Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Kyoudai Furinkazan
1238
   |
Posted - 2014.10.05 03:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why does this BS keep coming up ..??.. if I have 20 or 30 min in vehicles , I shouldn't be handcuffed to players who haven't help me accumulate a single skill point in any placement in any area of my vehicle usage .
It's like me forcing infantry to have two players , one to operate the suit and the other to shoot the guns .
This is the worst idea ever when it comes to this instance , squad play is enough ... every asset shouldn't by tied to extra players who are not helping to accumulate any points to be place in any area's of functionality .
If this is the case then the same should go for infantry as well .
You people really know how to frack up a good thing and instances like these are part of the reason that this game has been in a negative for a long time now , because of un necessary " enhancements " that actually ruin game play then enhance it .
Leave vehicles the way that they are and leave it " optional " for the pilot's or users to equip turrets if they like and not be forced to , to have an effective fit or vehicle .
This is just a bad idea .
Why should other players get to dictate how I play , when they don't help put in work to acquire the necessary skill points , would know what area's are of concern .. as far as how I operate vehicles , to administer the skill points nor should I have to be shackled to players that shoot at everything under the sun and bail because of spent ammo and another vehicle confrontation ?
They have NO TIES to my personal effort , so why should they tell me how to operate my vehicle that I worked hard in earning MY SKILL POINTS to acquire but now because of some " brainchild's " idea , I have to be handcuffed to other players for me to function?
Just a flat out bad idea .
Delta should come with a SP or infantry SP refund so that a campaign for one is not needed .
|
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Kyoudai Furinkazan
1238
|
Posted - 2014.10.05 12:37:00 -
[2] - Quote
It still is a flawed theory .
How can you even begin to equate a drop suit of a single player , even a heavy because that's the top in HP's ... to a HAV that has almost 5 times the amount of HP's and you definitely can't compare it to a scout for balance because the scout has the least SP's .
Trying to balance a vehicle's effectiveness in comparison to a infantry player is just flat out a bad idea .
There are many things that a dropship can do that a HAV can't or a LAV even , now would it be fair to try to balance anyone or all of the three in comparison to each other ?
That's just a flawed attempt , much less to infantry .
A vehicle cant hack a null , jump over a ledge in the lab , go into the lower lab region to hack a storage depot or sit on top of the MCC and snipe opposing players ... so there are many things that vehicles can't do that infantry can , a vehicle can't come upon you without making any noise ... cloaked and NK and SG you to death .
I shouldn't have to have three players in my HAV if it's not in my best interest to do so and it shouldn't be mandatory as well for me to place a turret on any vehicle for it to be effective , if that's not my choice .
HAV's are not OP in the least and definitely no where as near as an ADS will be , if anything AV is OP because you can use proto and advanced weapons against militia and standard vehicles and I know that I'm not the only one who could solo a tank or LAV or a ADS even , so this is not a problem and this discussion is not even considerate or reflective of the fact that vehicles take a massive amount of skill points in operation , acquiring turrets and making them proficient , having your core to the point where one's vehicle is effective and to actually operate a vehicle .
Now after doing all of that , you would like to make it mandatory for a user to have to have turrets placed and manned on vehicles for them to become effective ?
This sounds like one who doesn't use vehicles , trying to dictate to those who have invested in doing so ... how to play and regulating the style of gameplay .
This is just a bad idea and should be the choice to the user and not forced by an opinion .
This is why players fight to have their roles maintained after they placed a massive amount of SP's into a role and why right now vehicle usage is so bland , because of people and their opinions and random changes made ... that were not needed to begin with .
This is just an example of why your not seeing the next tier of vehicles , examples like this topic or the fact that once they are reintroduced and no matter how CCP changes them , the community will cry that they are overpowered and the fact that some of you have said that now , creates a question of ... do they operate vehicles themselves and do the anti-vehicle , because if they did then they would understand how delicate the environment is right now and to complicate it would be a step in the wrong direction , even more so ... after the recent steps forward that have been made .
I can swarm and forge any vehicle by my self , without help ... now I'm sure that the next tier won't be that way and rightfully so but creating changes that are unwarranted will do nothing but hurt the environment .
LAV pilots say that AV is OP , ADS pilots are talking about how OP AV is now and HAV pilots really don't say anything any more unless someone ruffle their feathers because of how it was while they were OP and after the AV buff .
Now it's coming into balance , don't screw with that .
You people are forgetting that you are using pro and advanced weapons against , militia and standard vehicles and that AV is somewhat overpowered but rightfully so .
You people are more and more trying to change the environment for the solo players and that's just dictatorial .
In a game that touts that " one has the option of custom in creating their experience " , it seems that you are trying to take away the choices of the individual .
Delta should come with a SP or infantry SP refund so that a campaign for one is not needed .
|
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Kyoudai Furinkazan
1239
|
Posted - 2014.10.05 15:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
I remember that and the reaction to the ideas that were given as an example and a lot in the community did " flip out " at just the ideal and the discussion that was put forth by the DEV's .
It was a little dramatic , the reactions were .. just from the discussions alone .
Now look at what we have in it's place , nothing and that was just from a over reaction from some in the community and the unwillingness to even discuss the ideas that were brought to the table .
Delta should come with a SP or infantry SP refund so that a campaign for one is not needed .
|