Anarchide didn't even bother to tell anyone anything about himself, or why he wanted to run. Why should I vote for people who don't even want to put any effort in.

My voting went primarily towards those who had experience, didn't have any agendas, understood the role, and seemed committed to the health of the game, and in that Judge Rhadamanthus came out on top with a rather impressive resume of experience and clear impartiality (even though he has an 'edge' and is willing to tell people to **** off). I truly hope he wins.

My second choice in experience went to Iron Wolf Saber, because despite him occasionally being a frustrating individual to talk to or read post - *he is already doing the job* - and he is frank and honest. I'd love to see him back on the CPM simply due to being accessible to the community and experienced.

Aeon Amadi got my third vote, he has some experience with game design and he *really* wants to push for an ISD system that I feel this game needs. He's realistic, willing to look for problems and bring them to attention.

There are a lot of strong candidates out there, and a whole lot of reasons to vote for them. Good luck to the participants who actually put in the effort to tell us about themselves and why they want to be a CPM.

Do you think acting like CCP have until very recently will get you votes? Communication is the principal reason for CPM.

You must be a troll