Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
postapo wastelander
Wasteland Desert Rangers
455
|
Posted - 2014.10.28 21:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Oki i just try it and hell boyo I WAS BEAST, that thingie is fine. If someone see it otherwise, i think he have some issues not the weapon. Basicaly and with all honest its how it should be right now. Reminds me little the Ariet in MAG, but hell its topnotched now. Honestly whole that cry was basicaly i dont know if trollin' or if they want it like somekind of crutch for more advantage. But CCP and Rattatis team made it finay how it should be. Beats on long and medium range and still usefull for cqc, but dont expect that beastie times like before. Just go check by yourself boyos and gals, crying here how overnerfed RR was is pure nonsence
"Nanohives, repairs or droplinks, just ask me on field i can tink anything"
|
MINA Longstrike
Kirjuun Heiian
1469
|
Posted - 2014.10.28 22:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
Anecdotal evidence and Ad hominem attacks, along with one of the least comprehensible posting style's I've ever seen from someone who I presume pumped his posts through google translate to get 'english'. Bravo OP, Bravo.
You believe the weapon is fine, I believe it isn't. Most of the people I've encountered who actually do use the RR with any frequency are of the opinion that the nerf was overdone. Anecdotal evidence doesn't make for a very well supported argument
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
Llast 326
An Arkhos
5059
|
Posted - 2014.10.28 22:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
It be oki boyo me and me matee's savvy the posty
KRRROOOOOOM
|
postapo wastelander
Wasteland Desert Rangers
461
|
Posted - 2014.10.28 22:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:Anecdotal evidence and Ad hominem attacks, along with one of the least comprehensible posting style's I've ever seen from someone who I presume pumped his posts through google translate to get 'english'. Bravo OP, Bravo.
You believe the weapon is fine, I believe it isn't. Most of the people I've encountered who actually do use the RR with any frequency are of the opinion that the nerf was overdone. Anecdotal evidence doesn't make for a very well supported argument
I knew you will use gramanaz1 stuff later. Nope.
I tried it and RR is fine, i even not have 1 point in that skilled in and i was still possitive. I was still on first 5. I used militia one. And i even killed few times PROTO with GLU. Whats mean just one thingie for me, Rail Rifle is fine and end of story.
"Nanohives, repairs or droplinks, just ask me on field i can tink anything"
|
Jaran Vilktar
CORP SIX KING
42
|
Posted - 2014.10.28 22:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
postapo wastelander wrote: I don't use Rail Rifle's (AR 4 EVER!) with enough frequency to know if they're overnerfed or not but I tried the Assault Rail Rifle (Not the regular Rail Rifle yet, but I will) today and I though it was a very nice weapon. I'd like to say it was a necessary nerf but (as I already said) I don't use it as frequently as I should in order to give good feedback on it. P.S. All of those Captain Jack Sparrow gifs... you must really like Pirates of the Carribean.
DUST 514 Is the first FPS I played actively for the PS3 and is my favorite FPS to this very day. :)
|
MINA Longstrike
Kirjuun Heiian
1469
|
Posted - 2014.10.28 22:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
So the crux of my argument is that the weapon was over-nerfed in regards to how its hipfire causes it to perform at CQC.... and you think it's fine because you played one match and got a couple of kills, with no quantative or accurate way of communicating how many of them were done in 'close quarters' (lets set an arbitrary definition of sub 30m here).
I'm just going to make the assumption that you stood at 65m and used ADS the whole time.
Nothing to see here but someone trying to be cool by riding on the coattails of johnny depp.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. Kirjuun Heiian.
I have a few alts.
|
postapo wastelander
Wasteland Desert Rangers
464
|
Posted - 2014.10.28 22:46:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jaran Vilktar wrote:postapo wastelander wrote: I don't use Rail Rifle's (AR 4 EVER!) with enough frequency to know if they're overnerfed or not but I tried the Assault Rail Rifle (Not the regular Rail Rifle yet, but I will) today and I though it was a very nice weapon. I'd like to say it was a necessary nerf but (as I already said) I don't use it as frequently as I should in order to give good feedback on it. P.S. All of those Captain Jack Sparrow gifs... you must really like Pirates of the Carribean.
Yup hell matee boyo i even loved ol' animated one I tried the militia version and hell that thigie is beast i basicaly dont know who someone have a problem with it. I actually even recheck the lore after some threads here and basicaly i dont know what is with that people, but using precission rifle or long range one if you want like CQC, that pure nonsence. I understand their toy was nerfed but hell, its caldari weapon..caldari have even ships what using same strategy (long ranged combat). Its like want make long range weapon from shotgun. Meh i tried it and you read my statement, if someone have problem with it, i think he should try another weapon better for ambushing enemy. For exaple Gallentean weaponry like ARs, PCs or especialy for CQC shotgun. Using something for ranged combat for CQC is oki it is stupid honestly
"Nanohives, repairs or droplinks, just ask me on field i can tink anything"
|
Sequal Rise
Les Desanusseurs
134
|
Posted - 2014.10.28 22:52:00 -
[8] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:So the crux of my argument is that the weapon was over-nerfed in regards to how its hipfire causes it to perform at CQC.... and you think it's fine because you played one match and got a couple of kills, with no quantative or accurate way of communicating how many of them were done in 'close quarters' (lets set an arbitrary definition of sub 30m here).
I'm just going to make the assumption that you stood at 65m and used ADS the whole time.
Nothing to see here but someone trying to be cool by riding on the coattails of johnny depp. Do I need to remind you that RR is NOT a CQC weapon? Why telling his amount of CQC kills then? I agree that the hipfire kick is quite strong now, but it only puts the weapon where it should be : a long range weapon.
AR and CR users can't easily (if not at all) kill someone over a 65m range, why could you easily kill someone in CQC?
Sorry for my bad english.
|
postapo wastelander
Wasteland Desert Rangers
465
|
Posted - 2014.10.28 22:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sequal Rise wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:So the crux of my argument is that the weapon was over-nerfed in regards to how its hipfire causes it to perform at CQC.... and you think it's fine because you played one match and got a couple of kills, with no quantative or accurate way of communicating how many of them were done in 'close quarters' (lets set an arbitrary definition of sub 30m here).
I'm just going to make the assumption that you stood at 65m and used ADS the whole time.
Nothing to see here but someone trying to be cool by riding on the coattails of johnny depp. Do I need to remind you that RR is NOT a CQC weapon? Why telling his amount of CQC kills then? I agree that the hipfire kick is quite strong now, but it only puts the weapon where it should be : a long range weapon. AR and CR users can't easily (if not at all) kill someone over a 65m range, why could you easily kill someone in CQC?
I even sent here a cut from caldari LORE and basically she dont wont that. Its like talking to the tree
"Nanohives, repairs or droplinks, just ask me on field i can tink anything"
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |