| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
anaboop
Dem Durrty Boyz
General Tso's Alliance
114
   |
Posted - 2014.07.04 11:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
Cause lets face it vehicles hate AV and REs.
More practice against other vehicles, would be nice.
Seriously though, need more vehicle vs vehicle only battles.
Could even break it down to lav vs lav, hav vs hav, ds vs ds
Fully sick Anaboop trading card
|
Seymour KrelbornX
Holdfast Syndicate
Amarr Empire
292
|
Posted - 2014.07.04 11:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
anaboop wrote:Cause lets face it vehicles hate AV and REs.
More practice against other vehicles, would be nice.
Seriously though, need more vehicle vs vehicle only battles.
Could even break it down to lav vs lav, hav vs hav, ds vs ds
so how would we stop infantry from being in these matches since we have to call in vehicles to begin with once we spawn?
would our suits just not work? |
Lorhak Gannarsein
Legio DXIV
4007
|
Posted - 2014.07.04 15:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
Seymour KrelbornX wrote:anaboop wrote:Cause lets face it vehicles hate AV and REs.
More practice against other vehicles, would be nice.
Seriously though, need more vehicle vs vehicle only battles.
Could even break it down to lav vs lav, hav vs hav, ds vs ds so how would we stop infantry from being in these matches since we have to call in vehicles to begin with once we spawn? would our suits just not work?
Your rifle is broken and your arms are tied together.
GG call in a tank or feed.
CCP Rattati Best Dev
AmLogi 5 GÇó AmAss 5 GÇó AmSent 4 GÇó CalScout 5
CalLogi, you're next!
|
anaboop
Dem Durrty Boyz
General Tso's Alliance
116
|
Posted - 2014.07.04 22:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Seymour KrelbornX wrote:anaboop wrote:Cause lets face it vehicles hate AV and REs.
More practice against other vehicles, would be nice.
Seriously though, need more vehicle vs vehicle only battles.
Could even break it down to lav vs lav, hav vs hav, ds vs ds so how would we stop infantry from being in these matches since we have to call in vehicles to begin with once we spawn? would our suits just not work?
Remove all ammo for everything on dropsuits, so ur unable to shoot deploy equipment etc. Forced to call in vehicle.
Fully sick Anaboop trading card
|
Seymour KrelbornX
Holdfast Syndicate
Amarr Empire
357
|
Posted - 2014.07.06 20:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
anaboop wrote:Seymour KrelbornX wrote:anaboop wrote:Cause lets face it vehicles hate AV and REs.
More practice against other vehicles, would be nice.
Seriously though, need more vehicle vs vehicle only battles.
Could even break it down to lav vs lav, hav vs hav, ds vs ds so how would we stop infantry from being in these matches since we have to call in vehicles to begin with once we spawn? would our suits just not work? Remove all ammo for everything on dropsuits, so ur unable to shoot deploy equipment etc. Forced to call in vehicle.
seems a thin premise that hired mercenaries would enter a battle field without ammo....
|
anaboop
Dem Durrty Boyz
General Tso's Alliance
116
|
Posted - 2014.07.06 23:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
no ammo or equipment, except for large and small turrents seperate spawns on big map.
No CRU, no Supply depot, No installation, pure vehicle vs vehicle.
Would need a big redline so u cant have your vehicle shot down before deploying.
Run out of ammo, goto redline call in another vehicle and recall old one.
Fully sick Anaboop trading card
|
SCATTORSHOT RINNEGATE
A.P.E.X BRUTE FORCE
124
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 09:07:00 -
[7] - Quote
Without the variants we are doomed
War Is Just Routine - Snake
|
TheEnd762
SVER True Blood
Dark Taboo
528
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 09:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
anaboop wrote:Remove all ammo for everything on dropsuits, so ur unable to shoot deploy equipment etc. Forced to call in vehicle.
What about melee? |
anaboop
Dem Durrty Boyz
General Tso's Alliance
116
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 10:16:00 -
[9] - Quote
TheEnd762 wrote:anaboop wrote:Remove all ammo for everything on dropsuits, so ur unable to shoot deploy equipment etc. Forced to call in vehicle. What about melee?
Trivial
If you think you can outrun the vehicles survive the enemy redline to melee someone, I dub you Sir Trivial Noob.
Fully sick Anaboop trading card
|
Atiim
Fooly Cooly.
Anime Empire.
10238
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 11:30:00 -
[10] - Quote
This is most likely a troll thread aiming to make a parody of decision to remove vehicles from 'Ambush', but since I've got some time on my hands, I'll humor you anyways.
1.) What good reason do you have for it's creation? (No, simply "hating" something is not a good reason).
2.) How many players do you think will actually participate in this game-mode?
3.) If your looking for practice, then why not simply sync against another tanker?
It should also be noted, that this would most likely require a UI change, which means it most likely won't happen. As for "LAV vs :LAV: idea, you can already find plenty of LAVs to fight. Though I think this would be a good avenue for LAV races.
Long Live The Anime Empire
"You know what? You really, REALLY, like to dampen the mood" - Lea Silencio
-HAND
|
|
|
anaboop
Dem Durrty Boyz
General Tso's Alliance
116
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 11:52:00 -
[11] - Quote
Atiim wrote:This is most likely a troll thread aiming to make a parody of decision to remove vehicles from 'Ambush', but since I've got some time on my hands, I'll humor you anyways.
1.) What good reason do you have for it's creation? (No, simply "hating" something is not a good reason).
2.) How many players do you think will actually participate in this game-mode?
3.) If your looking for practice, then why not simply sync against another tanker?
It should also be noted, that this would most likely require a UI change, which means it most likely won't happen. As for "LAV vs :LAV: idea, you can already find plenty of LAVs to fight. Though I think this would be a good avenue for LAV races.
No Im serious, i have no quarries about the ambush.
The point is for purely vehicle vs vehicle, with no AV like forge swarms AV nades plasma remotes proxies etc to interfere. Which would be impossible to sync as theres usually always someone with an AV fit that would interrupt said sync.
Anyone that wants the vehicle vs vehicle experience without the headache of infrantry ducking behind a rock leaving the drive away option. Builds situation awareness against other vehicles on maps currently out which u csn then take over to other gamemodes to add the challenege of infrantry, instead of taking it all on at once.
Only reason I suggested lav vs lav hav vs hav ds vs ds, is incase people wanted specifics. But not entirely necessary.
Just the elimination of the dropsuit advantages to gain practice.
Fully sick Anaboop trading card
|
Lorhak Gannarsein
Legio DXIV
4079
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 15:39:00 -
[12] - Quote
Atiim wrote:This is most likely a troll thread aiming to make a parody of decision to remove vehicles from 'Ambush', but since I've got some time on my hands, I'll humor you anyways.
1.) What good reason do you have for it's creation? (No, simply "hating" something is not a good reason).
2.) How many players do you think will actually participate in this game-mode?
3.) If your looking for practice, then why not simply sync against another tanker?
It should also be noted, that this would most likely require a UI change, which means it most likely won't happen. As for "LAV vs :LAV: idea, you can already find plenty of LAVs to fight. Though I think this would be a good avenue for LAV races.
Well I'd play it a lot.
AVing is why I like tanks - tank v tank is the fun bit. I actually miss the tank spam for that reason; after all, it basically guaranteed a tank in every match, even if it was just a soma.
CCP Rattati ily!
AmLogi 5 GÇó AmAss 5 GÇó AmSent 4 GÇó CalScout 5
CalLogi, you're next!
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |