Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
4727
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 16:36:00 -
[1] - Quote
If Sentinels couldn't hack?
EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
|
I-Shayz-I
I----------I
4997
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 16:40:00 -
[2] - Quote
Then you'd better give us some points for being a bullet sponge cause **** man...sentinels can only get kills and kill assists aside from hacking. Maybe even just bonus points for being next to an objective and killing anything near it.
Kill +50 Defender +25 Hardened +6
You can get 30 kills and still get 8th place on the board if your team is competent, meaning lowered isk rewards. Sentinels have it tough as it is currently unless they are squad leaders
Or make a variant that subs out a sidearm for an equipment slot
CCP IF YOU'RE READING THIS MAKE MY DREAM COME TRUE AND LET ME USE A REPAIR TOOL WITH A HMG PLEASE
7162 wp with a Repair Tool!
List of Legion Feedback Threads!
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
4728
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 16:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
I-Shayz-I wrote:Then you'd better give us some points for being a bullet sponge cause **** man...sentinels can only get kills and kill assists aside from hacking. Maybe even just bonus points for being next to an objective and killing anything near it.
Kill +50 Defender +25 Hardened +6
You can get 30 kills and still get 8th place on the board if your team is competent, meaning lowered isk rewards. Sentinels have it tough as it is currently unless they are squad leaders
Or make a variant that subs out a sidearm for an equipment slot
CCP IF YOU'RE READING THIS MAKE MY DREAM COME TRUE AND LET ME USE A REPAIR TOOL WITH A HMG PLEASE AV says your post is incorrect.
I can get quite a bit higher than 8th place with AV
EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
3449
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 17:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
I think in general suits are a little *too* multipurpose. If only certain suits can perform critical actions, you basically force a more diverse selection of suit types on the battlefield, which I think is good. Specifics are of course up for discussion, but I think overall its a valid thought process to pursue.
Hotfix Delta Sentinel eHP Calcs
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
4730
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 17:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
Me and kane were talking about this a bit ago.
it would INSTANTLY change heavy meta.
But how do you change the meta so everyone doesn't just go "No worries, I'll just roll scout, LOL?"
EVE Online is what you get when engineers attempt to create "fun" without consulting someone who comprehends the word.
|
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
3400
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 19:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sure... I'd be interested...
http://evil-guide.tripod.com/
|
Vyzion Eyri
The Southern Legion Final Resolution.
2519
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 20:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
Or maybe change their hacking rate so that it's implausible for them to consider hacking, but they can still assist a hack.
It may be a nice change. Firstly heavies won't instantly lose their suits to remotes as often because they won't be on top of points as much, and secondly they will rather spend time defending the people hacking than trying to squeeze in on some juicy hack WPs, and killing people might net them more WP than maybe getting a hack assist whilst letting the enemy swarm into the point and shoot the hackers.
Or it could fall on its head depending on how much hacking heavies do already, and render the suit redundant as pointed out previously.
> Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
|
Kain Spero
Goonfeet
3764
|
Posted - 2014.11.10 11:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
I think making heavies not able to hack objectives would be a really good change. I think back to PC and when one team would try to vehicle spam like crazy, good vehicles as well, but still have the battle end in a loss for them because vehicles can't hack points.
If you have a bunch of heavies with no other infantry support defending an objective you can actually turn the tide with a speed hack. A large penalty to the heavy hacking rate could also work (and would be hot fixable).
Owner of Spero Escrow Services
Follow @KainSpero for Dust and Legion news
|
Dubya Guy
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
14
|
Posted - 2014.11.10 17:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
I share this sentiment:
Pokey Dravon wrote:I think in general suits are a little *too* multipurpose. If only certain suits can perform critical actions, you basically force a more diverse selection of suit types on the battlefield, which I think is good. Specifics are of course up for discussion, but I think overall its a valid thought process to pursue.
Particularly combined with some cost to switching suits at a supply depot ala this thread:
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2445459#post2445459
Battles would be decided a little less by the count of how many polymath heroes were on each side, and a little more on communication, planning, and coordination. The mid-level player with only one specialty could make more of a difference in any particular battle. Pub match squads would care a little more about skill-mix of members rather than just a grab-bag of whoever is online in their favorite chat channel at the time. Suits should reflect and limit roles with it remaining possible, but costly (time, vulnerability, whatever) to switch suits in a battle.
FPS = First Person Support. Kills win battles but it's kinda hard to kill if you're dead and out of ammo.
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
14378
|
Posted - 2014.11.10 19:01:00 -
[10] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:If Sentinels couldn't hack?
Nothing much they should be covering hackers anyway.
"HeGÇÖs sorry. ThatGÇÖs his sorry faceGǪ. Just keep quiet for now and maybe you'll get through this."
-Kador Ouryon
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |