|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1510
|
Posted - 2014.07.10 00:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:An idea I had was to show LP standings as a forum tag. If anyone is interested in helping me make a cool lore case, please reply to this thread like this:
How would this look if I had standings with multiple groups? Could I be an Imperial Templar and a Corporate Wage Slave?
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1572
|
Posted - 2014.08.02 21:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:I see the caldari as the imperialistic era of Japan if that helps :|
No way. The caldari are hyper-capitalists with a side of facism. Think Ron Paul's wet dream (Libertarianism for the non-americans). I think names based upon something from Mussolini era Italy or Franco era Spain would be more fitting.
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1573
|
Posted - 2014.08.02 21:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:Mobius Kaethis wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:I see the caldari as the imperialistic era of Japan if that helps :| No way. The caldari are hyper-capitalists with a side of facism. Think Ron Paul's wet dream (Libertarianism for the non-americans). I think names based upon something from Mussolini era Italy or Franco era Spain would be more fitting. You greatly misunderstand the caldari if that's all you think there is to them. You're so wrong it isn't even funny.
What more is there to understand Mina they are an extremely nationalistic corporatocracy with militaristic tendencies. Japan, prior to the post WWII reconstruction era was a feudal dictatorship with zero independent capitalism on a major scale, a fact dictated by the Japanese cast system, which at the time placed merchants right above the untouchable classes that worked with tanning hides and waste disposal. The caldari are ruled by a governing group of corporations. There were no corporations in premodern Japan. The closest you are going to get were the Dutch traders who were only allowed in a single port city (Nagasaki) and were an extremely small influence on the coutnry as a whole due to the Shogunate's policies.
Frano's Spain or Mussollini's Italy are much more closely related to the portrayal of the Caldari since they were 1) capitalisitc facist states where the goverment was essentially run by a leader who was in bed with the corporate powers. 2) They were highly militaristic emphasizing exactly the same kinds of martial ideas espoused by the Caldari.
Additionally have you even looked at the Caldari character models in EvE? The are for the most part European, with very few features of Asiatic peoples.
The issue doesn't seem to be that I don't understand Japan or the Caldari, its that you have no clue what you are talking about. Your dime store understanding of Japanese history really isn't enough to make a cross cultural comparison with Bugs Bunny let alone a fictions society with the same depth of background as the Caldari.
Consider your self "historianed." <--its like being "lawyered but way less applicable to daily life and really only something actual historians can pull off.
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1574
|
Posted - 2014.08.02 22:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sgt Kirk wrote:
Well I was cautioned by Arkena to be nice to the people in this thread but I'll throw that **** to the wind now.
Mobius is pretty spot on. Like I said before, there's more to look at than one tiny factor of the empires. You're going to have to know a little bit of history both real world history and New Eden Lore to properly have a grasp at what's going on.
Arkena, do I have permission to stop playing nice now?
Take off the gloves brother, it is time to kick some conceptual ass.
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1582
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 05:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:I suspect I have more knowledge of the Japanese culture than you might.
I don't have more time to actually properly dismiss this right now, but I'll see about getting around to it.
I have a degree in Japanese history, do you? I also lived there for years and speak Japanese without needing to use google translate. Can you say the same?
püépü¬püƒpéépüépü«püôpü¿pü+F¬¦pü¢péïn+ƒsñºTÿ¬s+üpéén+ƒS+òtùöpéäpü¡péôsÅ»µä¢püäpü¥püån+ƒ
Watching manga doesn't make you an expert girl, go pick a fight with someone else.
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1582
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 06:05:00 -
[6] - Quote
Proposed Caldari Ranks by faction warfare level: 1) Camicia Nera 2) Capo Squadra 3) Aiutante 4) Sottocapomanipolo 5) Centurione 6) Seniore 7) Primo Senior 8) Console Comandante 9) Luogotenente Generale 10) Comandante Generale
These are based upon the ranks used by the "Black Shirts" who were the Facist Miliia of Franco era Spain. While they are simple ranks I feel like the italian terminology and clear connection to the terms use for ranks in Ancient Rome gives it a bit of interesting flare.
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1583
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 08:10:00 -
[7] - Quote
Malleus Malificorum wrote: It's incongruous to the point of being jarring when you try to toss out Italian names for a race that has zero connection to anything Italian
Ahh, you will notice that I crossed out my suggestion as I like another much better. I have looked over the naming conventions you have referenced and I will concede that you are correct. Japanese names are almost always used for EvE NPC ships and it would be jarring to break with that tradition for ship naming.
I'm still not sold on it for the FW ranks though. You'll notice that EvE's Caldari FW ranks totally stay away from any ethnicity which means your assertion that Japanese names "are appropriate and to the point accurate" names for fw ranks is not correct. To keep with your ideal of a non-jarring EvE aligned set of FW names (an idea I fully support by the way) the FW ranks on dust should also avoid Asian/European specific titles or themes.
Instead, our names should be sticking to the backbone of Caldari ideals: capitalism, corporatocracy, and militaristic nationalism. This could make for a far more interesting naming scheme that avoids both the military ranks you find "bland" and the Japanese theme that doesn't fit the Cal FW ranks and is far too pass+¬. Corporate titles meets something more aggressive perhaps? I feel like "corporate head hunter" could fit in there somewhere .
Please note I crossed out my suggestion almost as soon as I made it. I like it to be honest (it might offend Spanish people who's families were the targets of the "Black Shirts" but left it there to stir the pot. Glad it worked.
Just so you know I play a Minmatar EvE side and have zero interaction with Caldari NPC ships. Thus my former ignorance of the naming schemes they used. Thank you for the info.
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1592
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 23:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
I must say, contrary to my previous crossed out post I am souring on the whole idea of FW ranks being in other languages. While it does lend a diversity to the titles it doesn't really convey the races' values.
I like the idea of the Amarran FW ranks being based on something "Crusades" esque as it fits their whole religious zealot backstory. junni jones's ideas are good with the exception of rank 10 which I would prefer to see switched with "Inquisitor" or the like since it keeps more with the overall theme he developed in the list.
junni jones wrote: 10: Monster O God *hellsing reference* 9: Templar 8: Paladin 7: Holy Knight 6: Saint 5: Missionaries 4: Under Marshal 3: Sergeant Brothers 2: Turcopoles 1: Standard Bearer
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1596
|
Posted - 2014.08.04 14:12:00 -
[9] - Quote
True Adamance wrote: 1.) Initiate/ Acolyte 2.) Paladin 3.) Exalted Paladin 4.) Templar 5.) Templar Lieutenant 6.) Legate 7.) Imperial Inquisitor 8.) Imperator Cardinal 9.) Ecclesiarch 10.) Divine Captain of the Imperial Guard or Scutariorum Imperatrix
Now this is the best Amarr list so far. Interesting with a militiary/religious bent, and most importantly, not trying so hard. Honestly the simplicity makes the ranks sound nice.
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1601
|
Posted - 2014.08.05 06:26:00 -
[10] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:And yet I point you to galm fae's post about language.
MINA,
I hate to break it to you but I find that all the lists in other languages, especially my own, are trying far too hard. They may indeed have some connection to EvE lore and I think it is great that you are working so hard on them (by you I mean all of the people who are involved in them), unfortunately they just aren't as good as the lists that use English terms and link with the more general themes relevant to the race in question.
True's list is perfect evidence of this. Sure, you could do days of research and come up with a list in Ancient Aramaic that is drawing from language used in the Dead Sea Scrolls and linked with 8 seperate pieces of erata that you have read about the Amarr. You could do that and it would be conceptually impressive, but it would also be a waste of time. No one but you and the other people who helped you with said list would really understand what it means or its relevance. Not only will they not understand but they won't care. The words, because they are in another language will have no relevance to the players.
While you might be thinking well then those players are stupid, which, to be honest, is probably how I would react as well if I had worked really hard on something. The larger problem is that because most players don't understand your list they also won't care about the titles. Earning ranks will not be a motivating factor since no one will be impressed by them bragging that they are rank "0wyrs0."
TL;DR Lists in other languages mean nothing to the vast majority of the playerbase and therefore should not be used to rank FW participants. FW ranks should be in English and loosely based upon the respective race's core background. Dust players with other languages set as the game's main language should get similar primary language preference.
Fun > Realism
|
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1602
|
Posted - 2014.08.05 07:49:00 -
[11] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:Mobius Kaethis wrote: TL;DR Lists in other languages mean nothing to the vast majority of the playerbase and therefore should not be used to rank FW participants. FW ranks should be in English and loosely based upon the respective race's core background. Dust players with other languages set as the game's main language should get similar primary language preference.
Cool opinion bud. It's nice to see you step away from being overwhelmingly condescending and insulting for a minute, to simply being mildly condescending. You aren't the only source of feedback that the names have been presented to, the vast majority have reacted very positively towards it especially when given a side by side comparison and a little bit more explanation. You're entitled to your opinion, but it isn't an objective fact.
I knew you would be hurt and react in accorance with that feeling but you really need to take a step back and do some really deep thinking about what your proposing and how it will be accepted by the entire community not just the 10 or so people actively participating in this thread.
Also, while you may have taken my tone to be condescending that really is you reading too much into it. I was actually trying to be respectful of your work and opinion while at the same time pointing out a major issue.
It is sad that you reacted exactly as I thought you might. I hoped for more.
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1602
|
Posted - 2014.08.05 08:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote: I have little inclination to believe you're not being 'condescending' when you enter a discussion flinging insults and attacks on the character of others ('dime store understanding'). Things like that flavor whole conversations.
I've actually gone through three stages of feeling with regards to you and this particular thread. First I was really annoyed when I wrongly percieved you to be trying to turn us into "space ninjas." I really hate the idea of dust being full of space ninjas. As a result I loaded up my vitriolic cannons and let loose a volley or two. After I learned that you were really trying to make your concepts fit the lore I was dispassionately interested. Finally after a lot of thought I have become brightened by your spirit but totally disinterested in your end-product.
Your reaction was fair given my initial attack but I was truly trying to be productive and respectful with the last few posts.
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1613
|
Posted - 2014.08.05 23:49:00 -
[13] - Quote
Malleus Malificorum wrote: "Dumb it down, I don't think the people who have no knowledge of anything lore related would understand" - this isn't really a valid position because it's really being used to prop up an argument from ignorance, it's essentially saying "I don't understand it, so I don't like it, instead lets use names that aren't accurate because they have less of a burden of knowledge". Force feed people the lore, give them the titles they may not necessarily understand at first and maybe they'll do a little bit of research and go 'wow! this is really cool, it really expands my understanding of [faction]'.
I think you are vastly over estimating the willingness of the Dust player base to get onto a computer and put time into researching Dust related lore. Sure, I'm sure that there are a few members of our community who would be spurred into reading the mythos of the EvE universe. Unfortunately I really think that the majority of players just aren't going to care enough to invest the energy. Remember you're talking about a small player base of console players, many of whom have zero connection to EvE beyond what Dust provides.
Many of these players have told me repeatedly that they have no interest in deepening their gaming experience by getting into EvE or even learning more about the EvE lore. They want it simple. They want something connected to the easily digestible elements of the races background which they have gleaned from character creation and have little to no interest beyond that.
It is not that Kirk and I are dumbing anything down or even supporting their ignorance. The ranking systems we want to present need to be perfectly accurate to their races. No, what we are looking for is something that is readily understandable. Ranks in other languages are simply too obtuse to catch most players interest. They will look at those unintelligible words and simply not care at all about what it says leaving them unmotivated to strive for a higher rank.
True's list, which has a strong connection to the Amarran back story and theme is clear, interesting, and has a lot of cool sounding titles. That is what is going to push players towards participation. Bragging and showing off their e-peen through their ranks. Put yourself in their shoes. To a person who hasn't done the translation work which is going to sound cooler: High inquisitor, or +Æ+æ+ò+ö +ö+É+Ö+á+º+ò+ò+Ö+û+Ö+ÿ+ò+¿ (I can't romanize it because my hebrew is rusty and google translate doesn't use vowels. Darn my lack of practice). One sounds like some bad-ass evil priest, the other is totally meaningless.
I'm starting to ramble, but the point is these lists need to be in English, linked to the race in questions culture backbone, and sound aggressive as well as cool.
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1613
|
Posted - 2014.08.05 23:58:00 -
[14] - Quote
Galm Fae wrote:John Demonsbane wrote:Sad. This thread has managed to suck out any joy the original idea had given me. Wouldn't be the first time the "average playerbase" around here has managed to ruin a good idea. If anyone has any doubt that CCP will ere on the side of lore rather than what passes for 'average' for you lot, look at the Chronicles. Read some of the books. If nothing else, just take a good, hard look at New Eden. There is a reason systems aren't named "Swirly Planet Place" and why ships aren't called "Shoot boat things." Maybe it doesn't occur to any of you because you lack any amount of creative thinking, but when you are building a deep and diverse world like New Eden good enough just isn't good enough.
Take a look at EvE's faction warfare ranks and you will see what Kirk and I are talking about. We aren't proposing that all the ranks be stupid, which is what you seem to be getting from our comments, but we are saying they shouldn't sound like their authors' are those jerks are renaissance festivals that yell at people because the stitching on their breeches isn't "period correct."
Remember what CCP sells is fiction and one of the coolest things about a fictional universe is that whatever flight of fancy its author conceives of becomes the game's reality. Whatever they say will be the lore, and it doesn't need to be as deep or as complicated as you would have us believe.
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1617
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 03:12:00 -
[15] - Quote
Malleus Malificorum wrote:Might I suggest you stop making logical fallacies like Reductio ad Absurdum (your Hebrew example) the lists have been presented in 'english', though they may not be words that you're familiar with. Among the other logical fallacies you're making is 'argumentum ad populum' with wonderful things like "well most dust players don't care about this!", if they 'don't care' why are you considering their opinion? Remember, these are supposed to be forum titles (though who knows, maybe one day they'll show up in legion) and they'll likely have an option to be disabled, if you never go on the forums it doesn't affect you and thus it shouldn't be pandering to you. If you have no interest in the Lore why should we pander to you with stale titles or things that might be 'technically' accurate, but not as accurate as other more involved looks? Your 'points' are riddled with logical fallacies (strawman's, special pleading, ad hominem and more) and they have been since you showed up and started insulting the hard work of others when you didn't have a damn clue what you yourself were talking about. You've expressed your opinion multiple times and I'm sure it'll be taken into consideration, but you've also severely dragged the level of this discussion down with your ignorance. At this point all we're doing is going around in circles.
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is? I get the impression that you've simply looked up the largest words you've heard and are repeating them random sequences. All of my points are perfectly logical. 1) Most people who play dust aren't interested in the lore to the extent that you are. 2) The level your taking it to destroys the value of it for the majority of the player base. 3) CCP should be appealing to the largest contingent of the player community it can. 4) You are not representative of that community and thus need to shut the **** up.
On a very specific note if you actually took the time to read my post you would have noticed that I said I could not romanize the hebrew and that I realized if it were in one of your lists it would have been romanized. Romanization, in case you don't know (since you seem like you're really a complete fool) is the process of writing a word from another language using the latin alphabet (our alphabet). Now clearly I did not do this and appologized for it in the post. Using that as a criticism of my argument is not only stupid but totally inaccurate.
Malleus Malificorum wrote: why should we pander to you with stale titles or things that might be 'technically' accurate, but not as accurate as other more involved looks?
What the **** does this even mean? Could you at least try and make sense?
Malleus Malificorum wrote: You've expressed your opinion multiple times and I'm sure it'll be taken into consideration, but you've also severely dragged the level of this discussion down with your ignorance. At this point all we're doing is going around in circles.
You've neck-bearded around for 11 pages and totally failed at creating something that will inspire the majority of the payer base. When someone contradicts you, you try and bully them into submission. We've heard enough of your lame ass **** so shut the **** up and let the adults talk.
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1626
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 03:44:00 -
[16] - Quote
Galm Fae wrote:Mobius Kaethis basically wrote: No u m8.
-É -+-â, -ç-+-¦-+--¦-Ç-+-¦-+ -+ -¦ -¦-¦-+-¦-+. Seriously, I could cite you the several posts before you showed up where we were being fairly productive as a community, the several posts afterwards where we refuted every one of your points, or the several evelopedia posts that support our choices... But you seem beyond that point. And by the way, if you haven't figured it out yet Mina is Longstride's alt. You know, the guy running for CPM? Literally the community representative and my personal vote? I'm pretty sure saying he doesn't represent the DUST community is a hopeless argument.
Who cares? We've had people I disagreed with on the CPM before and we will again. I made my piece with longstride posts ago. You two assholes are the only ones who keep flaunting your epeens about asking me to kick them.
You refuted my points by saying the Japanese language was a fine use for FW ranks based upon NPC ship names. Might I point out that EvE FW ranks are much more closely related to what we are looking for here. Why would be base a naming convention off of NPC names rather than something given to PC. I really don't think you fully refuted my argument given that did you?
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1626
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 04:16:00 -
[17] - Quote
Malleus Malificorum wrote: Why should they pander to a disinterested playerbase...On what grounds do you think that you have the authority to tell anyone that their ideas shouldn't stand on their own merit because they "don't represent the terribly disinterested community"?
Pandering is what game companies do. It is how they make money and draw in players. Are you saying the game would be better off if it ignored the majority of its player base.
I don't have any more authority than you and of course some of what I have said is opinion. Some of what you have said is opinion too. That is how people argue. As far as the basis for my opinion is concerned I have based it upon numerous conversations with other people, where they have expressed their opinions to me. I have also observed how other people have reacted in this thread. While three of you have really like the ideas you have been sharing the vast majority of players have made proposals more in line with what I am calling for. Since you have not payed attention to the rest of the posters your ideas clearly aren't representing the group. Mind you I'm not saying my ideas are a prefect representation of the group's ideals either.
Malleus Malificorum wrote:I don't think they should pander to people who clearly don't really care, there's no point in focusing on a lost cause.
That is very cynical of you. Don't you think that by appealing to the larger audience CCP could actually bring people back to the game. If you don't have hope that CCP can win people back over with an appealing product then why even post here atl all. Shouldn't you just give up on this game and go somewhere else.
Malleus Malificorum wrote:Here, I think you need this
Once again I am not nor will I ever be a wholly factually person. Argument without opinion isn't argument at all. It is simply statement. I assumed that you were smart enough to understand that people actually use opinions constantly. In fact you saying that I don't understand the difference between fact and opinion is, in fact, an opinion.
Malleus Malificorum wrote:started slinging mud because *gasp* you thought you might have found a weaboo on the internet! Darn right I did and I stand by my decision too. No space ninjas in dust ever! You'll notice that my decision has been supported by people.
Malleus Malificorum wrote: I don't think I'm going to respond to anything else you have to say. You've derailed this completely and the constant arguing because of it has sucked the enjoyment out of the idea for practically everyone, thanks for that.
You're welcome!
Fun > Realism
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1627
|
Posted - 2014.08.06 04:32:00 -
[18] - Quote
Malleus Malificorum wrote:I've replaced a word in this next quote just to demonstrate how silly your argument is. Mobius Kaethis wrote: 1) Most people who play eve aren't interested in the lore to the extent that you are.
And yet we still have all the amazing lore and backstory that bubbles to the surface, to those that aren't interested the bhaalgorn is just another shiptype and the state shokuro buke is just another NPC, wormhole space and incursions are just another place to try to make money, but for people that actually are interested in the lore it can mean a lot and presents a wonderfully rich universe to explore.
It seems like you're supporting my idea here bud. You should have your lore. It should be there for you to enjoy. I never said it should go away. What I am saying though is that the titles we are talking about should be more accessible. Not devoid of lore but part of the more accessible elements of the lore. The names of the ships are accessible since players can link them to mythological creatures, or words that evoke emotions. You enjoy them at a deeper level which is great too. The rank lists we make need to have that same level of accessibility. Thank you for supporting my point.
Fun > Realism
|
|
|
|