|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Canis Ferox
Onikanabo Brigade
Caldari State
27
   |
Posted - 2014.10.21 19:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ok so basically, you can f**k off. That's the new stance on snipers. You're K/D is too high, so we're removing the range from your ranged weapon. Go cry in a.. oh you're playing something else already.
We all know the sniper rifle can only be used from distances which in real life would be considered extreme: The sort of range you see in films like Shooter, Enemy at the Gates, but NOT the likely range used by snipers covering friendlies in the field, who tend to be a lot closer (as far as my armchair expertise goes).
I want real sniper rifles. The new range is fine for me, but can I get something that I can aim at a target, say 250m away but also kill someone 30m away; something I can use quickly and then move, not sit on a hive in the hills all day relentlessly executing the same clueless, respawning noob and the occasional scout.
I don't snipe. The action in this game is too intense and I like to be involved directly, not watching from the red zone. But the real reason is. The rifle is ****. I know it is for balance, but why would anyone ever make a mag-fed rifle with only 3 Fuggin bullets per CliP!! It is boring. And I don't always have a mouse handy.
I only counter-snipe. Something I will do begrudgingly if I die three times to the same sniper. And then I always win. Always, love sniping! Love it. I think people who do it all day are twats.
Yup, that's you.
I don't care anymore, sorry.
Can we STOP rebalancing this game now please!
+ö+ò+P+æ+Ö
|
Canis Ferox
Onikanabo Brigade
Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 19:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Binoculars and Tagging
Binoculars, telescopes, things wot allow you to see far without using a rifle scope. Soldiers have 'em now, why not in the future?
I am a scout and I play like a scout. I actually 'scout' I don't engage unless I have advantage, I don't shotgun cloak 'n runoft, I don't use knifes. I keep at range, hack in silence and keep good comms with my teammates. Great aren't I?
I just want some binoculars, so I can spot for snipers and tanks and everyone else. I also need to be able to TAG targets: The technology is already there within the game and it is broken: A squad leader can call out a target, such as an HAV and it'll stay highlighted for all to see forever. That doesn't make sense - how can the scanner keep track of something it cannot detect?
But what I suggest is better and fair. If you have a foe in sight with a red triangle overhead you should be able to 'tag' him - highlight him so he appears as a priority target on your allies' radars. It makes tactical sense, it is fair, it is a communication and warning device: It is cool. Once he is without range of all scanners he appears normal again.
But tanks are way too sneaky: They are big, loud, noisy but if one ducks in cover for a second it disappears from your radar: this is silly. It should be tracked and obvious - once you've seen it and as long as it is in range it MUST be visible; how can it not be? Also it should take at least 3 seconds to fade away - even with headphones I cannot tell the direct a tank is in - that is due to lack of comms between your in game character to you the user not in game perception and must be rectified.
this is not a balance - it is a mechanic fault fix
+ö+ò+P+æ+Ö
|
Canis Ferox
Onikanabo Brigade
Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 19:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
Quote:"What good would it do to stop balancing the game?
That would be really stupid."
It's done man. it is DONE. It is balanced enough. It'll do. it's mostly fine!
Focus on new content, new gamemodes, new weapons, events, design, matchmaking - exciting things!
Not the little, fiddly, tiny, microscopic adjustment of a particular weapons rate of fire or the range of plasmas vs assault. **** that! every time they do it they just **** a whole new group of people over. The last change I approved was the Mass driver, but only because they hit it way too hard with the nerf hammer (1.3??) - and they only did that because it was silly OP before. It's roughly right now, can we get a new skin on a map please?
OR some rain effects instead of just either dimness or volcanic eruption? or how about some frikkin foliage?
I mean - why are we fighting over all these bits of background stage from 90s sci fi flicks anyway? It's like the staged moon landing up in here!
+ö+ò+P+æ+Ö
|
|
|
| |
|