| Pages: 1  :: [one page] | 
      
      
        | Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) | 
      
      
        |  Silver Strike44
 Fatal Absolution
 General Tso's Alliance
 
 173
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 16:40:00 -
          [1] - Quote 
 I never really got this straight, how does precision vs dampening work? Do the numbers round to the nearest whole number? Do they always round up? In the case of a tie, the dampener defeats the scanner, right? Help me out here.
 
 Me: Donate to The Rammeh McRam House Charity. Scrub: What's the cause? Rammeh: I'm retarded. | 
      
      
        |  Leadfoot10
 Molon Labe.
 General Tso's Alliance
 
 1764
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 16:44:00 -
          [2] - Quote 
 My understanding is the dB rounds to the nearest tenth, then in the event of a tie, the scanned as opposed to the scanner wins.
 | 
      
      
        |  Silver Strike44
 Fatal Absolution
 General Tso's Alliance
 
 173
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 16:46:00 -
          [3] - Quote 
 How sure are you?
 
 Me: Donate to The Rammeh McRam House Charity. Scrub: What's the cause? Rammeh: I'm retarded. | 
      
      
        |  RayRay James
 Vengeance Unbound
 Dark Taboo
 
 544
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 17:04:00 -
          [4] - Quote 
 
 Silver Strike44 wrote:How sure are you? 
 Let's see
 
 Lead has a 97.24% of being correct
 you have a 97.23% of him bull$hitting you.
 | 
      
      
        |  Silver Strike44
 Fatal Absolution
 General Tso's Alliance
 
 174
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 17:07:00 -
          [5] - Quote 
 
 RayRay James wrote:Silver Strike44 wrote:How sure are you? Let's see Lead has a 97.24% of being correct you have a 97.23% of him bull$hitting you. 
 Well, when rounded to the nearest tenth, both numbers come out to be 97.2, so I, the scammed, should defeat the scammer in this instance of a tie.
 
 Me: Donate to The Rammeh McRam House Charity. Scrub: What's the cause? Rammeh: I'm retarded. | 
      
      
        |  Varoth Drac
 Vengeance Unbound
 Dark Taboo
 
 293
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 17:08:00 -
          [6] - Quote 
 They are rounded to the nearest whole number. If it's a tie the scanner wins.
 | 
      
      
        |  RayRay James
 Vengeance Unbound
 Dark Taboo
 
 544
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 17:10:00 -
          [7] - Quote 
 
 Silver Strike44 wrote:RayRay James wrote:Silver Strike44 wrote:How sure are you? Let's see Lead has a 97.24% of being correct you have a 97.23% of him bull$hitting you. Well, when rounded to the nearest tenth, both numbers come out to be 97.2, so I, the scammed, should defeat the scammer in this instance of a tie. 
 I never said who the scanner was
  | 
      
      
        |  Silver Strike44
 Fatal Absolution
 General Tso's Alliance
 
 174
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 17:15:00 -
          [8] - Quote 
 
 RayRay James wrote:Silver Strike44 wrote:RayRay James wrote:Silver Strike44 wrote:How sure are you? Let's see Lead has a 97.24% of being correct you have a 97.23% of him bull$hitting you. Well, when rounded to the nearest tenth, both numbers come out to be 97.2, so I, the scammed, should defeat the scammer in this instance of a tie. I never said who the scanner was   
 I know, but someone was clearly trying to scam me, making me the scammed.
 
 
 Me: Donate to The Rammeh McRam House Charity. Scrub: What's the cause? Rammeh: I'm retarded. | 
      
      
        |  Leadfoot10
 Molon Labe.
 General Tso's Alliance
 
 1766
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 17:42:00 -
          [9] - Quote 
 
 Varoth Drac wrote:They are rounded to the nearest whole number. If it's a tie the scanner wins. 
 Where did you get this information, if you don't mind my asking?
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Arkena Wyrnspire
 Fatal Absolution
 
 18270
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 17:50:00 -
          [10] - Quote 
 I am tolerably certain that it's to the nearest whole number.
 
 There was a fair bit of testing done by the scout registry previously.
 
 You have long since made your choice. What you make now is a mistake. GM Scotsman is my hero. | 
      
      
        |  Leadfoot10
 Molon Labe.
 General Tso's Alliance
 
 1766
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 18:14:00 -
          [11] - Quote 
 In looking at the CCP spreadsheet that was provided for Delta, it does appear it's rounded to the nearest whole number.
 
 What about the tie? Who wins?
 | 
      
      
        |  Varoth Drac
 Vengeance Unbound
 Dark Taboo
 
 293
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 18:30:00 -
          [12] - Quote 
 Denizens of the Barbershop tested it and concluded that ties go to the scanner, as far as I know.
 | 
      
      
        |  Varoth Drac
 Vengeance Unbound
 Dark Taboo
 
 293
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 18:36:00 -
          [13] - Quote 
 In fact, it's written on the top of the page of the EWAR spreadsheet on page 1 of the Barbershop.
 | 
      
      
        |  Leadfoot10
 Molon Labe.
 General Tso's Alliance
 
 1768
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 19:01:00 -
          [14] - Quote 
 
 Varoth Drac wrote:In fact, it's written on the top of the page of the EWAR spreadsheet on page 1 of the Barbershop. 
 Link, please.
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Llast 326
 An Arkhos
 
 4943
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 19:04:00 -
          [15] - Quote 
 
 Leadfoot10 wrote:Varoth Drac wrote:In fact, it's written on the top of the page of the EWAR spreadsheet on page 1 of the Barbershop. Link, please. Here you go
 
 Not my paper
 
 But have independently tested and found it accurate
 
 
 
 KRRROOOOOOM | 
      
      
        |  Son-Of A-Gun
 Onslaught Inc
 RISE of LEGION
 
 1333
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 19:24:00 -
          [16] - Quote 
 
 Llast 326 wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Here you goVaroth Drac wrote:In fact, it's written on the top of the page of the EWAR spreadsheet on page 1 of the Barbershop. Link, please. Not my paper  But have independently tested and found it accurate  
 Base scan precision isn't 40. It's 35. Fail.
 
 {:)}{3GÇó> | 
      
      
        |  Llast 326
 An Arkhos
 
 4944
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 19:24:00 -
          [17] - Quote 
 
 Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Llast 326 wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Here you goVaroth Drac wrote:In fact, it's written on the top of the page of the EWAR spreadsheet on page 1 of the Barbershop. Link, please. Not my paper  But have independently tested and found it accurate  Base scan precision isn't 40. It's 35. Fail. See those tabs at the bottomGǪ
 Use em
  
 KRRROOOOOOM | 
      
      
        |  Kensai Dragon
 DUST University
 Ivy League
 
 10
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 20:55:00 -
          [18] - Quote 
 
 Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Llast 326 wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Here you goVaroth Drac wrote:In fact, it's written on the top of the page of the EWAR spreadsheet on page 1 of the Barbershop. Link, please. Not my paper  But have independently tested and found it accurate  Base scan precision isn't 40. It's 35. Fail. 
 I believe Profile is 35, Precision is 40.
 
 | 
      
      
        |  Leadfoot10
 Molon Labe.
 General Tso's Alliance
 
 1771
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 21:20:00 -
          [19] - Quote 
 
 Llast 326 wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Here you goVaroth Drac wrote:In fact, it's written on the top of the page of the EWAR spreadsheet on page 1 of the Barbershop. Link, please. Not my paper  But have independently tested and found it accurate  
 Thank you.
 
 Have to run some more tests......and update my own version of this data.
 
 What's really odd is that when we tested the calculations based on my (mistaken) assumptions, they appear to result in the same results (i.e. who is scanned and who is not).
 
 Thanks again....Leadfoot
 | 
      
      
        |  Llast 326
 An Arkhos
 
 4945
 
 
      | Posted - 2014.10.20 21:26:00 -
          [20] - Quote 
 
 Leadfoot10 wrote:Llast 326 wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Here you goVaroth Drac wrote:In fact, it's written on the top of the page of the EWAR spreadsheet on page 1 of the Barbershop. Link, please. Not my paper  But have independently tested and found it accurate  Thank you. Have to run some more tests......and update my own version of this data. What's really odd is that when we tested the calculations based on my (mistaken) assumptions, they appear to result in the same results (i.e. who is scanned and who is not). Thanks again....Leadfoot Most definitive test I ran was using against a Vehicle Scanner and getting my profile to match exactlyGǪ they could still see me as soon as I was a whole number under they could not. But that was way back in HAV 514GǪ have not done a more recent test, but as far as I know the basics have not changed.
 
 KRRROOOOOOM | 
      
        |  |  | 
      
      
        | Pages: 1  :: [one page] |