DUST Search - Official CPM Thread

All Channels

Arcurio Square Speakers Corner

Official CPM Thread

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
KenKaniff69 Subdreddit 2435	Posted - 2014.07.05 13:48:00 - [1] - Quote Wait, weren't you against Zatara? Markdown:
KenKaniff69 Subdreddit 2435	Posted - 2014.07.05 18:21:00 - [2] - Quote I think being disliked by this ******* is akin to a badge of honor. Shame we once shared tags. Markdown:
KenKaniff69 Subdreddit 2444	Posted - 2014.07.08 00:38:00 - [3] - Quote Voted Markdown:
KenKaniff69 Subdreddit 2447	Posted - 2014.07.08 10:58:00 - [4] - Quote I'll be reporting all his posts. It's obvious to anyone that can read sota has a bone to pick. Seriously Sota? You didn't stop in Anarchide's or anyone else's thread, you are just trolling this one. While we appreciate the help in proving Zat's patience. Others can bump his thread without the agenda. Markdown:
KenKaniff69 Subdreddit 2447	Posted - 2014.07.08 11:16:00 - [5] - Quote I'll give it a whirl. Markdown:
KenKaniff69 Subdreddit 2449	Posted - 2014.07.08 11:42:00 - [6] - Quote Quote: Where's the content? Where's his side of the NPE? PC changes? Game mechanic changes? Why do we need to ask him these questions when they are fundamental to the success and progression to this game and should be obviously mentioned? Please show me where any CPM candidates said specifically how they are going to 'fix' NPE or PC for Dust in their respective campaign posts? To my knowledge none do, because until we get clear answers about what is possible, you'd be overpromising what you can't guarantee. Quote: Simply put - Zatara's campaign is completely dependent on his popularity. Lol, more like Infamy has been a huge distraction from his campaign. Quote: His actual ability as CPM will be 100% reliant on what others tell him and how he communicates. A baseless assertion you haven't proven. Easy to say nasty things about a person, much tougher to make them stick without showing where he's done this. And he refuted it here Quote: I think the assertion i'm 100% dependent on others is false, and can be proven by examples such as GImble's podcast where I disagreed with everyone there -before- 1.8 that the assault suits bonuses would suck, the work I contributed with Rattati's threads on gal scouts that was fully implemented, and more. Off the top of his head he stated ways he's been calling out issues, not just bandwagoning. I'm sure he could list more, but those examples suffice in proving you wrong. Quote: None of them are in any real positions of power where it'll influence there decision making. You, on the other hand, are. Actually, wrong, they all are. And many of them are involved in PC. Gonna skip the stuff Soraya refuted himself. Zatara answered the idea you can't hold power in game here by evidence from the past: Markdown:
KenKaniff69 Subdreddit 2449	Posted - 2014.07.08 11:45:00 - [7] - Quote Quote: Many many many of the best CSM members have been power players in their respective corps/alliances and contributed just fine. I do not think being in a position of power in game should be a deterrent to serving on the CSM or CPM. The number of CSM that have held power positions in game is numerous, but they handled the responsibility admirably. This is a much larger pool of evidence than the assertions based off Kane. Quote: Your experience is them all combined x 10. No one doubts you know how to use mechanics, but does that mean you understand them enough to help CCP? Your OP pretty much says no Omission is a fail way of deciding he's incapable of doing it. Which is a large problem with this whole line of trolling. Even if he did make a mistake and should have added info about some specifics, which he has elsewhere, it should have been a call for change, not dismissal. Just more evidence of why you're here. To be a jerk troll. Quote: I could vote in almost anyone else and would expect them to do what your OP is claiming makes you special. Which is exactly as it should be. Anyone who is willing to be an effective communicator to CCP for us all is qualified to be on the CPM. This is all that matters. The CPM don't handle game balance. It's just a bonus knowing what motivates him and his experience. Quote: Some of the people you mentioned will be great contributors among others also made individual endorsements and are listed such as Cross and Keval: Keval Longstride Pokey Dravon Aeon Amadi Cross Atu Soraya Xel He posts a list of people who specifically endorsed him at the cost of not endorsing another candidate and your response proves you didn't even read or get that at all: Quote: It's called politics, if they treat you like dirt they might get treated the same. They have to maintain a professional image, plus they aren't sure who they'll be working with on CPM so it's better to keep everyone on friendly levels. I wouldn't read into it. They didn't need to be nice to him when there are plenty of other viable candidates they could have endorsed. And it certainly doesn't keep it at friendly levels by omitting others. So I would read into it. You won't because it refutes your biased perception. Go ask them how about? Nah you'll find a reason not to of course. Markdown:
KenKaniff69 Subdreddit 2449	Posted - 2014.07.08 11:46:00 - [8] - Quote Quote: A parrot is better then nothing. Already refuted, you just ignored the rebuttal without addressing it. So exactly who is doing this? Quote: "How many other remarks did I make that are all true that you ignored?" Seems like it is YOU Sota. No wonder at that point he was wise to begin ignoring you "Lol, OK Sota." Everything since is just you saying insulting things. Markdown:
KenKaniff69 Subdreddit 2449	Posted - 2014.07.08 12:03:00 - [9] - Quote SoTasLost Property wrote: You should run for CPM Ken, not Zatara. lol Also, when did I say any candidate was going to fix anything? And when is being average good? If zatara isn't special then there's a list of candidates who are basically on equal footing with him. So what it boils down too - who cares the most to get things done for the community? You're posting for Zatara who couldn't reply himself, so that shows that. and if you check with EvE they too have a problem with CEO and CSM being the same, it's a topic there as well, and I'm sure there were several candidates who won enough trust to get through that, but does that make it right? Enough, I really do grow tired of this, I will make this my last post and will just look forward to the reply: Why is picking Zatara a better option then anyone else???? I just reposted what you ignored. They are on equal footing in a sense. But Not many can prove they have been here for the community. Endeavors such as Zat's Feedback threads recently on Gal Scouts/E-war, his thread that was widely supported to increase min scout base hack speed so that a gal scout can't best it, and his crowdscourcing thread on assaults to try and find the best idea to present to Rattati, on top of the added experience that is uniquely his (He has WAY more experience playing the game than anyone else aside from Aeon and Appia to my knowledge) all make him a fitting candidate and demonstrate that unlike some candidates that have some ideas of what they want to do, Zat's been here for the community trying to improve it. He proved this to me long ago from the moment he took me in from Subdreddit and inspired and taught me how to be competitive in PC. It's not a problem there in the CSM, you're completely mistaken. Some people gripe, but the players who are in positions and still serve (which is many even of the CSM today) have no issues. I'd like to hear of just 3 candidates that failed to get 'trust' enough due to their position in their respective corp/alliance as your post insinuates. Good luck. Markdown:
KenKaniff69 Subdreddit 2450	Posted - 2014.07.08 12:23:00 - [10] - Quote Perhaps next year. lmao ;) Zat's got my vote this year though, and I hope you consider helping him get elected by contributing your vote. He needs your help and vote, whether he likes it or not. Markdown:

KenKaniff69 Subdreddit 2453	Posted - 2014.07.08 19:57:00 - [11] - Quote The Noob Destroyer wrote: Sota was right. What were we thinking???? RIPPER FOR CPM! Save us Ripper! Save us from this wretched existance! Silence you! Markdown:
KenKaniff69 Subdreddit 2453	Posted - 2014.07.08 19:58:00 - [12] - Quote Bubaloo1 wrote: No Ok look another PC player who can't list reasons why he should be voting for Zat in order to even justify why he disagrees with him. NEXT! Markdown:

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.