|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
TritusX
PH4NT0M5
15
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 22:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Tectonic Fusion wrote:Temias Mercurial wrote:Tectonic Fusion wrote:My problem with it is it can't compete with the Scrambler Rifle or Combat Rifle. Can't compete -_-? With the hip fire it has, as long as your aim is steady, then you're quite likely to win with a rail rifle. Dont' kid yourself. Yeah...compared to the scr and cr it's DPS is crap. Seriously. Face GOOD players. They don't use the rr.
Jinksy or Jinxy, whatever it is. If I see him running around when I start a match I just shut off the PS3 and play later. That damn Kaalakiaota RR just murders everyone. Also, the RR is so good at CQC for a "ranged" weapon
Scout 514 forever
|
TritusX
PH4NT0M5
15
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 00:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:TritusX wrote:Tectonic Fusion wrote:Temias Mercurial wrote:Tectonic Fusion wrote:My problem with it is it can't compete with the Scrambler Rifle or Combat Rifle. Can't compete -_-? With the hip fire it has, as long as your aim is steady, then you're quite likely to win with a rail rifle. Dont' kid yourself. Yeah...compared to the scr and cr it's DPS is crap. Seriously. Face GOOD players. They don't use the rr. Jinksy or Jinxy, whatever it is. If I see him running around when I start a match I just shut off the PS3 and play later. That damn Kaalakiaota RR just murders everyone. Also, the RR is so good at CQC for a "ranged" weapon Because its rail technology. You do realize the.importance of that in this discussion? Yet and still its ROF is its downfall. The only way I can beat another player in CQC is by outsmarting him in movement. If their accuracy is good, a GEK, SCR, CR and some others can beat me because of its rate of fire. Thus the RR fails in CQC against better.players. I know not to.be.in CQC with those guys. But judging by your post I would wreck you because you're bad at it This is what people are not understanding. They want the RR to be a nerf toy because they employed bad strategy in facing a RR in CQC. You should buff your skill instead of suggesting another RR.nerf. I'm not suggesting another nerf. I'm simply stating what I've seen. I've lost some RR CQC, and I've won some. But what I am saying is that even though CCP is stating that RR is a long ranged weapon, it is unbelievably good in CQC. I was playing with Zindorak earlier and he beat a HMG Heavy in CQC. I just notice these things because that's not how they are supposed to work. Yes the people dying might need to improve their gameplay but even players that I've seen stomp in matches get killed by the RR. And do you know what? we were only 10m away from them. What is this? I tail this guy because I know he is good based on his KDR and WP in that match and we enter one tunnel. I see a guy using a RR. He starts shooting. The guy and I start strafing and shooting. The RR guy kills me or him somehow and then the other guy picks off the RR user. The RR shouldn't even had killed me. The RR is for long range. Not for this CQC.
Scout 514 forever
|
TritusX
PH4NT0M5
16
|
Posted - 2014.09.02 19:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:Smh. So many factors in your post requires a more detailed look.
So about the heavy and Zindorak: Was that just a bad heavy? What is his rating in shield, armor and hmg proficiency? Did he just pay and spray leaving him with no ammo and then killed from reloading? Was Zindorak using scoped or assault variant?
So should the RR shutdown in CQC because its designed as a long range rifle?
Oh wow everybody dies in game including stompers to RR. Thats a reason to nerf? Not.
That guy killed you because you made a mistake in your strafe 1v1 matchup. Hence why the other guy finished off what you started.
All your scenarios mentioned have holes in em and cannot be used as constructive points for nerfing the RR. Those are subjective situationals that are different depending on who you talk to,
A sniper is used for long range suppression and demoralizer, yet under the right.condition, I can blast your skull open in a CQC moment.
Again, those fussing about the RR really need to up their skill. The RR os not even that scary on a competitive level.
Again, not requesting a nerf. Just giving scenarios I have seen/experienced.
Not too sure bout the heavy, just saw them dueling. The aRR is better than the RR in terms of balance, but he was using the Kaalakiaota RR.
It does not need to be shut down but brought down to a lower level. The RR is too good at CQC as a ranged weapon. It should be able to perform weakly in CQC, and best at long range. What it's at now is good at CQC, superb at long range.
Ok. Even if I did mess up, it is still too good. The RR can effectively kill in a 1v1. At most it should really weaken the oppenent or kill in a 2v2 or 2v1 match. The only time a guy can die in a 1v1 with a RR is if he isn't very good. That is how it should be. But right now, a (for example) tanked Cal Scout can engage another tanked Cal Scout and win if he has a RR and the other AR. The other should be able to kill the first Scout because his gun is designed for CQC. The RR however will (in it's current state) win. It is ridiculous.
Ok, your statement about the sniper is pretty good and correct. But the RR is not a chance CQC win. It is not a 25% chance win 75% chance loss. It is more a 60% chance win and 40% chance loss. It should be a 25 chance win, and 75 chance loss. The RR is dominating too much for what it isn't supposed to do. If the sniper rifle had the same problem as the RR, that would mean that the sniper rifle should win most of the time in CQC. But it doesn't. Neither should the RR. The RR is like the sniper, just a little lighter on the range and heavier on DPS.
I may need to myself up my skill, but I've seen (Zindorak specifically) people enter a match with a Kaalakiaota RR and stomp in CQC. Do you know how I know? I am usually in a squad with him, and we enter a battle. He uses his Kaalakiaota RR and I follow him. If we see a guy engage us, Zindorak has killed him already without my help. I walk over to see the corpse thing. ADV scout. Really? That ADV scout was not using a RR and Zindorak was and he killed him with a RR. The ADV scout with his CR (heard the shots) should've killed him. And this isn't some noob scout. He was doing good in that match. And what kills him? A RR. In CQC. RR is supposed to dominate long range, not CQC.
Scout 514 forever
|
|
|
|