|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
12648
   |
Posted - 2014.08.06 21:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
Bojo The Mighty wrote:Paint a Saga red, change armor and speed stats, change slots, BAM, got yourself a Minmatar LAV.
Paint a Maddy gold, change armor and speed stats, change slots, BAM, got yourself an Amarr HAV
Screw that. Paint a Gunlogi Navy Blue and Tan and slap a Khanid Symbol on the front.
BAM KHANID HAV!
"We were commanded us to burn the system...We did. I mourn the loss of the innocent caught in our fires" -Kador Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
12653
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 23:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
Bojo The Mighty wrote:Glitch116 wrote:BUMP FOR JUSTICE!!
placeholders are fine CCP
its been years now damn it i want my rust buckets I personally think that the Minmatar LAV should be called "Loach" *it's a type of minnow!*
I would like the
Amarr MLT to be the Acolyte..... but the Amarr Light Drones are called Acolytes...... Disciple sound fine too.
STD HAV need to be called the Solace, or Redeemer.
Khanid HAV could be called the
Abandon, Hex, Excommunicate..... etc.
"We were commanded us to burn the system...We did. I mourn the loss of the innocent caught in our fires" -Kador Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
12655
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 00:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Last time placeholders was shopped for it got shot down pretty hard.
I am not willing to see a repeat performance.
Who shot it down.....? Its not like we can expect better from CCP after 12 months......
"We were commanded us to burn the system...We did. I mourn the loss of the innocent caught in our fires" -Kador Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
12655
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 01:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mr Hakyou wrote:I'm up for Amarr and Minmatar vehicles looking the same as Gallente and Caldari as long as the stats reflect on the race it is. e.i. Minmatar HAV should be dual tanked. Amarr HAV should be slow, high DPS, and a lot of armor.
..... Minmatar don't really Dual tank.....they either Armour Tank or Shield Tank..... that's their thing...... if they try the dual tank....it rarely works or is effective.....
"We were commanded us to burn the system...We did. I mourn the loss of the innocent caught in our fires" -Kador Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
12655
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 01:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
Galm Fae wrote:Agreed Minmatar actually favor speed. They'd probably get a torque bonus like the old overdrives.
I was, and I dont mean to sound so arguementative...I really don't, that Minmatar would great great top speed but the worst torque..... since their weapons tend to track very well anyway....and knowing how slow Lasers track......... being the slowest top speed, probably as slow in tracking as the rail.... Amarr needs the torque.
"We were commanded us to burn the system...We did. I mourn the loss of the innocent caught in our fires" -Kador Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
12656
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 01:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
Galm Fae wrote:True Adamance wrote:Galm Fae wrote:Agreed Minmatar actually favor speed. They'd probably get a torque bonus like the old overdrives. I was, and I dont mean to sound so arguementative...I really don't, that Minmatar would great great top speed but the worst torque..... since their weapons tend to track very well anyway....and knowing how slow Lasers track......... being the slowest top speed, probably as slow in tracking as the rail.... Amarr needs the torque. Actually, I'm okay with that. The Minmatar seem like the type what would be more concerned in making a car go faster than working about engineering concepts like horsepower, torque, or even traction control. Just drop the biggest engine in with the biggest gun and give it some go juice! Meanwhile, I figure when Amarr tanks have all that extra weight on them from those useless bas-reliefs that they'd need some serious torque to get them moving as it is.
Indeed with a better centre of gravity it should be easier to turn on the spot....
"We were commanded us to burn the system...We did. I mourn the loss of the innocent caught in our fires" -Kador Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
12657
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 01:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:So Amarr vehicles would turn very well, but have a slow top speed and slow acceleration. And Minmatar would go really fast in a straight line, but have problems with corners and such.
Yup and also further balancing on that.....
Autocannon would track quickly being a powerful anti armour DPS weapon to keep up with Minmatar HAV hit and run mobility.
While Lasers would have great range and firepower..... but track slowly requiring the HAV to track on spot to keep up with most targets.
"We were commanded us to burn the system...We did. I mourn the loss of the innocent caught in our fires" -Kador Ouryon
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
12687
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 11:52:00 -
[8] - Quote
Fox Gaden wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Last time placeholders was shopped for it got shot down pretty hard.
I am not willing to see a repeat performance. Last time when placeholders was shot down hard, was this before or after they announced that there would be no assets added to DUST?
Before..... long before.
"We were commanded us to burn the system...We did. I mourn the loss of the innocent caught in our fires" -Kador Ouryon
|
|
|
| |
|