| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dubya Guy
Abandoned Privilege
Top Men.
49
   |
Posted - 2014.12.01 14:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
I like the idea of matches with friendly fire on. It encourages skilled play. There should never be consequence-free team killing. Area effect weapons must be used with extreme caution.
But there should be a difference between being GÇ£punishedGÇ¥ by your peers for stupid, careless play, and being GÇ£bannedGÇ¥ for deliberate harassing, griefing, awoxing of teammates.
I propose a dual-mode GÇ£punishmentGÇ¥ system.
The first mode would give the option to GÇ£costGÇ¥ the careless blueberry a portion of their Loyalty Points. Perhaps as much as 50%. Friendly fire through reckless and indiscriminate use of your weapons should be strenuously discouraged in a way that still gives you an option to GÇ£learnGÇ¥ from your mistakes.
The second mode would give the option to kick and GÇ£banGÇ¥ someone after they had been punished via the first mode at least twice in a battle. They would be kicked from battle and not earn any LP or SP.
(Note: As a side effect of applying real consequences to even the first instance of friendly fire, I would predict TTK in factionals would increase markedly. Many tacticians would see this as a plus for the game.)
Enough Likes to this and I'll post to the suggested features section.
FPS = First Person Support. Kills win battles but it's kinda hard to kill if you're dead and out of ammo.
|
Dubya Guy
Abandoned Privilege
Top Men.
49
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 14:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Middas Betancore wrote:We can introduce new punishment systems
It doesn't stop ppl making alts to just switch through and grief ppl
A more "accelerated" banning as described would decrease the amount of "fun" per any given alt. But I agree it wouldn't stop such behavior.
Suggestions? Or do you not think this is much of a problem?
I was running in a cpl or your Kirjuun Heiian Caldari FW channel's squads yesterday, and quit it after being frustrated with this behavior.  That's why I posted.
FPS = First Person Support. Kills win battles but it's kinda hard to kill if you're dead and out of ammo.
|
Dubya Guy
Abandoned Privilege
Top Men.
50
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 15:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Different "Random" blueberries. Not in squads. No, they were not in Dust Brazil. I don't mean to whine. I just moved on to other things after losing suits to deliberate "un"friendly fire. Also, I am not the sort to have "enemies" in the game, so I am sure it was no vendetta.
They were chasing me down and plinking me, pausing between shots. Could I have killed them? I'm pretty sure I could. Instead, I approached and remained stationary. No response. So I began moving to the objective again. Plink, Plink, dead.
I don't retaliate because a) this might MAKE an enemy or encourage the griefing behavior and b) I would rather not get punished myself. I don't think the "risk" of getting killed is in any way a punishment to griefers who will get LP and WP when they finish the match, even if they kill a few blues.
FPS = First Person Support. Kills win battles but it's kinda hard to kill if you're dead and out of ammo.
|
| |
|