|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Vesta Opalus
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
151
|
Posted - 2014.11.05 22:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
Doshneil Antaro wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:I hear you, but how do you propose we improve the situation.
ONe way would be to shorten the blip timer massively, just so you see them instantly, and no more Sorry but you made uour bed Rattati. You nerfed the needle, we picked the scanner . If you nerf the scanner , we will run hives and remotes. This cycle will continue till all equipment is useless. The scans are currently fine, it just other equipment was made less desirable, thus creating a mass influx of the scanners equiped. Look back to the forum "Needle Changes Will Hurt the Game" and look at my posts. I gave reasons why the scanner would be so widely used and the needle wouldn't prior to 1.9
But the needle is fine... why is every change the end of all life as we know it for you? Are you a republican or something? |
Vesta Opalus
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
152
|
Posted - 2014.11.06 16:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Doshneil Antaro wrote:Vesta Opalus wrote:Doshneil Antaro wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:I hear you, but how do you propose we improve the situation.
ONe way would be to shorten the blip timer massively, just so you see them instantly, and no more Sorry but you made uour bed Rattati. You nerfed the needle, we picked the scanner . If you nerf the scanner , we will run hives and remotes. This cycle will continue till all equipment is useless. The scans are currently fine, it just other equipment was made less desirable, thus creating a mass influx of the scanners equiped. Look back to the forum "Needle Changes Will Hurt the Game" and look at my posts. I gave reasons why the scanner would be so widely used and the needle wouldn't prior to 1.9 But the needle is fine... why is every change the end of all life as we know it for you? Are you a republican or something? its not I've just traded the hardly used needle for the scanner. btw: DEMS got BTFO!!!!!! Your libtard tears are just that much tastier.
"libtards" - Republican confirmed.
Scanner is actually in a worse place than needles imo, there is a whole class of suits that are immune to it |
Vesta Opalus
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
153
|
Posted - 2014.11.06 17:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Clone D wrote:I prefer the realism of sharing scan data with the team, even sharing passive scan data with the whole team. Why wouldn't a military force do that? Combatants should use whatever advantage that they can get over the enemy.
Scouts can damp below active scan precision anyway, so it's not a problem.
I dunno, it feels wrong that everyone is subject to permascan but scouts. I wish there was a better scanning mechanic overall where everyone was subject to scans and dampening just determined at what range you are scannable. |
Vesta Opalus
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
155
|
Posted - 2014.11.06 18:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Clone D wrote:Vesta Opalus wrote:Clone D wrote:I prefer the realism of sharing scan data with the team, even sharing passive scan data with the whole team. Why wouldn't a military force do that? Combatants should use whatever advantage that they can get over the enemy.
Scouts can damp below active scan precision anyway, so it's not a problem. I dunno, it feels wrong that everyone is subject to permascan but scouts. I wish there was a better scanning mechanic overall where everyone was subject to scans and dampening just determined at what range you are scannable. Are you suggesting that in order to make it fair to everyone, there should be some level of active scanner capable of detecting all scouts, even the most dampened ones?
Yes, active and passive scans. However the most dampened scouts would only be scannable at very short ranges. |
Vesta Opalus
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
158
|
Posted - 2014.11.06 19:39:00 -
[5] - Quote
Clone D wrote:Vesta Opalus wrote:Clone D wrote:Are you suggesting that in order to make it fair to everyone, there should be some level of active scanner capable of detecting all scouts, even the most dampened ones? Yes, active and passive scans. However the most dampened scouts would only be scannable at very short ranges. One consideration for active scanners: if these "very short ranges" are too short (i.e. less than 20 meters), then the merc doing the scanning will not have time to swap from his/her scanner to a weapon, since weapon changes cannot occur until the scan completes, rendering the merc running the active scan incapable of self defense.
I agree, active scanners should maintain a range advantage over passive scans due to the ephemeral nature of the scans.
Also I think active scanners should have their base precision nerfed and then have precision modules increase their precision, that way one piece of equipment cant counter any number of dampeners on its own. |
|
|
|