRs Renfield.
TechMechMeds KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 6360	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:33:00 - [19] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: I'm pretty sure that CCP Shanghai and Reykijavik operate seperately but in the same universe otherwise dusts initial fund raiser would have been a scam as CCP gets enough money from Eve. Let's put it this way. If the company comes to feel that a PS4 port would be profitable, it is far more likely to happen. It will appear profitable if people ask for it and actively play the game. Supply and demand aye. So far CCP has been very good with that and especially Rattati despite how long it's taken. I am GJRs Renfield.
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 3921	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:38:00 - [20] - Quote TechMechMeds wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: I'm pretty sure that CCP Shanghai and Reykijavik operate seperately but in the same universe otherwise dusts initial fund raiser would have been a scam as CCP gets enough money from Eve. Let's put it this way. If the company comes to feel that a PS4 port would be profitable, it is far more likely to happen. It will appear profitable if people ask for it and actively play the game. Supply and demand aye. So far CCP has been very good with that and especially Rattati despite how long it's taken. BPOs come out. They sell well. We get 2 client updates and a roadmap for future updates. Correlation doesn't always equate to causation, but in this case I think it's pretty clear. "That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
TechMechMeds KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 6362	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:41:00 - [21] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: I'm pretty sure that CCP Shanghai and Reykijavik operate seperately but in the same universe otherwise dusts initial fund raiser would have been a scam as CCP gets enough money from Eve. Let's put it this way. If the company comes to feel that a PS4 port would be profitable, it is far more likely to happen. It will appear profitable if people ask for it and actively play the game. Supply and demand aye. So far CCP has been very good with that and especially Rattati despite how long it's taken. BPOs come out. They sell well. We get 2 client updates and a roadmap for future updates. Correlation doesn't always equate to causation, but in this case I think it's pretty clear. Yeah defo. I am GJRs Renfield.
KING CHECKMATE Opus Arcana Covert Intervention 6254	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:48:00 - [22] - Quote TechMechMeds wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Is it going to be implemented and are we anywhere near it?. Is it really possible with the ps3s limitations?. If MAG could run 128 vs 128, a dozen years ago, CCP will eventually too... You're smarter than that. Mag didn't have the amoint of data transfer going on or even half the sht going on that dust does. It wasn't even connected to another game where data has to update constantly etc. Mag was cool because the ps3 cpu isn't that bad for how crap it is so it could handle it but the data transfer that occurs with dust is pretty huge, much more than mag. I was talking regarding Dust514 24 vs 24. Im OBVIOUSLY not expecting DUST to be a 128 vs 128. Im not that dumb. n.n Amarr Logi, Scout, Assault , Sentinel and soon Commando. Check MY loyalty Empress o7
Heimdallr69 Nyain San General Tso's Alliance 3871	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:52:00 - [23] - Quote KING CHECKMATE wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Is it going to be implemented and are we anywhere near it?. Is it really possible with the ps3s limitations?. If MAG could run 128 vs 128, a dozen years ago, CCP will eventually too... You're smarter than that. Mag didn't have the amoint of data transfer going on or even half the sht going on that dust does. It wasn't even connected to another game where data has to update constantly etc. Mag was cool because the ps3 cpu isn't that bad for how crap it is so it could handle it but the data transfer that occurs with dust is pretty huge, much more than mag. I was talking regarding Dust514 24 vs 24. Im OBVIOUSLY not expecting DUST to be a 128 vs 128. Im not that dumb. n.n 64 vs 64 pc battles Removed inappropriate content - CCP Logibro
G Felix Titans of Phoenix 333	Posted - 2014.12.10 19:05:00 - [24] - Quote TechMechMeds wrote: G Felix wrote: Increasing the players per match will increase latency and lag and increase wait times while queuing for a match even further. I would put this on the Legion wish list with MTAC's and trees. Well i wasn't even petitioning for it, i was asking if we are near it or if it's even possible. Your guess is as good as mine. I gave you my opinion, which is that it is not presently feasible. If this were a petition, it would have had [Petition] in the thread's title. And yes, while my guess is just as good as yours, mine is also significantly more realistic. You've asked a question and then become defensive when others attempt to answer it. Dust can be frustrating. (Gò»°Gûí°)Gò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+)
TechMechMeds KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 6363	Posted - 2014.12.10 19:09:00 - [25] - Quote G Felix wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: G Felix wrote: Increasing the players per match will increase latency and lag and increase wait times while queuing for a match even further. I would put this on the Legion wish list with MTAC's and trees. Well i wasn't even petitioning for it, i was asking if we are near it or if it's even possible. Your guess is as good as mine. I gave you my opinion, which is that it is not presently feasible. If this were a petition, it would have had [Petition] in the thread's title. And yes, while my guess is just as good as yours, mine is also significantly more realistic. You've asked a question and then become defensive when others attempt to answer it. You said put it on the wishlist, i wasn't wishing for anything, i was asking if it can actually be implemented or if we are near it. The cakes in the fact that my op was a question. There's nothing defensive about pointing out obviousness lol. I am GJRs Renfield.
saxonmish T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K 813	Posted - 2014.12.10 19:10:00 - [26] - Quote TechMechMeds wrote: Is it going to be implemented and are we anywhere near it?. Is it really possible with the ps3s limitations?. Ps. Dust on the ps4 please. ps3 didnt stop 'MAG' from having 256v256 so why cant we have a measly 24 v 24 lol SAXON ON A MISH - My Youtube Channel :)
TechMechMeds KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 6363	Posted - 2014.12.10 19:12:00 - [27] - Quote saxonmish wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Is it going to be implemented and are we anywhere near it?. Is it really possible with the ps3s limitations?. Ps. Dust on the ps4 please. ps3 didnt stop 'MAG' from having 256v256 so why cant we have a measly 24 v 24 lol Data transfer. Mag was nothing compared to Dust in that respect. I am GJRs Renfield.
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 3926	Posted - 2014.12.10 19:19:00 - [28] - Quote saxonmish wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Is it going to be implemented and are we anywhere near it?. Is it really possible with the ps3s limitations?. Ps. Dust on the ps4 please. ps3 didnt stop 'MAG' from having 256v256 so why cant we have a measly 24 v 24 lol MAG was 128vs128 actually "That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
G Felix Titans of Phoenix 334	Posted - 2014.12.10 20:02:00 - [29] - Quote TechMechMeds wrote: G Felix wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: G Felix wrote: Increasing the players per match will increase latency and lag and increase wait times while queuing for a match even further. I would put this on the Legion wish list with MTAC's and trees. Well i wasn't even petitioning for it, i was asking if we are near it or if it's even possible. Your guess is as good as mine. I gave you my opinion, which is that it is not presently feasible. If this were a petition, it would have had [Petition] in the thread's title. And yes, while my guess is just as good as yours, mine is also significantly more realistic. You've asked a question and then become defensive when others attempt to answer it. You said put it on the wishlist, i wasn't wishing for anything, i was asking if it can actually be implemented or if we are near it. The cakes in the fact that my op was a question. There's nothing defensive about pointing out obviousness lol. Lovely use of semantics. Considering increasing the player count per match is not on the roadmap and no Dev has brought it up since basically the start of uprising, I think we can all assume this is not anywhere on CCP's radar for Dust in the near future. But hey, if I'm totally wrong and 24 v 24 pops up in the next patch or two, I'll be happy to see it and I'll pay 20 mil ISK in "Well don't I look like a dummy" money to your wallet. Fair bet? Dust can be frustrating. (Gò»°Gûí°)Gò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+)
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides Learning Alliance 5385	Posted - 2014.12.10 20:09:00 - [30] - Quote Well, maybe if there was a mode where only the less resource intensive maps were used. As in, no Research Facility or Production Facility sockets. Then maybe we could have 24 vs 24 in that mode. Hand/Eye coordination cannot be taught. For everything else there is the Learning Coalition.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.