Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Denchlad 7
Dead Man's Game
982
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
The recoil is impressive.
0-10 Shots - lolRecoil. 11-20 Shots - Holding a Dog on leash as it tries to chase a Cat (Merc). 21-30 Shots - Strapping yourself to a Bull in a Bull Ring after it sees red. 31+ Shots - Holding onto the underside of a Nuclear Missile at launch.
I nearly died laughing the first time I used it. Still excellent ADS. Love the ARR now.
The Connoisseur of Weapons. 19/19 L5 P2.
Snarcasm > Sarcasm
Excessively British.
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1887
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
While I think your descriptions are a bit over-the-top (and intentionally so), I've always preferred the ARR, and I suspect I will no longer be practically the only one using it. |
Maken Tosch
Dust University Ivy League
9975
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sounds balanced to me. ;)
On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
|
Derpty Derp
Dead Man's Game RUST415
597
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
Now we just need the same thing on the breach assault rifle... |
GLOBAL fils'de RAGE
Consolidated Dust
25
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Denchlad 7 wrote:The recoil is impressive.
0-10 Shots - lolRecoil. 11-20 Shots - Holding a Dog on leash as it tries to chase a Cat (Merc). 21-30 Shots - Strapping yourself to a Bull in a Bull Ring after it sees red. 31+ Shots - Holding onto the underside of a Nuclear Missile at launch.
I nearly died laughing the first time I used it. Still excellent ADS. Love the ARR now.
I tried my RR after a hiatus from Dust of a month or so and scope view was heavy, slow and painful. I tried my CR and it was pretty quick.
RR needs a scope tune up-after all it's not a missile tank with low prof. looking down range.
|
Denchlad 7
Dead Man's Game
985
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
Leadfoot10 wrote:While I think your descriptions are a bit over-the-top (and intentionally so), I've always preferred the ARR, and I suspect I will no longer be practically the only one using it.
The operative question, for me at least, is how the ARR stacks up to the BrAR (or if I should finally give in and get the CR)...as the RR was already relegated to a very specific role (long range slaying) and was practically useless at higher levels of play already (i.e. PC) well before this latest round of nerfs.
I think Ratatti overnerfed the RR by focusing on the wrong statistic, but what do I know. Its actually not, thats how it feels to me. The sheer jump in severity is immense. I also used the ARR regularly, and am already seeing more use it.
I too think it was overnerfed. Not Flaylock overnerfed, but less desireable than it used to be.
The Connoisseur of Weapons. 19/19 L5 P2.
Snarcasm > Sarcasm
Excessively British.
|
Doshneil Antaro
Dem Durrty Boyz General Tso's Alliance
286
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
I still have 0 issues with the RR post nerf. Than again I don't ever shoot more than 10 rounds. Still slaying fairly well hipfire cqc.
Sage /thread
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1890
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:59:00 -
[8] - Quote
Doshneil Antaro wrote:I still have 0 issues with the RR post nerf. Than again I don't ever shoot more than 10 rounds. Still slaying fairly well hipfire cqc.
I think that may be the key. |
Operative 1125 Lokaas
True Companion Planetary Requisitions
558
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 20:46:00 -
[9] - Quote
Leadfoot10 wrote:While I think your descriptions are a bit over-the-top (and intentionally so), I've always preferred the ARR, and I suspect I will no longer be practically the only one using it.
The operative question, for me at least, is how the ARR stacks up to the BrAR (or if I should finally give in and get the CR)...as the RR was already relegated to a very specific role (long range slaying) and was practically useless at higher levels of play already (i.e. PC) well before this latest round of nerfs.
I think Ratatti overnerfed the RR by focusing on the wrong statistic, but what do I know.
The operative question? Yes, I will agree to that question.
THIS IS THE VOICE OF RÁN
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |