|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
4620
   |
Posted - 2014.10.06 21:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Rami Hamilo wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:The reality on the ADS, was that it was an incredible outlier statistically. It's still overpowered, depending how you measure it, it's just... less OP now than it was before. Plenty of ADS players have stated otherwise, but they're also heavily biased, and the reality is, they're just closer to the level of play others experience now. I know we aren't supposed to swear, but that statement is bullshit. Do you actually listen to the community? I've listened to non pilots that say that the ADS nerf was a bit too much. ADS could always be handled with decent AV. Always. I sometimes fly dropships and this nerf was kind of ridiculous. Now they are wanting to change the whole ADS meta by changing the Python and Incubus bonuses? Where do they get off on that?
Yes, they do listen.
When the Charlie sniper recticle change didn't go over well in all situations, they got feedback and now have different recticles for different SRs.
When the Cal Scout slot changes were occurring before Charlie, they were originally slated to have 1 LS at advanced, and the community convinced them to keep the 2 LS at advanced.
There are many other examples of devs listening to feedback. Just because they don't always do exactly what we want doesn't mean they aren't collaborative.
You can always tell a Millford Minja
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
4624
|
Posted - 2014.10.06 21:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Rami Hamilo wrote:mollerz wrote:I think the issue you are taking umbrage with isn't whether the devs play or don't play.
The game has always suffered from a severe lack of QA. And I think that is the concern you actually have. Yes, that is it, actually. CCP plays things so close to the chest it's ridiculous. I also love how defensive people are getting for Ratatata
Yeah, its weird.
It is almost like some people have been here a very long time, and got nearly completely ignored by the Devs then working on the game, as they ran it into the ground before abandoning it only to have Rattati come in and actually listing to the players and make reasonable adjustments that actually improved the game much more than that larger group of Devs and manpower did in the many months they had.
We should probably just ignore that effort since the game isn't perfect and we all don't get exactly what we want when we want it...
You can always tell a Millford Minja
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
4624
|
Posted - 2014.10.06 21:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Rami Hamilo wrote:Those don't really count, in my opinion, since they don't change the meta of the game. People were fine with the old recticles, just more people wanted them different. Having 1 LS for the adv Cal Scout was fine, it's just more people didn't want to change their gameplay with an adv cal scout cause they didn't want to use a proto.
The changes they've been making have been changing the meta of the game drastically. My real question is 'Do they play their own game and do they see the effects of their changes if they do, in fact, play their own game'?
Look at the Bolt pistol. It can three shot, or four shot, ANYTHING on the board right now. Sure, they reduced the RoF, but it still does a metric ton of damage per shot, even without a damage mod or prof.
MLT gear is more on the terms of ADV/Proto gear for their price. Have they listened to the people that want MLT gear nerfed more? It took them what, 5 patches to put the Battle Academy back to what it was. Well, at least almost back to what it was.
Lets look at the meta as it is now:
Greater suit variety than ever before.
Greater weapon variety than ever before.
Such a crappy meta Rattati and Logibro have put together...
You can always tell a Millford Minja
|
One Eyed King
Land of the BIind
4624
|
Posted - 2014.10.06 22:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
Rami Hamilo wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Rami Hamilo wrote:Those don't really count, in my opinion, since they don't change the meta of the game. People were fine with the old recticles, just more people wanted them different. Having 1 LS for the adv Cal Scout was fine, it's just more people didn't want to change their gameplay with an adv cal scout cause they didn't want to use a proto.
The changes they've been making have been changing the meta of the game drastically. My real question is 'Do they play their own game and do they see the effects of their changes if they do, in fact, play their own game'?
Look at the Bolt pistol. It can three shot, or four shot, ANYTHING on the board right now. Sure, they reduced the RoF, but it still does a metric ton of damage per shot, even without a damage mod or prof.
MLT gear is more on the terms of ADV/Proto gear for their price. Have they listened to the people that want MLT gear nerfed more? It took them what, 5 patches to put the Battle Academy back to what it was. Well, at least almost back to what it was. Lets look at the meta as it is now: Greater suit variety than ever before. Greater weapon variety than ever before. Such a crappy meta Rattati and Logibro have put together... Before, there were no Logistics specialization. That was a greater variety. Before, assault suits and commandos didn't have a 'You use this weapon because you get the bonus' Right now, there is a right way and a wrong way to fit every single suit. If you can't see that, you're an idiot. Sorry, but you are.
Look, you are just a whiny brat not getting his way.
Lots of players have lots of different fits and play styles.
If you can't see that, YOU are the idiot.
If you have legit complaints, perhaps stating them with a little more logically and rationally will be more productive than this sense of entitlement you seem to have.
You can always tell a Millford Minja
|
|
|
| |
|