|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Sir Dukey
Murphys-Law
General Tso's Alliance
1258
   |
Posted - 2014.12.09 04:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
Give the scout back it's scan range while cloaked since the new system is coming out. The current scout+ewar+cloak isn't working out. It nerfs the scouts that actually play ewar. When I play ewar I usually have really low HP and depend on my cloak to help increase survive ability but as soon as I turn it on, it throws all the bonuses precision mods and range amps I put on down the drain. Please give scouts back the ewar while cloaked.
Also, we are losing directional arrows so ewar won't be as powerful as you intended so you might as well just give it back. I was never presented a good reason for that nerf being added in. It truely hurts scout gameplay and role.
Chocolate Juice
|
Sir Dukey
Murphys-Law
General Tso's Alliance
1270
|
Posted - 2014.12.09 20:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:yes, with more scanning around, this may be a time to lessen the penalty. Scouts, feel free to propose stuff!
I was thinking of a tired system
STD cloak- range nerf 50% - precision nerf 20%
ADV cloak- range nerf 35%- precision nerf 15%
PRO cloak range nerf 25%- precision nerf 10%
Chocolate Juice
|
Sir Dukey
Murphys-Law
General Tso's Alliance
1278
|
Posted - 2014.12.10 00:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vitantur Nothus wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:yes, with more scanning around, this may be a time to lessen the penalty. Scouts, feel free to propose stuff! I speak only for myself in this, but I personally don't mind flying blind. I've grown rather fond of cloak blind; it keeps me on my toes. I'd propose we wait-and-see just how hard Scouts are hit by 1.10 before tossing a lifeline.
It's either have scan range or no delay. Give me one and I'll be happy. I prefer no delay.
Chocolate Juice
|
Sir Dukey
Murphys-Law
General Tso's Alliance
1279
|
Posted - 2014.12.10 01:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Vitantur Nothus wrote:Sir Dukey wrote:Vitantur Nothus wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:yes, with more scanning around, this may be a time to lessen the penalty. Scouts, feel free to propose stuff! I speak only for myself in this, but I personally don't mind flying blind. I've grown rather fond of cloak blind; it keeps me on my toes. I'd propose we wait-and-see just how hard Scouts are hit by 1.10 before tossing a lifeline. It's either have scan range or no delay. Give me one and I'll be happy. I prefer no delay. There are other options. You could try Assault, for example. Or run your Scout with damps and an Active Scanner.
Why would a scout ever need an active scanner? Well it shouldn't
Chocolate Juice
|
Sir Dukey
Murphys-Law
General Tso's Alliance
1283
|
Posted - 2014.12.10 20:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
Celus Ivara wrote:As a Cloaky Scout, I like having scan nerfs while cloaked. It causes the whole "interesting decisions" thing;
"Is now a good time to poke my head out of the water and see what's going on, or should I stay sneaky and move somewhere else first?" There's a lot of fun tactical reasoning that goes into reaching a good answer to that question. :)
I will say though, that the present nerfs are so stark as to effectively remove scans entirely. Easing up on them slightly may be warranted.
Also, the idea of the nerfs being less bad as you move up through the tiers would make the higher tiers more interesting. Right now, most use-cases for the Cloak are very easily met by the STD and ADV tiers.
You're suppose to be a scout, not a ninja. We'll even ninjas know where everything is.
Chocolate Juice
|
|
|
| |
|