|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
5247
   |
Posted - 2014.09.26 14:36:00 -
[1] - Quote
Meh.
Want to talk physics?
Let's talk insta-spin.
Let's talk backpedal speed.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
5247
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 15:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vell0cet wrote:I do think taking damage should decloak you.
Would love if flux grenade depleted cloak reserve and disabled cloak.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
5249
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 16:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Right-wing Extremist wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Vell0cet wrote:I do think taking damage should decloak you. Would love if flux grenade depleted cloak reserve and disabled cloak. THIS I agree with. The flux grenade, being what it is, should interfere with the cloak's electronics and put it straight into cooldown.
Precisely. We should put this on the "if we get one client-side update" list ...
Along with the eject buttons for vehicles, a smarter tacnet/ewar system, strafe acceleration tweaks, etc.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
5252
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 17:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
Fox Gaden wrote:
The only nerf I would impose is to increase the movement penalty of Armour Plate when equipped on Light Frame suits. (Only the Armor Plate, not the Reactive or Ferosteel.)
Also if favor, assuming the statistics demonstrate a need to do so.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
5260
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 20:09:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:Fox Gaden wrote:
I would also like to see a very small (0.5 db?) profile penalty on Shield Extenders.
Double penalties for stacking health on scouts. Double movement penalty, double depleted Regan delay. Baboon.
If shield tanking a Scout were overly effective, we'd see Shield Regulated CalScouts allover the place. We don't. Reason being, shields aren't a problem. This is proposal would f*ck over perfectly innocent Minmatar Scouts, who are finally performing on par with the others.
Why nerf what isn't at issue?
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
5266
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 22:46:00 -
[6] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Fox Gaden wrote:
I would also like to see a very small (0.5 db?) profile penalty on Shield Extenders.
Double penalties for stacking health on scouts. Double movement penalty, double depleted Regan delay. Baboon. If shield tanking a Scout were overly effective, we'd see Shield Regulated CalScouts allover the place. We don't. Instead, we see uparmed GA and AM Scouts. Reason being, shields aren't a problem; the brick simply works better. This proposal would f*ck over perfectly innocent Minmatar Scouts, who are finally performing on par with the others. Why nerf what isn't at issue? Because doubling a penalty to depleted regen on scouts doesn't take away much more time. Twice the penalty on a tiny number is still a tiny number.
Can't decide which quip to go with:
A nerf for the sake of a nerf.
or
If it ain't broke, don't nerf it.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
|
|
| |
|