|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tesfa Alem
Death by Disassociation
376
   |
Posted - 2014.11.13 18:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Reserved.
I'll answer these questions in good time.Not surprised to see you're not speaking to Judge about this. Good to see you lot have stopped lying about vehicles for once.
Redline for Thee, but no Redline for Me.
|
Tesfa Alem
Death by Disassociation
393
|
Posted - 2014.11.17 10:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
answers in italics
1. Vehicle Command Tree Structure
Retain the Same as Current (racial at top end only)
Why?
Its a waste of time. Fix whats broken,skill tree aesthetics means nothing.
2. Vehicle Upgrades Tree Structure
Should it (regardless of multipliers)(aware of new bonuses depending on the option)
b. Retain Current form
Why?
The same as number 1
3. Should there be reskinned place holders for FW vehicles (IE Golden Madrugers w/ amarr logo and Rusted Gunlogis /w repub logo) Even if this means that there is a very low chance of having unique models in the foreseeable future or unique stats even?
Yes we should. Its the starting block towards finnaly puting in the remaining vehicles in the game.
4. Should Militia Vehicles and Military Grade Vehicles feature similar slot layouts (as to not eat up slot real-estate) akin to standard dropsuit relationship with militia dropsuits?
No. Leave the sica and somas as is. They are weak enough to not be a real threat to a tanker, but remaina good introduction to new tanker, and a cheap alternative for when we've lost something a bit more exppensive.
5. Scout LAV's Role(s) should be?
Fast, low hp, low pg and cpuu, built in scanner.
6. Logistics LAV's where the start of the killer bee revolution, What tamer Role(s) should it have if brought back?
Low hp, built in repper for either tanks or infantry. decent pg and CPU. Logi lavs were only op because of 25% av resistance bonus + 60% hardener. They don't have that anymore, they can be brough back as is.
7. Enforcer HAVs previously did not have a strong role, What roles should it have?
8. Murader HAVs previously had a god like role, What roles should it retain if ever brought back in?
Just give them an extra slot and a bit ,more PG and CPU. Proto tank fits proto modules and voila, Progression along tiers.
9. Logistics DS underperformed massively last time, what roles should it have to make it useful?
It performed perfectly, return as is but with the manuevarabilty of an ADs and the tankingess of a std ship.
10. Assault Dropships are a subject of much Hyperbole, What attribute is the ADS hurting in the most right now?
These three:
Survivability
Offensive Capability
Skewed Windows of Engagement
11. There is thought about bringing turret variants back BUT so many of the old variants were 'useless' in the light of another so in what way or roles would you give these returning turrets to avoid similar fates.
Many posts have been made about this in features and ideas.
12. Currently we have a selection of active and passive modules. Would you like to see an introduction of Modules that were off behavior of current as additional Options. An example would be an active armor repair that outperforms the passives?
You mean mix the old sytem with this one? Lets fix whats wrong one thing at a time.
13. There are currently no known technical evaluation on the possibility of more support like game play such as Deploying Equipment (ie Proximity Explosive or Nanohive), Siege Modes (your vehicle sacrifices a large amount of one stat to gain a great strength in another; Like 0 mobility for heavy tank and offensive ability) or even a repair turret or Mobile Supply Depot. Despite this are you very interested in seeing these mechanics brought into playing field to be hotfixed around and design something with? Which ones? Any new ideas of your own you think that could be done?
Complete and utter waste of time.
14. Dropship Immortality was pretty serious issue because of the lack of counters mostly. Would the community support an AA turret variant that cannot lower its turret base underneath a certain point making it difficult to deal with other threats if the Dropships where returned to similar power before 1.8D?
Despite your troll bait, We already have AA turrets by the way, rail installations do 1700+ damage per shot, blaster instaltions can be very dangerous from very long ranges. Also which tanker would fit a gun that cannot shoot other tanks?
15. Several Quality of Life Features do not have any technical evaluations yet, are you willing to support such features such as: Dropship Drop Camera for passengers, Fixing the Small Turret Facing Bug, Allowing LAV passengers to shoot their weapons, Lock On Warning, Entry and Delay of Exit of a vehicle up to 3 seconds.
Sure we can go back to CCP Blams plans for vehicles, i wonder how much he left in code. For now, lets fix what ratatti broke first and see what comes of it. To me these are medium to low prioties.
17. Should our Vehicle play model focus on slower cycles (High HP; Low Speed; Low Repairability)
or
Remain as is? (TTK similar to that of infantry; Low HP; Higher Speeds, Higher Recovery)
Why?
Both of these ideas are pretty demonstrative of vehicle ignorace. TTK should not be the same as infatnry, these are not milita dropsuits. In terms of hp vs speed vs recovery this should be left up to the discretion of the pilot or tanker. This is something we already have in place.
Finally your links!
Gimmie!
Go to judge rhadamanthu'ss youtube page.
Redline for Thee, but no Redline for Me.
|
Tesfa Alem
Death by Disassociation
393
|
Posted - 2014.11.17 11:02:00 -
[3] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:DarthPlagueis TheWise wrote:i dont give a **** because im infantry lolololol Hello infantry; let me hear your screams as I run over you head and crush it like a tomato can.
Some freindly advice here, you're not one of us, Trying to be is a bit embarassing and dare i say it cringe worthy.
"How could i know? that maybe you have alts or something"
Because all of your posts prior to this thread and especially including it make it painfully obvious. Its akin to saying "I love footbal, i've usually manage to hit a home run at the 18th hole. Man, Arsenal are having a great time at the Superbowl or what?"
Just at least be as straitforward as rattati is, who vociferously admits he doesn't know the slightest thing about vehicles and is not planning to learn, to the point of taking offense at being offered a ride in a dropship. Stop the B.S and try to build some trust.
Redline for Thee, but no Redline for Me.
|
Tesfa Alem
Death by Disassociation
393
|
Posted - 2014.11.17 14:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:
I had written something long but felt it would have been wasted effort and on deaf ears.
I am just a simple player
I just want to have fun playing.
Also the analogy you're looking for is Fantasy Football vs real football.
Playing Baseball in a hockey rink is one of my specialities.
No my analogy was apt. Maybe yours was a little bit better, as in having no clue what you are saying/doing yet pretending you are doing it right.
Save me the bull on the 'sadly i am currently unopposed.' I do consider the Judge to be a good friend, and I know exactly what your reaction was to his current situation. Spare me.
Keep it simple. Don't throw in B.S assumtions like ADS godmode/logi ds useless in your questionaire. Don't assume things you never touched in dust to be useless. Collect data. Dont troll in other threads.
None of the things here will be tested before release. So of couse i'm going to treat one of the only 2 cpms to rant, troll and BS about vehicles taking in ''balance advice'' with a massive grain of salt.
Redline for Thee, but no Redline for Me.
|
Tesfa Alem
Death by Disassociation
396
|
Posted - 2014.11.17 20:00:00 -
[5] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:
I would consider it a miracle if you can get Judge to slap my hand.
Here you go again back to troll mode. Taunting about Judge in his IRL situation, thats actually a really sad statement of your true character. If you are going to troll about people's real lives, why should i take what you say about digtial vehicles seriously.
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:
Also as Omni I have touched about everything before and do currently have access to all prototype gear should I want to part with my wallet more.
Really?
I have acess to all of that stuff, along with every other vet, without paying cash money for it. But what else to expect from the only person on the forums that considers unlocking forge guns to be a major acomplishment.
Redline for Thee, but no Redline for Me.
|
|
|
| |
|