DUST Search - Rattati, Small Blasters as Main Turret for HAVs?

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

Rattati, Small Blasters as Main Turret for HAVs?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
MarasdF Loron Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 1060	Posted - 2014.09.16 13:29:00 - [1] - Quote So is this a confirmation that we are going to be able to fit Small Blasters as Main Turret for tanks? Please say yes. CCP Rattati wrote: You can hover and kill non AV HAV's
The dark cloud The Rainbow Effect 4112	Posted - 2014.09.16 14:43:00 - [2] - Quote That tank would look like a abomination. They say when you die you see a white light which then forms the line of: "GAME OVER! PLEASE INSERT COIN"
MarasdF Loron Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 1062	Posted - 2014.09.16 14:58:00 - [3] - Quote The dark cloud wrote: That tank would look like a abomination. No shiet. But that would be the only non AV tank there is. According to CCP Rattati himself.
Vulpes Dolosus Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 2069	Posted - 2014.09.16 15:09:00 - [4] - Quote I see what you did there. Lol. Dust was real! I was there!
ACT1ON BASTARD Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 154	Posted - 2014.09.17 08:28:00 - [5] - Quote I know he thinks all tanks are av, wtf??!!!

CCP Rattati C C P C C P Alliance 7256	Posted - 2014.09.17 10:20:00 - [6] - Quote MarasdF Loron wrote: The dark cloud wrote: That tank would look like a abomination. No shiet. But that would be the only non AV tank there is. According to CCP Rattati himself. Oh snap "As well as stupid, Rattati is incredibly slow and accident-prone, and cannot even swim"

KEROSIINI-TERO The Rainbow Effect 1285	Posted - 2014.09.17 10:49:00 - [7] - Quote I would say BIG YES for "small turret as main turret" -tanks Only if it wouldn't mess up the PG/CPU balance of tanks. A tank with only a small turret would have full complex rack in highs and lows. ...Oh wait, shield tanks can already have almost that. And HAVs haven't been invincible for a long time no matter what their fitting. Never mind. Bring in the small turrets on top! People would enjoy Dust a lot more if they accepted the fact that EVERYTHING is subject to change
KEROSIINI-TERO The Rainbow Effect 1285	Posted - 2014.09.17 10:50:00 - [8] - Quote On a more serios note, a tank with single small turret might not be too OP vs infantry. That could be the real infantry support vehicle in current meta. People would enjoy Dust a lot more if they accepted the fact that EVERYTHING is subject to change
Meee One Hello Kitty Logistics 1148	Posted - 2014.09.17 11:34:00 - [9] - Quote KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: On a more serios note, a tank with single small turret might not be too OP vs infantry. That could be the real infantry support vehicle in current meta. Or even better,an HAV with 3 light turrets! Ground bound derpship anyone? Was banned for fighting for logistics survival on 7/25/2014 02:11. Logistics will never be respected.
MarasdF Loron Fatal Absolution General Tso's Alliance 1066	Posted - 2014.09.17 13:55:00 - [10] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: The dark cloud wrote: That tank would look like a abomination. No shiet. But that would be the only non AV tank there is. According to CCP Rattati himself. Oh snap Is that a "yes"?

TOOMANY NAMES ALREADYTAKEn Going for the gold 150	Posted - 2014.09.17 14:49:00 - [11] - Quote Make it "The MAV" "Medium Assault Vehicle" A tank desinged for killing infantry, how cool would that be! 32 kills with militia shotgun. OP? naaaaaah
Fox Gaden Immortal Guides 4268	Posted - 2014.09.17 16:14:00 - [12] - Quote TOOMANY NAMES ALREADYTAKEn wrote: Make it "The MAV" "Medium Assault Vehicle" A tank desinged for killing infantry, how cool would that be! Interesting. Say, switch the driver to the Front Small turret, as the driver controls which way the Front is pointing, and replace the Large turret with a small turret. The top small turret would be removed as it was mounted on top of the Large turret on the HAVs. Reduce the HP, add speed, and call it a MAV. I would also like to see passenger seats added, but that might require a client side change. Hand/Eye coordination cannot be taught. For everything else there is the Learning Coalition.
Tebu Gan Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 1200	Posted - 2014.09.17 16:37:00 - [13] - Quote CCP Rattati wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: The dark cloud wrote: That tank would look like a abomination. No shiet. But that would be the only non AV tank there is. According to CCP Rattati himself. Oh snap I hear you are also reducing cpu/pg of small turrets, I can already picture a gunnlogi stacking complex extenders AND fully armor tanking. While they may not be much of a challenge against other tanks using smalls, they will be quite devestating against infantry AV. Like, they would be harder to take down than an AV tank, the type of tanks I feel should be the toughest for AV to down, considering they are not much of a threat to them. Tanks - Balancing Turrets
Alena Ventrallis Vengeance Unbound Dark Taboo 1782	Posted - 2014.09.18 03:02:00 - [14] - Quote Meee One wrote: KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: On a more serios note, a tank with single small turret might not be too OP vs infantry. That could be the real infantry support vehicle in current meta. Or even better,an HAV with 3 light turrets! Ground bound derpship anyone? Oh god... Listen to my muscle memory Contemplate what I've been clinging to Forty-six and two ahead of me
TOOMANY NAMES ALREADYTAKEn Going for the gold 152	Posted - 2014.09.18 12:26:00 - [15] - Quote Fox Gaden wrote: TOOMANY NAMES ALREADYTAKEn wrote: Make it "The MAV" "Medium Assault Vehicle" A tank desinged for killing infantry, how cool would that be! Interesting. Say, switch the driver to the Front Small turret, as the driver controls which way the Front is pointing, and replace the Large turret with a small turret. The top small turret would be removed as it was mounted on top of the Large turret on the HAVs. Reduce the HP, add speed, and call it a MAV. I would also like to see passenger seats added, but that might require a client side change. I think making it the size of something between an LAV and an HAV, less HP than HAV's, more than LAV's, faster than HAV's, slower than LAV's, and no passanger seats maybe? 32 kills with militia shotgun. OP? naaaaaah
TheD1CK Dead Man's Game 1237	Posted - 2014.09.18 15:11:00 - [16] - Quote I think Rattati is hiding from the monster he created In terms of a MAV.... If you cross-breed the HAV + DS, clip it's wings and ground the ******... Would it be an abonination.... or a MAV ??? Hidden in my ramblings is the point that, A Ground based DS would be a MAV and to achieve that it would not take much to alter the DS, add some wheels/tracks, move the turrets etc.. Note: I understand Rattati is Gallente and the use of this much ducktape may be frowned upon Innapropriate Irrelevence... Welcome to the Dust Forum, hang around to see why everyone else left :/
CharacterNameWasTaken G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance 33	Posted - 2014.09.18 15:52:00 - [17] - Quote KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: I would say BIG YES for "small turret as main turret" -tanks Only if it wouldn't mess up the PG/CPU balance of tanks. A tank with only a small turret would have full complex rack in highs and lows. ...Oh wait, shield tanks can already have almost that. And HAVs haven't been invincible for a long time no matter what their fitting. Never mind. Bring in the small turrets on top! i would want to fit 3 small turrets so.they sit on the main gun so id have 2 rails and a missle shooting people.


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.