|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ace Boone
359
   |
Posted - 2014.11.07 02:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
For some of these younger corps to really prosper and start showing some real slaying talent to make a change in PC?
How long until PC is mainly unfamiliar faces filled with new talent, or will it remain a circle jerk of overpowered alliances, and veteran super-corps that feel a need to hold high percentages of MH for no reason.
I'm tired of facing the same guys over and over again, and some corps just need to be taken down.
This is my third war room post this week, but i love this sub-forum and goddamnit it's boring as ****.
Only loyal to the republic.
|
Ace Boone
364
|
Posted - 2014.11.07 17:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
Izlare Lenix wrote:Ace Boone wrote:For some of these younger corps to really prosper and start showing some real slaying talent to make a change in PC?
How long until PC is mainly unfamiliar faces filled with new talent, or will it remain a circle jerk of overpowered alliances, and veteran super-corps that feel a need to hold high percentages of MH for no reason.
I'm tired of facing the same guys over and over again, and some corps just need to be taken down.
This is my third war room post this week, but i love this sub-forum and goddamnit it's boring as ****. I find it funny you raise all these valid points yet you are in an alliance most responsible for pushing smaller corps out of pc and then using timers most people can't attack to defend the territory.
We never take anyone's last district and gladly spare districts to anyone that wants one. Even if we're at war, we'll leave you with a district. As for my corp, don't be upset that we just whoop your ass when you attack us.
Only loyal to the republic.
|
Ace Boone
364
|
Posted - 2014.11.07 17:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
TRULY ELITE wrote:Ace Boone wrote:Izlare Lenix wrote:Ace Boone wrote:For some of these younger corps to really prosper and start showing some real slaying talent to make a change in PC?
How long until PC is mainly unfamiliar faces filled with new talent, or will it remain a circle jerk of overpowered alliances, and veteran super-corps that feel a need to hold high percentages of MH for no reason.
I'm tired of facing the same guys over and over again, and some corps just need to be taken down.
This is my third war room post this week, but i love this sub-forum and goddamnit it's boring as ****. I find it funny you raise all these valid points yet you are in an alliance most responsible for pushing smaller corps out of pc and then using timers most people can't attack to defend the territory. We never take anyone's last district and gladly spare districts to anyone that wants one. Even if we're at war, we'll leave you with a district. As for my corp, don't be upset that we just whoop your ass when you attack us. Erm.. That's probably because you haven't gotten down to anyones last district anyway since most corps have 5+
Because most of the time we don't even flip. And if wr wanted to, we easily could.
Only loyal to the republic.
|
Ace Boone
365
|
Posted - 2014.11.09 14:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Fact is....a lot of career pubbers are not interested in "competitive dusting". For some reason, pubs satisfy their bloodthirst.
Pubs are boring, and we need to bring incentive back to PC.
They said they'd announce PC changes this week, did they not? I can't ******* wait.
Make districts valuable, give a reason to take districts and be competitive.
Only loyal to the republic.
|
Ace Boone
370
|
Posted - 2014.11.11 00:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
Why is Onslaught not in PC? They have a bunch of vets and a fair amount of good players/forum warriors..Why not PC? Same for Subdreddit.
Only loyal to the republic.
|
Ace Boone
370
|
Posted - 2014.11.11 00:38:00 -
[6] - Quote
John ShepardIII wrote:Ace Boone wrote:Why is Onslaught not in PC? They have a bunch of vets and a fair amount of good players/forum warriors..Why not PC? Same for Subdreddit. Subdreddit died a long time ago
stop posting on the goddamn forums if you're not gonna play the game, John.
Only loyal to the republic.
|
|
|
| |
|