1. You can easily defend against ADS by carrying a swarm launcher the entire match. CCP has been generous and allowed you a sidearm to defend yourself against infantry. If you are unwilling to carry a swarm launcher the entire match, I will turn you into merc pudding with my Python. Don't blame pilots because you aren't willing to field their counter.

2. There is absolutely nothing anywhere ever saying ADS were anti-vehicle.

3. Seeing as 90% Nerf is a number pulled from the depths of your colon, I counter by saying all AV should be nerfed by 90% at the same time.

You want o be left alone by vehicles? Start carrying weapons designed to kill vehicles. It's not my fault you brought a rifle to a missile fight.

the problem with Advanced dropships, namely the assault one is its dominance on the field as most ADS pilots will just use the nose mounted gun to get safe easy kills on infantry thus not really giving much chance to mount a counter against it.
ADS were supposed to be anti vehicle anyway and the small turrets be anti inf / air support


my proposition is the ADS nose mounted gun/launcher should be -90% damage vs infantry while side small turrets remain unchanged.

even the description on the ADS's are for "aerial Engagements"


TL;DR
ADS nose turret OP vs inf, needs HEAVY nerf.

Have you ever actually tried flying one, much less trying to kill said infantry.

Have you ever actually flew one, while trying to kill infantry, as a single AV'er pounds away at your dropship.

Have you ever actually flown one to see exactly how easy it is?

No, it's very clear the most you know of them is that they fly above your head and kill you. A good pilot can be a force on the battlefield that MUST be dealt with. And no, they aren't going to give you an easy time with it. Pull out an AV weapon and make an attempt to change the status quo. Or would you rather simply fight for yourself?

On the other hand, a bad pilot is a force to be ignored, where a single AV with swarms or forge can easily give it pause, drive it away, or down the poor thing. There are FAR more bad pilots than there are good pilots.

I mean the jist here, you want them nerfed because of a "few" matches where they dominated. Should we nerf that scout and heavy that killed you over and over as well? Or the logi, because logies aren't "supposed" to kill??

1 only commandos can effectivly use swards AND still be viable vs infantry.

2 read the description noob it clearly says they are for aerial combat not mincing infantry with an OP stacked unfair advantage

3 90% nerf vs inf seems fair as it will still kill dropships lavs and havs with ease.. and untill AV is effective against vehicles like they aught to be i stand by what i believe and i believe that ADS and tanks with adv/proto gear are still far too OP in regular matchmakeing.

ADS were supposed to be anti vehicle anyway and the small turrets be anti inf / air support.

the problem with Advanced dropships, namely the assault one is its dominance on the field as most ADS pilots will just use the nose mounted gun to get safe easy kills on infantry thus not really giving much chance to mount a counter against it.
ADS were supposed to be anti vehicle anyway and the small turrets be anti inf / air support


my proposition is the ADS nose mounted gun/launcher should be -90% damage vs infantry while side small turrets remain unchanged.

even the description on the ADS's are for "aerial Engagements"


TL;DR
ADS nose turret OP vs inf, needs HEAVY nerf.

and no with a good pilot they are unstopable, with a regular pilot they are still very strong..