DUST Search - Unnecessary deletion of posts and data transparency

Aeon Amadi wrote:

Tesfa Alem wrote:

Really? I didn't think ther was anything inappropiate about the post you made before, except perhaps it was in the wrong thread on dispersion. Did the other thread you start get deleted as well?

The mods here are really starting to put the hammer down on anything critical of CCP latley. People are getting banned left, right and center.

I support you in trying to get some more transparency which as you have shown is not CCP policy when it comes to specific instances. It shouldn't be open 24hrs a day, but when the montly cycle of buff nerf x,y, z comes along, it would be excellent to share what data they got proving so, instead of referring to it vaguely.

Logibro took a big step forward just by breaking down how dispersion is roughly calculated.

I didn't either but given the rampant SJW response of IWS, I must have said something that struck a particular nerve.

Absolutely agree on the Logibro bit but I'm personally interested in usage statistics. How many of 'x' suit type (light/medium/heavy) is being used on a bar chart, yanno? Suits, modules, weapons, vehicles.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Tesfa Alem Death by Disassociation 220	Posted - 2014.10.09 05:03:00 - [1] - Quote Really? I didn't think ther was anything inappropiate about the post you made before, except perhaps it was in the wrong thread on dispersion. Did the other thread you start get deleted as well? The mods here are really starting to put the hammer down on anything critical of CCP latley. People are getting banned left, right and center. I support you in trying to get some more transparency which as you have shown is not CCP policy when it comes to specific instances. It shouldn't be open 24hrs a day, but when the montly cycle of buff nerf x,y, z comes along, it would be excellent to share what data they got proving so, instead of referring to it vaguely. Logibro took a big step forward just by breaking down how dispersion is roughly calculated. Redline for Thee, but no Redline for Me.
Tesfa Alem Death by Disassociation 220	Posted - 2014.10.09 06:55:00 - [2] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: Really? I didn't think ther was anything inappropiate about the post you made before, except perhaps it was in the wrong thread on dispersion. Did the other thread you start get deleted as well? The mods here are really starting to put the hammer down on anything critical of CCP latley. People are getting banned left, right and center. I support you in trying to get some more transparency which as you have shown is not CCP policy when it comes to specific instances. It shouldn't be open 24hrs a day, but when the montly cycle of buff nerf x,y, z comes along, it would be excellent to share what data they got proving so, instead of referring to it vaguely. Logibro took a big step forward just by breaking down how dispersion is roughly calculated. I didn't either but given the rampant SJW response of IWS, I must have said something that struck a particular nerve. Absolutely agree on the Logibro bit but I'm personally interested in usage statistics. How many of 'x' suit type (light/medium/heavy) is being used on a bar chart, yanno? Suits, modules, weapons, vehicles. I understand but ther has to be some bounds of reason. Its our hobby but thier full time job, we don't need to nit pick into thier day to day office details. I would be pissed if a customer where i work kept on insisting on seeing my files on demand. I would just leave it at we are changing this x stat because of the following numbers a,b, and c because of the disparity caompared to the rest of d,e, and f. Thats fair, and the devs wont have to dig around for every file we demand. ts the evidence they already looked at , just typed up for us. We dont need the day to day stuff and are not entitles to it. Redline for Thee, but no Redline for Me.