|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Thumb Green
Raymond James Corp
1538
   |
Posted - 2014.09.25 14:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
It's amazing how some people think ADS' are heavy aircraft.
We don't kick ass, we kick dick and we kick it hard.
Join us in our Pumpkin Crushing
|
Thumb Green
Raymond James Corp
1541
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Echo 1991 wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Gabriella Grey wrote:Starting this to have Assault Dropships viable again. With the new rate of fire along with the Afterburner changes Assault Dropships are not serving their role. What we want as pilots is our old rate of fire and operation of our turrets back. With our old ROF and turret operation Assault dropships can at least have a fighting chance again. This isn't a petition for Afterburner changes but turret changes done to the Turrets. Please like or sign below so as pilots we can update this list.
Pilots:
Gabriella Grey
fish sticks24 But what pilots want doesn't matter. All CCP cares about is making sure infantry is comfortable. Funny, I remember super tanks and they didn't go away for a while. They were only "super tanks" because nobody took our advice on how to destroy us. Funny though, I notice those whose first language isn't English, that probably don't visit this language's forums, have zero problem beating me back into my redline. Why? Because they don't care about taking out AV to destroy me. A pair of forge guns, a pair of swarms, and 2 guys putting down proxies and/or REs. Why? Because they'll do anything to win.
Uhm, probably has more to do with you being a sh!tty tanker. I mean, you're the guy that's been getting killed by militia swarms since open beta; even after they where nerfed in damage and only could fire 2 volleys before having to reload, damage mods were nerfed, and tanks were buffed all in 1.7. You came on here complaining about getting killed by militia swarms.
Also loved how one sided your advise was. To paraphrase "If you AV guys want to be able to take out one guy in a tank you've got to use teamwork; the fact that the tanker doesn't have to use teamwork is completely irrelevant". Your whole arguement revolved around "it's a tank, one infantryman shouldn't be able to take it down even with weapons specifically designed to do that" which completely ignores the fact that a single infantryman has been able to take out tanks since WW2.
We don't kick ass, we kick dick and we kick it hard.
Join us in our Pumpkin Crushing
|
Thumb Green
Raymond James Corp
1542
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Skippy Longstocking wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Skippy Longstocking wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Can you honestly give me a rational argument as to why a rifle should be a serious threat to a vehicle? Where did this come from? Who EVER said that a RIFLE should be a serious threat to a vehicle?  Infantry did a while back. So, I'm waiting for an answer. You're complaining that the only threats to vehicles are AV weapons. What would you like rifles to do to vehicles? I don't know where you THINK you saw this, but go back and read it again, because I don't think it says what you think it does. NEVER have I seen ANYONE say that a rifle should be a threat to a vehicle. EVER. Considering you only have 43 likes, you haven't been here long. Read what I said again. Infantry did a while back. If you haven't been lurking for at least a year, you wouldn't've seen it.
I've never seen a serious demand from infantry for rifles to be a serious threat to vehicles and I've been here since January of open beta. Now I have seen plenty of tanker troll threads along the lines of "hur, hur, my AR can't kill a tank, buff AR and nerf tanks hur, hur"; some of which where from you if I recall correctly.
We don't kick ass, we kick dick and we kick it hard.
Join us in our Pumpkin Crushing
|
|
|
| |
|