|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2298
   |
Posted - 2014.07.11 21:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why would Dust be better on XBox?
Like my ideas?
Pokey Dravon for CPM1
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2298
|
Posted - 2014.07.11 21:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
People buy into the hype that XBox or PS3 is inherently better, despite the systems having similar specs. Cross platform games are often designed on one console and them ported to the other, the port typically being less optimized which is why some games look better on PS and some look better on XBox.
It does not mean however that one system is better than the other, and thus Dust would not necessarily be better on one vs the other.
Like my ideas?
Pokey Dravon for CPM1
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2298
|
Posted - 2014.07.11 22:07:00 -
[3] - Quote
Doctor Day wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:People buy into the hype that XBox or PS3 is inherently better, despite the systems having similar specs. Cross platform games are often designed on one console and them ported to the other, the port typically being less optimized which is why some games look better on PS and some look better on XBox.
It does not mean however that one system is better than the other, and thus Dust would not necessarily be better on one vs the other. This is convo has nothing to do with xbox stop hidding the fact that your gal scout needs a armor nerf!
Lol wut? The only time I run GalScouts now is a Dragonfly BPO when I do initial spawn and sprint to hack the near objective. You know what I fit it with? 2 KinCats, a Cardiac Regulator, and a Flaylock. If you really think a standard scout with no SP spent on it and no armor plates is OP, I think you may need to reconsider your playstyle.
Do try to avoid making wild accusations without anything to back them up.
Like my ideas?
Pokey Dravon for CPM1
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2298
|
Posted - 2014.07.11 22:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
Doctor Day wrote:
nununununununu i never said a std scout with no sp spent on it is op but a Gal scout with 700 Armor platers & proto ar that can strafe like it has no plates is op
Well then when you say "your Gallente Scout" implying that I'm somehow defending the suit because I use some OP fit, and I don't actually USE a Gallente Scout for more than movement, you really don't know what you're talking about. Notice I never disagreed with your initial statement, it's a known complaint that has been mirrored many times in countless thread.
I was however inquiring about your logic in stating that the game would be better on Xbox, since I obviously don't understand your reasoning and was curious as to why you thought that.
Like my ideas?
Pokey Dravon for CPM1
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2298
|
Posted - 2014.07.11 22:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
Bethhy wrote:Doctor Day wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:People buy into the hype that XBox or PS3 is inherently better, despite the systems having similar specs. Cross platform games are often designed on one console and them ported to the other, the port typically being less optimized which is why some games look better on PS and some look better on XBox.
It does not mean however that one system is better than the other, and thus Dust would not necessarily be better on one vs the other. This is convo has nothing to do with xbox stop hidding the fact that your gal scout needs a armor nerf! Most armor any competent Gallente scout you'll face will have is around 350-390. 180-200 shield. around the max health you would run with mas skills and fittings.. Anything more and you give up any advantage you have as a scout to try and pretend to be something that is better at that role then you. *Pro-tip* The scouts that are hard to kill aren't the slow armored up ones.
Its true, when I run Caldari Scout I dont use any shield extenders or armor plates, its 100% EWAR.
Like my ideas?
Pokey Dravon for CPM1
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2298
|
Posted - 2014.07.11 22:17:00 -
[6] - Quote
Doctor Day wrote:
I never said you used a op fit.
You said I was "hiding the fact that [my] GalScout needs an armor nerf" implying I'm using a GalScout and using armor, which I don't. Are we done here?
Like my ideas?
Pokey Dravon for CPM1
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2298
|
Posted - 2014.07.11 22:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
Bethhy wrote:
people must love you in their squads ;)
Well to be honest I don't really do it a lot anymore, it got kinda boring. Mostly running Galmmando with full reps, AR and Plasma Cannon. People like me in their squad for the entertainment at that point. 
Like my ideas?
Pokey Dravon for CPM1
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2298
|
Posted - 2014.07.11 22:20:00 -
[8] - Quote
Doctor Day wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:Doctor Day wrote:
I never said you used a op fit.
You said I was "hiding the fact that [my] GalScout needs an armor nerf" implying I'm using a GalScout and using armor, which I don't. Are we done here? EDIT: And I am still curious about your reasoning behind your XBox comment. No hostility intended. I never put anywhere in my sentence that "you used a op fit"
Looks like I'm not gonna get an answer about the Xbox huh? 
Like my ideas?
Pokey Dravon for CPM1
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2299
|
Posted - 2014.07.11 23:05:00 -
[9] - Quote
Forlorn Destrier wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:Doctor Day wrote:
I never said you used a op fit.
You said I was "hiding the fact that [my] GalScout needs an armor nerf" implying I'm using a GalScout and using armor, which I don't. Are we done here? EDIT: And I am still curious about your reasoning behind your XBox comment. No hostility intended. The fact that you had to add the "my" to his statement clearly shows you inferred something; he didn't imply it.
Doctor Day wrote:
This is convo has nothing to do with xbox stop hidding the fact that your gal scout needs a armor nerf!
Given the structure of the sentence, a direct quote would make the word "your" not make sense, hence the annotation in brackets [my] to clarify. It's quite common in writing when direct quotes are used but need to be annotated in order to clarify the context. Typically brackets are used to show that the change is not part of the original quote but rather a means to make it fit the structure of the sentence in which the quote is being used.
Like my ideas?
Pokey Dravon for CPM1
|
|
|
| |
|