DUST Search - *** 1.8 DELTA ADS DROPSHiP PETITION ***

Spkr4theDead wrote:

Bahirae Serugiusu wrote:

Spkr4theDead wrote:

Gabriella Grey wrote:

Starting this to have Assault Dropships viable again. With the new rate of fire along with the Afterburner changes Assault Dropships are not serving their role. What we want as pilots is our old rate of fire and operation of our turrets back. With our old ROF and turret operation Assault dropships can at least have a fighting chance again. This isn't a petition for Afterburner changes but turret changes done to the Turrets. Please like or sign below so as pilots we can update this list.

Pilots:

Gabriella Grey
fish sticks24

But what pilots want doesn't matter. All CCP cares about is making sure infantry is comfortable.

Yes because being near immune to all small arms fire with the only things able to kill you being one of three AV weapons which have limited use against infantry, a tank that can barely aim up, or installation turrets with a massive blindspot and short range clearly indicates that infantry have an easy job killing ADS.

Ever seen video of Taliban firing their rifles at an Abrams tank? You know what happens? Absolutely nothing, as has happened since the beginning of tank warfare in WWI. That's exactly how it should be.

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Killar-12 The Corporate Raiders Top Men. 3312	Posted - 2014.09.26 02:24:00 - [1] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: Bahirae Serugiusu wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Gabriella Grey wrote: Starting this to have Assault Dropships viable again. With the new rate of fire along with the Afterburner changes Assault Dropships are not serving their role. What we want as pilots is our old rate of fire and operation of our turrets back. With our old ROF and turret operation Assault dropships can at least have a fighting chance again. This isn't a petition for Afterburner changes but turret changes done to the Turrets. Please like or sign below so as pilots we can update this list. Pilots: Gabriella Grey fish sticks24 But what pilots want doesn't matter. All CCP cares about is making sure infantry is comfortable. Yes because being near immune to all small arms fire with the only things able to kill you being one of three AV weapons which have limited use against infantry, a tank that can barely aim up, or installation turrets with a massive blindspot and short range clearly indicates that infantry have an easy job killing ADS. Ever seen video of Taliban firing their rifles at an Abrams tank? You know what happens? Absolutely nothing, as has happened since the beginning of tank warfare in WWI. That's exactly how it should be. You ever see what a 280mm cannon does to a structure? but when I drop OBs **** still survies fairly well, thing is I don't cry about not being strong enough jace that person could always be a bad pilot, anecdotal evidence should be avoided for a logical arguement, for an emotional or ethical one it's fine. Reg, you're on the ball. on both statements Resistance and all ADS pilots 5% sure, OR as long as there's no plain damage bonus that ADSes provide, 10% even would be reasonable I'd like to see a high ROF, because you're going to reload more often and resupply more if you have higher ROF which allows for higher DPS, and a 15% reload bonus, would be reasonable and once 100% is reached (Skill Stacking) the math would go screwy making the reload either instaenous or make the DS explode into a singularity.... http://evil-guide.tripod.com/