DUST Search - New heavy weapons?

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

New heavy weapons?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides Learning Alliance 5148	Posted - 2014.11.27 14:48:00 - [1] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: My idea is to create, using existing assets, a heavy plasma cannon (mortar), a heavy laser and a heavy HMG (autocannon) They would be more than capable at taking out vehicles, be proper "H" weapons even if they share a model with the light weapon and be differentiated by firing behaviour and effect. I believe this can be done with our tools. Now just to balance them. I am really looking forward to the Autocannon. Hand/Eye coordination cannot be taught. For everything else there is the Learning Coalition.
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides Learning Alliance 5148	Posted - 2014.11.27 14:56:00 - [2] - Quote Breakin Stuff wrote: DeathwindRising wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: My idea is to create, using existing assets, a heavy plasma cannon (mortar), a heavy laser and a heavy HMG (autocannon) They would be more than capable at taking out vehicles, be proper "H" weapons even if they share a model with the light weapon and be differentiated by firing behaviour and effect. I believe this can be done with our tools. Now just to balance them. will there be effort towards making anti-infantry heavy weapons as well for caldari, gallente, and amarr? I'm hsving a hard time envisioning that these weapons couldn't be efficiently used on infantry to one degree or another. I think he is making reference to the Autocannon which is an AV variant of the HMG. I suppose we could add a lower powered lower charge time Forge Gun, but I think it is best to focus on these weapons Rattati has suggested first, and save other ideas for after we have those ones balanced. Hand/Eye coordination cannot be taught. For everything else there is the Learning Coalition.
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides Learning Alliance 5186	Posted - 2014.11.28 17:52:00 - [3] - Quote Breakin Stuff wrote: DeathwindRising wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: My idea is to create, using existing assets, a heavy plasma cannon (mortar), a heavy laser and a heavy HMG (autocannon) They would be more than capable at taking out vehicles, be proper "H" weapons even if they share a model with the light weapon and be differentiated by firing behaviour and effect. I believe this can be done with our tools. Now just to balance them. will there be effort towards making anti-infantry heavy weapons as well for caldari, gallente, and amarr? I'm hsving a hard time envisioning that these weapons couldn't be efficiently used on infantry to one degree or another. I wonder what the effect would be of firing a Heavy Plasma Cannon (mortar) into a low ceiling in a confined space? Hand/Eye coordination cannot be taught. For everything else there is the Learning Coalition.
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides Learning Alliance 5188	Posted - 2014.11.28 18:19:00 - [4] - Quote postapo wastelander wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: My idea is to create, using existing assets, a heavy plasma cannon (mortar), a heavy laser and a heavy HMG (autocannon) They would be more than capable at taking out vehicles, be proper "H" weapons even if they share a model with the light weapon and be differentiated by firing behaviour and effect. I believe this can be done with our tools. Now just to balance them. Ratatti i found you matari AA (anti-armor) autocannon (not that idea of mine but new one) ;p Video 1 Video 2 In other words, hand held artillery. Hand/Eye coordination cannot be taught. For everything else there is the Learning Coalition.
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides Learning Alliance 5189	Posted - 2014.11.28 18:32:00 - [5] - Quote ToRgUe77 wrote: how exactly would a cal hmg be practical? charge up and high recoil? wouldn't that make it horrible at range while the charge up makes cqc sticky? Magsec HMG? Hand/Eye coordination cannot be taught. For everything else there is the Learning Coalition.
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides Learning Alliance 5190	Posted - 2014.11.28 18:56:00 - [6] - Quote Meeko Fent wrote: Megaman Trigger wrote: Actually I was going more with being geared toward mid to long ranged combat using Rail tech. And yes, I don't see how a Rail weapon works as a machingun. In that idea, We would end up with a huge RR (which isn't necessarily bad), Perhaps 4 shot burst, 75 DMG per shot, .5 sec charge per burst. Or, using the Forge Gun model but without the glow, automatic but only 5 rounds per second (0.20 sec charge time) with equivalent DPS to an Assault HMG, but the range of a Rail Rifle. No site or magnification on ADS, so better for mid range than sniping unless you are really good. An anti infantry Heavy Breach Rail weapon. Hand/Eye coordination cannot be taught. For everything else there is the Learning Coalition.

Copyright © 2013-2024, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,02s, ref 20241121/1258
EVE-Online™/DUST514™ and EVE/DUST514 imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.