Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Balamob
SVER True Blood Dark Taboo
37
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 14:36:00 -
[1] - Quote
I was basically thinking to switch the damage bonus commando has to assault and vice versa (most of it). This came up with the reasoning that damage bonus is related on finishing a fight as fast as possible related to the assault fragile philosophy compared to comando which has more resilence for its passive EHP that prefering sustaned fight bonus adding a support bonus, related to AV. The idea comes as follows:
Commando: General bonus > 2% damage bonus against vehicles. -Caldari > 5% bunus reduction to kick and charge time on hybrid-rail weaponry per level -Gallente > 5% bonus reduction to dispertion and reload speed on hybrid-plasma weaponry per level -Minmatar > 5% bonus to projetile clip size and +1 explosive clip size per level -Amarr > 5% bonus to heat reduction of laser weaponry per level
Assault: General Bonus > 5% to reload speed on weponry (instead of the CPU/PG reduction) -Caldari > 2% damage bunus on hybrid-rail weaponry per level -Gallente > 2% damage bonus on hybrid-plasma weaponry per level -Minmatar > 2% bonus to projetile weaponry per level -Amarr > 2% damage bonus on laser weaponry per level
Basically u can notice that bonuses could apply to light and sidearm weaponry on both cases. Also this leads to a possible food chain: Assault (better chance to deal with heavies with their damage bonus to mitigate heavies damage reduction) > Sentinel (better way to deal with scout sorprise attacks with its resistance and EHP) > Scout (better dealing with assaults low health) Then Logi and Commando would fill 2 necesary support roles, supply/repair/spawn logi and slef sufficent AV commando.
The reasoning behind this post is to try give the role assaults should have had since the beggining of uprising from my point of vew. This is considering Charlie. Please keep it constructive and sorryfor the mispelling of some words, english is not my native language.
exMAG vet.
Sver True Blood FTW.
|
Jack 3enimble
Vengeance Unbound Dark Taboo
106
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 15:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
Sounds good, although I like the CPU/PG reduction more than the reload speed tbh. With the assault changes and as a shield suit user I need all the CPU and PG I can get |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2660
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 15:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
I will cry if you take away my reload speed on Commando |
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
1787
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 15:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
Commando: ((Personal analysis from a dedicated Sentinel/Commando Player...
General bonus > 2% damage bonus against vehicles.
No. General bonus needs to be something else. Heavies already have the Sentinel and Heavy Frames to rock Forge Guns and such. Light AV weapons don't have the same kick.
-Caldari > 5% bunus reduction to kick and charge time on hybrid-rail weaponry per level
Want.
-Gallente > 5% bonus reduction to dispertion and reload speed on hybrid-plasma weaponry per level
WANT!
-Minmatar > 5% bonus to projetile clip size and +1 explosive clip size per level
More Mass Driver Shells per reload? Yes Please.
-Amarr > 5% bonus to heat reduction of laser weaponry per level.
The sound of me giggling maniacally should tell you something about my opinion here.
Anything that makes it so I put more rounds on target accurately and more rounds downrange fits MY playstyle just fine. But if this happens expect shrieking and namecalling from miscellaneous twits.
Honestly the assaults have good bonuses. the suits just aren't yet rigged to capitalize on this well yet. |
Francois Sanchez
What The French Red Whines.
44
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 16:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Personally I disagree, I'm a Minmatar commando since 1.8 release and I like the way my commando works. Moreover the damage bonus against vehicles is something I don't like, that basically forces every commandos to use their second weapon slot to fit a swarm launcher. I have a fit like that, first, I don't want to play with that all the time, I like hunting people. Moreover as a Minmando I have the 10% extra damage for swarm, and it makes it decent against dropships, but still too short against tanks.
Even if the commando keeps his nice bonuses, giving the damage bonuses to assault would kill the commandos completely. After the hotfix, assaults will be able to have more HP than commandos while using 2(or 3) damage mods, that means that you'd have an assault suit tougher, faster, with better scan abilities, better regen, and the same damage output (or even better) than the commando. |
Balamob
SVER True Blood Dark Taboo
37
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 17:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
Francois Sanchez wrote:Personally I disagree, I'm a Minmatar commando since 1.8 release and I like the way my commando works. Moreover the damage bonus against vehicles is something I don't like, that basically forces every commandos to use their second weapon slot to fit a swarm launcher. I have a fit like that, first, I don't want to play with that all the time, I like hunting people. Moreover as a Minmando I have the 10% extra damage for swarm, and it makes it decent against dropships, but still too short against tanks.
Even if the commando keeps his nice bonuses, giving the damage bonuses to assault would kill the commandos completely. After the hotfix, assaults will be able to have more HP than commandos while using 2(or 3) damage mods, that means that you'd have an assault suit tougher, faster, with better scan abilities, better regen, and the same damage output (or even better) than the commando.
A stright bonus to vehicles might be limited in some way but its a bonus agains vehicles with all your weapons, maybe adding installations can be cherry to this bonus. Also u dont have to use AV all the time, is the awesome thing of commando, they can carry 2 light weapons or sidearms in any conbination. About the assault issue, thats why i didnt consider the CPU/PG reduction as a general bonus for them so they have to choose to tank or DPS the fitting. About AVing, having 2 light weapons can mitigate the fact of using an AV weapon against infantry, thing that an assault or sentinel cant.
exMAG vet.
Sver True Blood faction FTW.
|
Nocturnal Soul
Immortal Retribution
3812
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 19:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
Noo don't you dare touch my Amarr assault
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ.
LASERS BTCH!!!!!!!
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2663
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 19:49:00 -
[8] - Quote
Actually looking over this more closely you have some good stuff.
I will say however that I think it would be wise to keep the general +5% reload speed per level of Commando, BECAUSE it boosts damages to vehicles...indirectly mind you. You basically have 2 Light AV weapons, Plasma Cannon with a magazine of 1, and Swarm Launcher with a magazine of 3. Because the magazines are so small, the primary limiting factor of their DPS is the reload speed, particularly so with the Plasma Cannon. That being said, the reload speed greatly boosts the sustained DPS of Light AV weapons already, and I think that changing that to a +2% damage per level, may actually be a bit of an uneeded nerf.
Just something to think about. |
Boot Booter
Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation
831
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 21:17:00 -
[9] - Quote
If at any point in my min assault suit, I look down and notice my SMG does not have 100 rounds in the clip, something has gone terribly wrong. This has been there since 1.0. Long before the commando was even a fetus in some ccp Devs brain.
What happened to the repair tool glow?
Why won't CCP answer?
Conspiracy?
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
12648
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 21:29:00 -
[10] - Quote
Balamob wrote:I was basically thinking to switch the damage bonus commando has to assault and vice versa (most of it). This came up with the reasoning that damage bonus is related on finishing a fight as fast as possible related to the assault fragile philosophy compared to comando which has more resilence for its passive EHP that prefering sustaned fight bonus adding a support bonus, related to AV. The idea comes as follows:
Commando: General bonus > 2% damage bonus against vehicles. -Caldari > 5% bunus reduction to kick and charge time on hybrid-rail weaponry per level -Gallente > 5% bonus reduction to dispertion and reload speed on hybrid-plasma weaponry per level -Minmatar > 5% bonus to projetile clip size and +1 explosive clip size per level -Amarr > 5% bonus to heat reduction of laser weaponry per level
Assault: General Bonus > 5% to reload speed on weponry (instead of the CPU/PG reduction) -Caldari > 2% damage bunus on hybrid-rail weaponry per level -Gallente > 2% damage bonus on hybrid-plasma weaponry per level -Minmatar > 2% bonus to projetile weaponry per level -Amarr > 2% damage bonus on laser weaponry per level
Basically u can notice that bonuses could apply to light and sidearm weaponry on both cases. Also this leads to a possible food chain: Assault (better chance to deal with heavies with their damage bonus to mitigate heavies damage reduction) > Sentinel (better way to deal with scout sorprise attacks with its resistance and EHP) > Scout (better dealing with assaults low health) Then Logi and Commando would fill 2 necesary support roles, supply/repair/spawn logi and self sufficent AV commando.
The reasoning behind this post is to try give the role assaults should have had since the beggining of uprising from my point of vew (been here since beta chromosome). This is considering Charlie. Please keep it constructive and sorry for the mispelling of some words, english is not my native language.
Why are you trying to turn Commando's in AV units? We aren't AV units...... we're suppression units...hence CCP's "Ultimate Suppression Warrior Tagline".
The only Commando's that ge bonuses to AV weapons are Gall and Min...... that a joke role bonus.
"We were commanded us to burn the system...We did. I mourn the loss of the innocent caught in our fires" -Kador Ouryon
|
|
Balamob
SVER True Blood Dark Taboo
37
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 02:01:00 -
[11] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Balamob wrote:I was basically thinking to switch the damage bonus commando has to assault and vice versa (most of it). This came up with the reasoning that damage bonus is related on finishing a fight as fast as possible related to the assault fragile philosophy compared to comando which has more resilence for its passive EHP that prefering sustaned fight bonus adding a support bonus, related to AV. The idea comes as follows:
Commando: General bonus > 2% damage bonus against vehicles. -Caldari > 5% bunus reduction to kick and charge time on hybrid-rail weaponry per level -Gallente > 5% bonus reduction to dispertion and reload speed on hybrid-plasma weaponry per level -Minmatar > 5% bonus to projetile clip size and +1 explosive clip size per level -Amarr > 5% bonus to heat reduction of laser weaponry per level
Assault: General Bonus > 5% to reload speed on weponry (instead of the CPU/PG reduction) -Caldari > 2% damage bunus on hybrid-rail weaponry per level -Gallente > 2% damage bonus on hybrid-plasma weaponry per level en Logi and Commando would fill 2 necesary support roles, supply/repair/spawn logi and self sufficent AV commando.
.................... Why are you trying to turn Commando's in AV units? We aren't AV units...... we're suppression units...hence CCP's "Ultimate Suppression Warrior Tagline". The only Commando's that ge bonuses to AV weapons are Gall and Min...... that a joke role bonus.
I know it changes the roles we use to have like commando minmatar and amarr assault, but this came up with the addition of a food chain mechanic and an overall balance for the game (in my opinion of course) cus it would give more coherence to mechanics and a more defined role for assaults/commando, of course , all this is to give an idea of how to give fulfilling roles and subject to change in order to fulfill such roles in the best of ways. About the suppression i think that should be an assault machanic but thats just me i guess.
exMAG vet.
Sver True Blood faction FTW.
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
12660
|
Posted - 2014.08.07 02:29:00 -
[12] - Quote
Balamob wrote:True Adamance wrote:Balamob wrote:I was basically thinking to switch the damage bonus commando has to assault and vice versa (most of it). This came up with the reasoning that damage bonus is related on finishing a fight as fast as possible related to the assault fragile philosophy compared to comando which has more resilence for its passive EHP that prefering sustaned fight bonus adding a support bonus, related to AV. The idea comes as follows:
Commando: General bonus > 2% damage bonus against vehicles. -Caldari > 5% bunus reduction to kick and charge time on hybrid-rail weaponry per level -Gallente > 5% bonus reduction to dispertion and reload speed on hybrid-plasma weaponry per level -Minmatar > 5% bonus to projetile clip size and +1 explosive clip size per level -Amarr > 5% bonus to heat reduction of laser weaponry per level
Assault: General Bonus > 5% to reload speed on weponry (instead of the CPU/PG reduction) -Caldari > 2% damage bunus on hybrid-rail weaponry per level -Gallente > 2% damage bonus on hybrid-plasma weaponry per level en Logi and Commando would fill 2 necesary support roles, supply/repair/spawn logi and self sufficent AV commando.
.................... Why are you trying to turn Commando's in AV units? We aren't AV units...... we're suppression units...hence CCP's "Ultimate Suppression Warrior Tagline". The only Commando's that ge bonuses to AV weapons are Gall and Min...... that a joke role bonus. I know it changes the roles we use to have like commando minmatar and amarr assault, but this came up with the addition of a food chain mechanic and an overall balance for the game (in my opinion of course) cus it would give more coherence to mechanics and a more defined role for assaults/commando, of course , all this is to give an idea of how to give fulfilling roles and subject to change in order to fulfill such roles in the best of ways. About the suppression i think that should be an assault machanic but thats just me i guess.
You know traditionally........ in the old flanking tactics military forces would be divided up into squad bearing heavier, more powerful, and suppressive weaponry ( Heavy armour, Light Machineguns/ Spears and Shields) with the intend to pin and enemy down.
A second unit it lighter equipment (skirmishing rifles/ light armour/ shortswords) would then be sent to engage the enemy from the flank in a sweeping assault.
I like the synergy of the two classes.
"We were commanded us to burn the system...We did. I mourn the loss of the innocent caught in our fires" -Kador Ouryon
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |