Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Larry Desmo
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 18:24:00 -
[1] - Quote
why do round based battles still exist in this game as the main game modes? what hapened to the open sandbox districes numbering in the thousands or tens of thousands? why dont security levels matter in dust, it woud go a long way to fix the npe if we had the districts open to anyone and eveyone up to a certain number aloud actually on the districts. the districts could be kinda like individual rooms that spawn pve drones and take time to clear them out and cleared districts coud have about a week long cooldown timer before drones begin to show up again alowing resource production to resume for the corporations that hold them.
In high security space districts are owned by npc corporations so clearing an infested district for them could net a small bounty per drone remved and a small standing boost with the corisponding corporation, friendly fire would be disabled or severly punished resulting in standing lossand possible expulsion from the districts owned by the corisponding corporations where friendly fire has taken place. the risks here would be low and it would be a safe haven for new players to learn the jist of the game pvp would not be occurring in high security space districts
In low security space districts could work almost exactly the same way except with more risk of pvp and little to no consequence , drone bounties could be higher and odds of salvage could also be higher.
In null sec would be a completly lawless zone where the players make up the laws as they go just lime in eve, im sure you ccp guys can come up with more .
if we could just get a sandbox based high security areas first you would see an exlosion in new player retention, the round based battles were ok for beta testing equipment suits and weapons but it dosnt do justice to the true scope of this game, round based battles should only exist in new eden as a wager battle system where participants wager isk on their team and friends and the winners take all even non participants should be aloud to bet on the winner and possibly make iskif they picked the right team. |
boba's fetta
Dead Man's Game Dark Taboo
724
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 18:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
because we arnt getting anything new again....
|
P14GU3
The Southern Legion Final Resolution.
782
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 18:33:00 -
[3] - Quote
Dead game is dead. CCP says buy a computer and play legion...
I only play dust514ums now. It was always more fun than the actual game anyways.
|
Larry Desmo
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 18:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
P14GU3 wrote:Dead game is dead. CCP says buy a computer and play legion... why the hell would they do that, they have a badass game framework already buid all they have to do is iterate on it more, if they actually tried to retain new players they would be making a shitload of money not to mention a lot of peope happy too. |
Seymour KrelbornX
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
407
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 20:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
Larry Desmo wrote:why do round based battles still exist in this game as the main game modes? what hapened to the open sandbox districes numbering in the thousands or tens of thousands? why dont security levels matter in dust, it woud go a long way to fix the npe if we had the districts open to anyone and eveyone up to a certain number aloud actually on the districts. the districts could be kinda like individual rooms that spawn pve drones and take time to clear them out and cleared districts coud have about a week long cooldown timer before drones begin to show up again alowing resource production to resume for the corporations that hold them.
In high security space districts are owned by npc corporations so clearing an infested district for them could net a small bounty per drone remved and a small standing boost with the corisponding corporation, friendly fire would be disabled or severly punished resulting in standing lossand possible expulsion from the districts owned by the corisponding corporations where friendly fire has taken place. the risks here would be low and it would be a safe haven for new players to learn the jist of the game pvp would not be occurring in high security space districts
In low security space districts could work almost exactly the same way except with more risk of pvp and little to no consequence , drone bounties could be higher and odds of salvage could also be higher.
In null sec would be a completly lawless zone where the players make up the laws as they go just lime in eve, im sure you ccp guys can come up with more .
if we could just get a sandbox based high security areas first you would see an exlosion in new player retention, the round based battles were ok for beta testing equipment suits and weapons but it dosnt do justice to the true scope of this game, round based battles should only exist in new eden as a wager battle system where participants wager isk on their team and friends and the winners take all even non participants should be aloud to bet on the winner and possibly make iskif they picked the right team.
you didn't hear? dust has been abandoned and soon cancled... for legion, the new dust exclusive to computer.... |
Larry Desmo
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 21:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
no thats the dumbest thing i ever heard, i qut playing about a month after lauch because the proto stomp meat grinder round based battle system suks. this game is supposed to be a sandbox with 10 years or more of continued development, wtf happened to that? round based battles are not the way to present this game, it dosnt do the freedom new eden represents justice. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |