| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
hfderrtgvcd
986
   |
Posted - 2014.10.25 16:24:00 -
[1] - Quote
Give all equipment a base hack time of 5 seconds. This would make reduce equipment spam and encourage more people to use codebreakers. Thoughts?
You can't fight in here! This is the war room.
|
Dust User
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
893
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 16:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
This should have been done a long time ago. |
Derpty Derp
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
578
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 18:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
Or failing that increase the wp to 25-50 for destroying it... Think about the consequence of filling a small room with equipment... one flux gets the enemy team well on their way to a fresh Barrage!
edit-but being able to quickly hack a remote explosive would be useful for those that don't like blowing up their silly bloobs... |
MEDICO RITARDATO
Dead Man's Game
RUST415
308
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 19:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Derpty Derp wrote:Or failing that increase the wp to 25-50 for destroying it... Think about the consequence of filling a small room with equipment... one flux gets the enemy team well on their way to a fresh Barrage!
CCP why do you hate shield?
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
5012
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 19:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
This may only encourage equipment spam on towers though.
I would rather my equipment be destroyed, unless they have a screen message on there so I can leave an RE around 
You can always tell a Millford Minja
|
Cross Atu
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
3496
|
Posted - 2014.10.25 22:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
Hacking has been proposed prior, I'm actually in favor of it however it needs some limitation on scale such as "can hack opposed equipment of an equal or lessor meta level than the codebreaker equipped"
With this requirement it gives more motive to run complex codebreakers and to have hacking leveled to 5, at which point the basic hack time could be slightly longer than 5 seconds because the actual hack time would still be short.
We could even scale the hack time based on meta level, or have 'hardened' types which take longer to hack, or both.
See a cool idea thread? Mail me the title and I'll take a look =)
|
Sgt Kirk
Fatal Absolution
8118
|
Posted - 2014.10.26 00:24:00 -
[7] - Quote
Cross Atu wrote:Hacking has been proposed prior, I'm actually in favor of it however it needs some limitation on scale such as "can hack opposed equipment of an equal or lessor meta level than the codebreaker equipped"
With this requirement it gives more motive to run complex codebreakers and to have hacking leveled to 5, at which point the basic hack time could be slightly longer than 5 seconds because the actual hack time would still be short.
We could even scale the hack time based on meta level, or have 'hardened' types which take longer to hack, or both.
and this is why you are the best CPM in my book.
CCP holds the Caldari's hand so this doesn't happen again.
|
Lloyd Orfay
Commando Perkone
Caldari State
99
|
Posted - 2014.10.26 00:24:00 -
[8] - Quote
No.
People would attempt this and it would not stop equipment spam, rather than have people try to hack drop uplinks and be killed from anyone spawned from there.
No one will waste five seconds to hack spammed equipment rather than waste less seconds destroying them all in the first place, either.
Proto players are the epitome of "havng your cake after you ate it" which is why most will never develop real skill
|
Dust User
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
895
|
Posted - 2014.10.26 00:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
Lloyd Orfay wrote:No.
People would attempt this and it would not stop equipment spam, rather than have people try to hack drop uplinks and be killed from anyone spawned from there.
No one will waste five seconds to hack spammed equipment rather than waste less seconds destroying them all in the first place, either.
Speak for yourself. I would love to run around in the pocket on the Cargo Hub hacking uplinks in my MinScout suit. |
Auris Lionesse
Kang Lo Directorate
Gallente Federation
1037
|
Posted - 2014.10.26 01:12:00 -
[10] - Quote
id rather be able to pick my equipment back up and take it with me so i can get more ammo later.
Don't vote for iron wolf saber.
Vote for someone who will help the community i.e. anyone else.
|
|
|
Cross Atu
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
3505
|
Posted - 2014.10.26 07:02:00 -
[11] - Quote
Sgt Kirk wrote:Cross Atu wrote:Hacking has been proposed prior, I'm actually in favor of it however it needs some limitation on scale such as "can hack opposed equipment of an equal or lessor meta level than the codebreaker equipped"
With this requirement it gives more motive to run complex codebreakers and to have hacking leveled to 5, at which point the basic hack time could be slightly longer than 5 seconds because the actual hack time would still be short.
We could even scale the hack time based on meta level, or have 'hardened' types which take longer to hack, or both. and this is why you are the best CPM in my book.
o7
Auris Lionesse wrote:id rather be able to pick my equipment back up and take it with me so i can get more ammo later.
A similar effect is achieved with the proposal to make deployed equipment granular. While it does not literally allow you to require deployed gear (and thus requires much less overhead in dev time) it breaks down each deployed portion into smaller "bites" allowing the user more direct discretion over where and how much of the total deployed assets are used.
In essence, when you deploy (for example) nanohives in smaller quantities per drop you have vastly reduced need to pick them up because they are likely to be fully consumed at the time you deploy them. (Feel free to ask questions if my explanation is unclear)
See a cool idea thread? Mail me the title and I'll take a look =)
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |