| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
3512
   |
Posted - 2014.12.04 18:29:00 -
[31] - Quote
Apothecary Za'ki wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:This is the problem with sharing ideas. First, there is a separate thread about this, and until we state we are going to change things, we aim to announce them and debate them. If you read the thread, then you will see the reasons, and the debate. AS of now, there is no plan to implement movement penalties, as the discussion was just about strafe penalties. rattati do you even EVE... shield moduals increase sig radius.. there is no movement penalties. what you could do is just make them increase the size of the hitbox when used on scouts since scouts are the MAJOR PROBLEM here with strafeing (tangoing) heavy suits cannot do it cause they are too fat and slow and medium suits have a larger hitbox and are slower then scouts anyway.. so if you nerf shields you are just driving more players to armor tank and also away from scout and even medium suits.. so more players will choose to play sentinel or even commando god forbid. NO SHIELD NERFS! (atleast only nerfs that effective scouts)
That is actually a good idea. Increase the hitbox with shield stacking. That would make more sense. You should suggest it in their fedback thread.
Although this would be a shield-exclusive nerf and make shield tankers easier to kill...thus forcing people to play more armor. So..maybe not :(
> Check RND out here
|
Cody Sietz
Random Gunz
RISE of LEGION
4166
|
Posted - 2014.12.04 18:40:00 -
[32] - Quote
Forlorn Destrier wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:This is the problem with sharing ideas. First, there is a separate thread about this, and until we state we are going to change things, we aim to announce them and debate them. If you read the thread, then you will see the reasons, and the debate. AS of now, there is no plan to implement movement penalties, as the discussion was just about strafe penalties. I read your posts CCP Ratatatatatatatata. They are my holy grail. My bible. They are the little black book of things to think about in the middle of the night. They sing to my soul They are the light on the railroad tracks that I am drawn to like a moth. They are... splendid. Too much?
Yes.
Stop kissing RatTitties weiner!
"I do agree with you there though. shudders"
-Arkena Wyrnspire
|
Sole Fenychs
Sinq Laison Gendarmes
Gallente Federation
550
|
Posted - 2014.12.04 19:02:00 -
[33] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:
dust is not eve, dropsuits are not ships, zero-g space is not a planet surface
I have now joined the Rattati cult.
You know what's up, man.
Sometimes, when reading all of these "it must be made exactly like EVE!" posts I lose a little faith in humanity, as well as the future of this game.
But now I know that it's in sane hands.
|
DUST Fiend
Onslaught Inc
RISE of LEGION
15467
|
Posted - 2014.12.04 19:45:00 -
[34] - Quote
Seeing Za'ki get shut down by a blue warms my frigid heart
Flight Academy coming soon(tm) to my YouTube
WoD 514
|
Everything Dies
Santa is coming...FOR BLOOD
1096
|
Posted - 2014.12.04 20:50:00 -
[35] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:
That is actually a good idea. Increase the hitbox with shield stacking. That would make more sense. You should suggest it in their fedback thread.
Although this would be a shield-exclusive nerf and make shield tankers easier to kill...thus forcing people to play more armor. So..maybe not :(
On the other hand, armor tankers are already subject to a movement penalty if they're at all serious about adding HP; higher strafe-speed + a slightly larger hitbox seems to be a relatively fair alternative to slower movement + more HP.
Mike Patton is the greatest singer in music. Proof
|
Auris Lionesse
Kang Lo Directorate
Gallente Federation
1294
|
Posted - 2014.12.04 22:13:00 -
[36] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Apothecary Za'ki wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:This is the problem with sharing ideas. First, there is a separate thread about this, and until we state we are going to change things, we aim to announce them and debate them. If you read the thread, then you will see the reasons, and the debate. AS of now, there is no plan to implement movement penalties, as the discussion was just about strafe penalties. rattati do you even EVE... shield moduals increase sig radius.. there is no movement penalties. what you could do is just make them increase the size of the hitbox when used on scouts since scouts are the MAJOR PROBLEM here with strafeing (tangoing) heavy suits cannot do it cause they are too fat and slow and medium suits have a larger hitbox and are slower then scouts anyway.. so if you nerf shields you are just driving more players to armor tank and also away from scout and even medium suits.. so more players will choose to play sentinel or even commando god forbid. NO SHIELD NERFS! (atleast only nerfs that effective scouts) dust is not eve, dropsuits are not ships, zero-g space is not a planet surface
i completely disagree with every letter of that post. youre wrong.
dust even has eve in the title of the game.
its the same.
shield tanking should have no form of movement penalty at all.
be it sprint or strafe or movement or one legged bunny hopping and waltzing.
thats part of shield tanking.
yes they are ships. the assault suits are assault cruisers.
the logi suits are logi cruisers
sentinels are functionally the same as marauders etc etc.
zero g and planet surface is irrelevant. being in a vacuum affecting speed would mean that armor mods should have no accompanying penalty in eve online since its zero g.
literally everything with your post is just wrong as far as new eden goes.
clearly this game has no future as a serious mmo based shooter if were just going to throw out everything that made eve succesful.
it astonishes me how someone from ccp can say the two games that coexist in the same universe are not directly related and affect each others rules.
posts like this are why dust was so messed up when it launched.
deviation from the established and successful formula with years of balance.
Don't vote for iron wolf saber.
Vote for someone who will help the community i.e. anyone else.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |