|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Buwaro Draemon
WarRavens
Final Resolution.
266
   |
Posted - 2014.07.29 04:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
Along side with the modules you guys took out.
With AV and vehicles being the way they are now. it wouldn't hurt the least.
I miss seing the Logistics Dropship being able to provide a mobile spawn point for friendlies while still being able to tank out SOME damage.
While some changes can be done to the Logistics vehicles. Like being able to provide mobile battlefield munition at a limited level. Scout LAVs function grate for fast escapes and the Enforcer HAVs... well they were special.
I also miss:
the Damage control units
Damage Energizers
Active repairs (SO much better than the passive repairs we have now IMO)
The modules that let you sacrifice armor for better speed (I forgot their name)
The spooling modules. (If you weren't a tanker before 1.7) They reduced the spooling time of the vechile's turret.
But all that gave Vehicles a large diversity. And truly, I almost never saw any vehicle QQ before 1.7 launched. The only thing that was needed to be added was turret ammo and the turret ammo expansion modules with a slight nerf to AV (reducing missile lock time and range while increasing Forge Gun's charge up time and decreasing a little it's damage) Would have done fine.
There was no need to re-work the entire vehicles. Take out the specialized versions of each vehicle (except ADS) and then abandon Dust and leave us with the Standard vehicles and in a huge battle between AV vs Vehicle
If you are a scout and you only use EWAR then you have my salutes o7
END THE TYRANNY OF BRINK TANKED SCOUTS
|
Buwaro Draemon
WarRavens
Final Resolution.
266
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 06:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
emm kay wrote:SCATTORSHOT RINNEGATE wrote:This is a Cool idea but before doing this we must concentrate a little bit in AV weapons and tankvtank maybe rattati will hold some variants one day but when is the right moment. Be patient. What aspect of av needs to be changed? This morning i spent 100k on equipment to destroy 2 tanks (soma, madrugar) and a mlt dropship. So there's the fact that it's overpowered.
I can easily down any tank (if they don't run away and they all do but I always chase them) with my Wyirkomis and my ADV Minimando. And the only Dropships I have a problem taking down are the Assault ones. But that's why I have a Incubus with a railgun on it. It sends them flying away.
If you are a scout and you only use EWAR then you have my salutes o7
END THE TYRANNY OF BRINK TANKED SCOUTS
|
Buwaro Draemon
WarRavens
Final Resolution.
267
|
Posted - 2014.07.29 15:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:SCATTORSHOT RINNEGATE wrote:This is a Cool idea but before doing this we must concentrate a little bit in AV weapons and tankvtank maybe rattati will hold some variants one day but when is the right moment. Be patient. Been patient since the Tankpocalypse of 1.6 and I was patient even before that for my ******* amarrian HAV. I'm done being patient with CCP.
I wasn't here for 1.6. I thought that the Tankpocalypse happened on 1.7.
But yeah. If we aren't getting pur racial vehicles any time soon on Dust 514. At least give us the vehicle diversity we had before 1.7
If you are a scout and you only use EWAR then you have my salutes o7
END THE TYRANNY OF BRINK TANKED SCOUTS
|
Buwaro Draemon
WarRavens
Final Resolution.
268
|
Posted - 2014.07.30 01:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
SCATTORSHOT RINNEGATE wrote:Alright then poke a dev to bring his attention if you are sure that is ok, good for me too.
I just want a devs opinion on this
If you are a scout and you only use EWAR then you have my salutes o7
END THE TYRANNY OF BRINK TANKED SCOUTS
|
|
|
| |
|